Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment

Mark W Cornwall, Thomas G. McPoil, William D. Fishco, Lea Hunt, Camilla Lane, Deborah O'Donnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of visual rating of forefoot frontal plane deformities among clinicians with different training. Methods: Thirty individuals (16 men and 14 women) between the ages of 22 and 52 years of age participated in the study. None of the patients had a history of congenital deformity, pain, or trauma in the lower extremities during the 6 months before the study. Three clinicians of different educational backgrounds and experience visually evaluated each of the patients and rated forefoot alignment. None of the clinicians knew the rating assigned by either of the other two clinicians. Results: The results of this study showed that two of the clinical raters agreed 61.7% of the time, but neither of them agreed with the third clinician more than 15% of the time. Conclusion: This study indicates that the commonplace method of visually rating forefoot frontal plane deformities is unreliable and of questionable clinical value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-748
Number of pages4
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume25
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2004

Fingerprint

Lower Extremity
Pain
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Alignment
  • Forefoot
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Cornwall, M. W., McPoil, T. G., Fishco, W. D., Hunt, L., Lane, C., & O'Donnell, D. (2004). Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment. Foot and Ankle International, 25(10), 745-748.

Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment. / Cornwall, Mark W; McPoil, Thomas G.; Fishco, William D.; Hunt, Lea; Lane, Camilla; O'Donnell, Deborah.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 25, No. 10, 10.2004, p. 745-748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cornwall, MW, McPoil, TG, Fishco, WD, Hunt, L, Lane, C & O'Donnell, D 2004, 'Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment', Foot and Ankle International, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 745-748.
Cornwall MW, McPoil TG, Fishco WD, Hunt L, Lane C, O'Donnell D. Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment. Foot and Ankle International. 2004 Oct;25(10):745-748.
Cornwall, Mark W ; McPoil, Thomas G. ; Fishco, William D. ; Hunt, Lea ; Lane, Camilla ; O'Donnell, Deborah. / Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2004 ; Vol. 25, No. 10. pp. 745-748.
@article{42fe9f83d26744d58e4b29f0255fa90d,
title = "Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of visual rating of forefoot frontal plane deformities among clinicians with different training. Methods: Thirty individuals (16 men and 14 women) between the ages of 22 and 52 years of age participated in the study. None of the patients had a history of congenital deformity, pain, or trauma in the lower extremities during the 6 months before the study. Three clinicians of different educational backgrounds and experience visually evaluated each of the patients and rated forefoot alignment. None of the clinicians knew the rating assigned by either of the other two clinicians. Results: The results of this study showed that two of the clinical raters agreed 61.7{\%} of the time, but neither of them agreed with the third clinician more than 15{\%} of the time. Conclusion: This study indicates that the commonplace method of visually rating forefoot frontal plane deformities is unreliable and of questionable clinical value.",
keywords = "Alignment, Forefoot, Measurement",
author = "Cornwall, {Mark W} and McPoil, {Thomas G.} and Fishco, {William D.} and Lea Hunt and Camilla Lane and Deborah O'Donnell",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "745--748",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of visual measurement of forefoot alignment

AU - Cornwall, Mark W

AU - McPoil, Thomas G.

AU - Fishco, William D.

AU - Hunt, Lea

AU - Lane, Camilla

AU - O'Donnell, Deborah

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of visual rating of forefoot frontal plane deformities among clinicians with different training. Methods: Thirty individuals (16 men and 14 women) between the ages of 22 and 52 years of age participated in the study. None of the patients had a history of congenital deformity, pain, or trauma in the lower extremities during the 6 months before the study. Three clinicians of different educational backgrounds and experience visually evaluated each of the patients and rated forefoot alignment. None of the clinicians knew the rating assigned by either of the other two clinicians. Results: The results of this study showed that two of the clinical raters agreed 61.7% of the time, but neither of them agreed with the third clinician more than 15% of the time. Conclusion: This study indicates that the commonplace method of visually rating forefoot frontal plane deformities is unreliable and of questionable clinical value.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of visual rating of forefoot frontal plane deformities among clinicians with different training. Methods: Thirty individuals (16 men and 14 women) between the ages of 22 and 52 years of age participated in the study. None of the patients had a history of congenital deformity, pain, or trauma in the lower extremities during the 6 months before the study. Three clinicians of different educational backgrounds and experience visually evaluated each of the patients and rated forefoot alignment. None of the clinicians knew the rating assigned by either of the other two clinicians. Results: The results of this study showed that two of the clinical raters agreed 61.7% of the time, but neither of them agreed with the third clinician more than 15% of the time. Conclusion: This study indicates that the commonplace method of visually rating forefoot frontal plane deformities is unreliable and of questionable clinical value.

KW - Alignment

KW - Forefoot

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7244223330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7244223330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15566707

AN - SCOPUS:7244223330

VL - 25

SP - 745

EP - 748

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 10

ER -