Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude

A composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot

Thomas G. McPoil, Bill Vicenzino, Mark W Cornwall, Natalie Collins, Meghan Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to determine the reliability and minimal detectable change for a new composite measure of the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot called the foot mobility magnitude.Methods: Three hundred and forty-five healthy participants volunteered to take part in the study. The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing as well as the change in midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing were measured at 50% of total foot length and used to calculate the foot mobility magnitude. The reliability and minimal detectable change for the measurements were then determined based on the assessment of the measurements by three raters with different levels of clinical experience.Results: The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, and the foot mobility magnitude were shown to have high levels of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Normative data are provided for the left and right feet of both the female (n = 211) and male (n = 134) subjects.Conclusion: While the measurements of navicular drop and drift have been used as a clinical method to assess both the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot, poor to fair levels of inter-rater reliability have been reported. The results of the current study suggest that the foot mobility magnitude provides the clinician and researcher with a highly reliable measure of vertical and medial-lateral midfoot mobility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6
JournalJournal of Foot and Ankle Research
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 6 2009

Fingerprint

Foot
Weight-Bearing
Healthy Volunteers
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude : A composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot. / McPoil, Thomas G.; Vicenzino, Bill; Cornwall, Mark W; Collins, Natalie; Warren, Meghan.

In: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 6, 06.03.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd5ddb8415af46579fe91405e83db164,
title = "Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: A composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot",
abstract = "Background: A study was conducted to determine the reliability and minimal detectable change for a new composite measure of the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot called the foot mobility magnitude.Methods: Three hundred and forty-five healthy participants volunteered to take part in the study. The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing as well as the change in midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing were measured at 50{\%} of total foot length and used to calculate the foot mobility magnitude. The reliability and minimal detectable change for the measurements were then determined based on the assessment of the measurements by three raters with different levels of clinical experience.Results: The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, and the foot mobility magnitude were shown to have high levels of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Normative data are provided for the left and right feet of both the female (n = 211) and male (n = 134) subjects.Conclusion: While the measurements of navicular drop and drift have been used as a clinical method to assess both the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot, poor to fair levels of inter-rater reliability have been reported. The results of the current study suggest that the foot mobility magnitude provides the clinician and researcher with a highly reliable measure of vertical and medial-lateral midfoot mobility.",
author = "McPoil, {Thomas G.} and Bill Vicenzino and Cornwall, {Mark W} and Natalie Collins and Meghan Warren",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1186/1757-1146-2-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal of Foot and Ankle Research",
issn = "1757-1146",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude

T2 - A composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot

AU - McPoil, Thomas G.

AU - Vicenzino, Bill

AU - Cornwall, Mark W

AU - Collins, Natalie

AU - Warren, Meghan

PY - 2009/3/6

Y1 - 2009/3/6

N2 - Background: A study was conducted to determine the reliability and minimal detectable change for a new composite measure of the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot called the foot mobility magnitude.Methods: Three hundred and forty-five healthy participants volunteered to take part in the study. The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing as well as the change in midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing were measured at 50% of total foot length and used to calculate the foot mobility magnitude. The reliability and minimal detectable change for the measurements were then determined based on the assessment of the measurements by three raters with different levels of clinical experience.Results: The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, and the foot mobility magnitude were shown to have high levels of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Normative data are provided for the left and right feet of both the female (n = 211) and male (n = 134) subjects.Conclusion: While the measurements of navicular drop and drift have been used as a clinical method to assess both the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot, poor to fair levels of inter-rater reliability have been reported. The results of the current study suggest that the foot mobility magnitude provides the clinician and researcher with a highly reliable measure of vertical and medial-lateral midfoot mobility.

AB - Background: A study was conducted to determine the reliability and minimal detectable change for a new composite measure of the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot called the foot mobility magnitude.Methods: Three hundred and forty-five healthy participants volunteered to take part in the study. The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing as well as the change in midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing were measured at 50% of total foot length and used to calculate the foot mobility magnitude. The reliability and minimal detectable change for the measurements were then determined based on the assessment of the measurements by three raters with different levels of clinical experience.Results: The change in dorsal arch height between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, midfoot width between weight bearing and non-weight bearing, and the foot mobility magnitude were shown to have high levels of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Normative data are provided for the left and right feet of both the female (n = 211) and male (n = 134) subjects.Conclusion: While the measurements of navicular drop and drift have been used as a clinical method to assess both the vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot, poor to fair levels of inter-rater reliability have been reported. The results of the current study suggest that the foot mobility magnitude provides the clinician and researcher with a highly reliable measure of vertical and medial-lateral midfoot mobility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74449085259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74449085259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1757-1146-2-6

DO - 10.1186/1757-1146-2-6

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

JF - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

SN - 1757-1146

IS - 1

M1 - 6

ER -