Relative suitability of Virginia pine and loblolly pine as host species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Jessica S. Veysey, Matthew P. Ayres, María J. Lombardero, Richard Hofstetter, Kier D. Klepzig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman is a major disturbance agent in American pine forests, but attack preferences for various host species, and their relative suitability for reproduction, are poorly known. We studied patterns of beetle attack and reproduction during an infestation of stands containing Virginia pine and loblolly pine. Nearly all Virginia pine were attacked and killed, whereas a third of the loblolly pine escaped attack. Among attacked trees, the density of landings and attacks on Virginia pine was 56-106% higher than on loblolly pine at one site, whereas it was similar between species at another site. Paradoxically, D. frontalis preferred the host that was least suitable for reproduction: mean ± SE = 0.89 ± 0.33 versus 4.65 ± 1.40 progeny/attack in Virginia pine versus loblolly pine. Poor reproduction in Virginia pine was attributable to increased adult mortality, decreased oviposition, and decreased larval survival. Phloem thickness and nitrogen content were similar between the two pine species. Loblolly pine was significantly more suitable for the growth of Ophiostoma minus, a fungal associate of D. frontalis. Resin flow was lower in Virginia pine than in loblolly pine, although oleoresin chemistry may partly explain poor reproduction in Virginia pine. A simulation model predicted that beetle infestations will tend to collapse within stands dominated by Virginia pine, and that increasing availability of loblolly pine will promote infestation growth. Because of beetle preferences, forests that contain even modest proportions of Virginia pine relative to loblolly pine may be less likely to sustain beetle infestations. Management of species composition may provide a means for mitigating the undesirable impacts of this herbivore in pine forests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-679
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Entomology
Volume32
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pinus virginiana
Dendroctonus frontalis
Scolytidae
Pinus taeda
Coleoptera
beetle
phloem
coniferous forests
oviposition
herbivore
resin
Ophiostoma
oleoresins
disturbance
mortality
host preferences
nitrogen
nitrogen content
resins
simulation models

Keywords

  • Forest management
  • Host selection
  • Oleoresin
  • Population dynamics
  • Secondary attraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Insect Science
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Relative suitability of Virginia pine and loblolly pine as host species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera : Scolytidae). / Veysey, Jessica S.; Ayres, Matthew P.; Lombardero, María J.; Hofstetter, Richard; Klepzig, Kier D.

In: Environmental Entomology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 06.2003, p. 668-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Veysey, Jessica S. ; Ayres, Matthew P. ; Lombardero, María J. ; Hofstetter, Richard ; Klepzig, Kier D. / Relative suitability of Virginia pine and loblolly pine as host species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera : Scolytidae). In: Environmental Entomology. 2003 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 668-679.
@article{bbc8c6d7da1e42769b164accbb90bd64,
title = "Relative suitability of Virginia pine and loblolly pine as host species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)",
abstract = "Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman is a major disturbance agent in American pine forests, but attack preferences for various host species, and their relative suitability for reproduction, are poorly known. We studied patterns of beetle attack and reproduction during an infestation of stands containing Virginia pine and loblolly pine. Nearly all Virginia pine were attacked and killed, whereas a third of the loblolly pine escaped attack. Among attacked trees, the density of landings and attacks on Virginia pine was 56-106{\%} higher than on loblolly pine at one site, whereas it was similar between species at another site. Paradoxically, D. frontalis preferred the host that was least suitable for reproduction: mean ± SE = 0.89 ± 0.33 versus 4.65 ± 1.40 progeny/attack in Virginia pine versus loblolly pine. Poor reproduction in Virginia pine was attributable to increased adult mortality, decreased oviposition, and decreased larval survival. Phloem thickness and nitrogen content were similar between the two pine species. Loblolly pine was significantly more suitable for the growth of Ophiostoma minus, a fungal associate of D. frontalis. Resin flow was lower in Virginia pine than in loblolly pine, although oleoresin chemistry may partly explain poor reproduction in Virginia pine. A simulation model predicted that beetle infestations will tend to collapse within stands dominated by Virginia pine, and that increasing availability of loblolly pine will promote infestation growth. Because of beetle preferences, forests that contain even modest proportions of Virginia pine relative to loblolly pine may be less likely to sustain beetle infestations. Management of species composition may provide a means for mitigating the undesirable impacts of this herbivore in pine forests.",
keywords = "Forest management, Host selection, Oleoresin, Population dynamics, Secondary attraction",
author = "Veysey, {Jessica S.} and Ayres, {Matthew P.} and Lombardero, {Mar{\'i}a J.} and Richard Hofstetter and Klepzig, {Kier D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "668--679",
journal = "Environmental Entomology",
issn = "0046-225X",
publisher = "Entomological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative suitability of Virginia pine and loblolly pine as host species for Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera

T2 - Scolytidae)

AU - Veysey, Jessica S.

AU - Ayres, Matthew P.

AU - Lombardero, María J.

AU - Hofstetter, Richard

AU - Klepzig, Kier D.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman is a major disturbance agent in American pine forests, but attack preferences for various host species, and their relative suitability for reproduction, are poorly known. We studied patterns of beetle attack and reproduction during an infestation of stands containing Virginia pine and loblolly pine. Nearly all Virginia pine were attacked and killed, whereas a third of the loblolly pine escaped attack. Among attacked trees, the density of landings and attacks on Virginia pine was 56-106% higher than on loblolly pine at one site, whereas it was similar between species at another site. Paradoxically, D. frontalis preferred the host that was least suitable for reproduction: mean ± SE = 0.89 ± 0.33 versus 4.65 ± 1.40 progeny/attack in Virginia pine versus loblolly pine. Poor reproduction in Virginia pine was attributable to increased adult mortality, decreased oviposition, and decreased larval survival. Phloem thickness and nitrogen content were similar between the two pine species. Loblolly pine was significantly more suitable for the growth of Ophiostoma minus, a fungal associate of D. frontalis. Resin flow was lower in Virginia pine than in loblolly pine, although oleoresin chemistry may partly explain poor reproduction in Virginia pine. A simulation model predicted that beetle infestations will tend to collapse within stands dominated by Virginia pine, and that increasing availability of loblolly pine will promote infestation growth. Because of beetle preferences, forests that contain even modest proportions of Virginia pine relative to loblolly pine may be less likely to sustain beetle infestations. Management of species composition may provide a means for mitigating the undesirable impacts of this herbivore in pine forests.

AB - Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman is a major disturbance agent in American pine forests, but attack preferences for various host species, and their relative suitability for reproduction, are poorly known. We studied patterns of beetle attack and reproduction during an infestation of stands containing Virginia pine and loblolly pine. Nearly all Virginia pine were attacked and killed, whereas a third of the loblolly pine escaped attack. Among attacked trees, the density of landings and attacks on Virginia pine was 56-106% higher than on loblolly pine at one site, whereas it was similar between species at another site. Paradoxically, D. frontalis preferred the host that was least suitable for reproduction: mean ± SE = 0.89 ± 0.33 versus 4.65 ± 1.40 progeny/attack in Virginia pine versus loblolly pine. Poor reproduction in Virginia pine was attributable to increased adult mortality, decreased oviposition, and decreased larval survival. Phloem thickness and nitrogen content were similar between the two pine species. Loblolly pine was significantly more suitable for the growth of Ophiostoma minus, a fungal associate of D. frontalis. Resin flow was lower in Virginia pine than in loblolly pine, although oleoresin chemistry may partly explain poor reproduction in Virginia pine. A simulation model predicted that beetle infestations will tend to collapse within stands dominated by Virginia pine, and that increasing availability of loblolly pine will promote infestation growth. Because of beetle preferences, forests that contain even modest proportions of Virginia pine relative to loblolly pine may be less likely to sustain beetle infestations. Management of species composition may provide a means for mitigating the undesirable impacts of this herbivore in pine forests.

KW - Forest management

KW - Host selection

KW - Oleoresin

KW - Population dynamics

KW - Secondary attraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038234966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038234966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038234966

VL - 32

SP - 668

EP - 679

JO - Environmental Entomology

JF - Environmental Entomology

SN - 0046-225X

IS - 3

ER -