Refining the early history of the mojave-yavapai boundary zone

Rifting versus arc accretion as mechanisms for paleoproterozoic crustal growth in southwestern laurentia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three outstanding questions regarding Paleoproterozoic crustal growth and assembly in southwestern Laurentia are (1) the mechanisms of crustal growth (back-arc rifting and associated juvenile magmatism vs. accretion of juvenile arcs), (2) the nature and significance of pre-Yavapai orogeny (>1.70 Ga) deformation, and (3) how the isotopically mixed boundary zone between the Mojave and Yavapai Paleoproterozoic crustal provinces formed. Supracrustal successions associated with the Mojave-Yavapai boundary zone in northwestern Arizona are dominated by > 1730 Ma bimodal metavolcanic sequences and compositionally siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks, with minor ultramafic rocks, chert, and carbonate. This lithologic assemblage requires juvenile mafic volcanism in a basin that also received abundant quartz-rich (i.e., continental) detritus. A pre-D1 (first deformational event), back-arc rift setting for northwestern Arizona best explains the observed supracrustal assemblage. Plutonic rocks that intrude the supracrustal rocks are generally 5–15 m.yr. younger and span the entire compositional range of granitoids; i.e., they are not plutonic equivalents of the metavolcanic rocks. In the model presented here, supracrustal rocks were deposited in a back-arc basin above an east-dipping subduction zone undergoing slab rollback. Subsequent shallowing of the subducting slab resulted in (1) eastwardmigration of 1.76–1.74 Ga arcmagmatism in eastern California to 1.73–1.71 Ga arcmagmatism within the former back-arc basin in northwestern Arizona, (2) consequent closure of the back-arc basin, (3) thrusting of Yavapai province rocks over the basin (D1), resulting in (4) burial of supracrustal rocks to > 120 km, and ultimately, (5) gravitational collapse of the orogen. These events predated the 1.70–1.68 Ga Yavapai orogeny and occurred within a time interval of 5–20 m.yr. Similar time intervals for tectonic switching have been documented from the Lachlan orogen of eastern Australia. Rifting and associated magmatism and arc accretion are both viable—and not mutually exclusive—mechanisms for crustal growth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-38
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Geology
Volume123
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Laurentia
rifting
accretion
supracrustal rock
history
basin
orogeny
magmatism
slab
metavolcanic rock
plutonic rock
metasedimentary rock
chert
ultramafic rock
detritus
subduction zone
volcanism
refining
quartz
carbonate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Cite this

@article{cf97cdb1d68f4ccea56b8b51d9267b8a,
title = "Refining the early history of the mojave-yavapai boundary zone: Rifting versus arc accretion as mechanisms for paleoproterozoic crustal growth in southwestern laurentia",
abstract = "Three outstanding questions regarding Paleoproterozoic crustal growth and assembly in southwestern Laurentia are (1) the mechanisms of crustal growth (back-arc rifting and associated juvenile magmatism vs. accretion of juvenile arcs), (2) the nature and significance of pre-Yavapai orogeny (>1.70 Ga) deformation, and (3) how the isotopically mixed boundary zone between the Mojave and Yavapai Paleoproterozoic crustal provinces formed. Supracrustal successions associated with the Mojave-Yavapai boundary zone in northwestern Arizona are dominated by > 1730 Ma bimodal metavolcanic sequences and compositionally siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks, with minor ultramafic rocks, chert, and carbonate. This lithologic assemblage requires juvenile mafic volcanism in a basin that also received abundant quartz-rich (i.e., continental) detritus. A pre-D1 (first deformational event), back-arc rift setting for northwestern Arizona best explains the observed supracrustal assemblage. Plutonic rocks that intrude the supracrustal rocks are generally 5–15 m.yr. younger and span the entire compositional range of granitoids; i.e., they are not plutonic equivalents of the metavolcanic rocks. In the model presented here, supracrustal rocks were deposited in a back-arc basin above an east-dipping subduction zone undergoing slab rollback. Subsequent shallowing of the subducting slab resulted in (1) eastwardmigration of 1.76–1.74 Ga arcmagmatism in eastern California to 1.73–1.71 Ga arcmagmatism within the former back-arc basin in northwestern Arizona, (2) consequent closure of the back-arc basin, (3) thrusting of Yavapai province rocks over the basin (D1), resulting in (4) burial of supracrustal rocks to > 120 km, and ultimately, (5) gravitational collapse of the orogen. These events predated the 1.70–1.68 Ga Yavapai orogeny and occurred within a time interval of 5–20 m.yr. Similar time intervals for tectonic switching have been documented from the Lachlan orogen of eastern Australia. Rifting and associated magmatism and arc accretion are both viable—and not mutually exclusive—mechanisms for crustal growth.",
author = "Duebendorfer, {Ernest M.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1086/678950",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "21--38",
journal = "Journal of Geology",
issn = "0022-1376",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refining the early history of the mojave-yavapai boundary zone

T2 - Rifting versus arc accretion as mechanisms for paleoproterozoic crustal growth in southwestern laurentia

AU - Duebendorfer, Ernest M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Three outstanding questions regarding Paleoproterozoic crustal growth and assembly in southwestern Laurentia are (1) the mechanisms of crustal growth (back-arc rifting and associated juvenile magmatism vs. accretion of juvenile arcs), (2) the nature and significance of pre-Yavapai orogeny (>1.70 Ga) deformation, and (3) how the isotopically mixed boundary zone between the Mojave and Yavapai Paleoproterozoic crustal provinces formed. Supracrustal successions associated with the Mojave-Yavapai boundary zone in northwestern Arizona are dominated by > 1730 Ma bimodal metavolcanic sequences and compositionally siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks, with minor ultramafic rocks, chert, and carbonate. This lithologic assemblage requires juvenile mafic volcanism in a basin that also received abundant quartz-rich (i.e., continental) detritus. A pre-D1 (first deformational event), back-arc rift setting for northwestern Arizona best explains the observed supracrustal assemblage. Plutonic rocks that intrude the supracrustal rocks are generally 5–15 m.yr. younger and span the entire compositional range of granitoids; i.e., they are not plutonic equivalents of the metavolcanic rocks. In the model presented here, supracrustal rocks were deposited in a back-arc basin above an east-dipping subduction zone undergoing slab rollback. Subsequent shallowing of the subducting slab resulted in (1) eastwardmigration of 1.76–1.74 Ga arcmagmatism in eastern California to 1.73–1.71 Ga arcmagmatism within the former back-arc basin in northwestern Arizona, (2) consequent closure of the back-arc basin, (3) thrusting of Yavapai province rocks over the basin (D1), resulting in (4) burial of supracrustal rocks to > 120 km, and ultimately, (5) gravitational collapse of the orogen. These events predated the 1.70–1.68 Ga Yavapai orogeny and occurred within a time interval of 5–20 m.yr. Similar time intervals for tectonic switching have been documented from the Lachlan orogen of eastern Australia. Rifting and associated magmatism and arc accretion are both viable—and not mutually exclusive—mechanisms for crustal growth.

AB - Three outstanding questions regarding Paleoproterozoic crustal growth and assembly in southwestern Laurentia are (1) the mechanisms of crustal growth (back-arc rifting and associated juvenile magmatism vs. accretion of juvenile arcs), (2) the nature and significance of pre-Yavapai orogeny (>1.70 Ga) deformation, and (3) how the isotopically mixed boundary zone between the Mojave and Yavapai Paleoproterozoic crustal provinces formed. Supracrustal successions associated with the Mojave-Yavapai boundary zone in northwestern Arizona are dominated by > 1730 Ma bimodal metavolcanic sequences and compositionally siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks, with minor ultramafic rocks, chert, and carbonate. This lithologic assemblage requires juvenile mafic volcanism in a basin that also received abundant quartz-rich (i.e., continental) detritus. A pre-D1 (first deformational event), back-arc rift setting for northwestern Arizona best explains the observed supracrustal assemblage. Plutonic rocks that intrude the supracrustal rocks are generally 5–15 m.yr. younger and span the entire compositional range of granitoids; i.e., they are not plutonic equivalents of the metavolcanic rocks. In the model presented here, supracrustal rocks were deposited in a back-arc basin above an east-dipping subduction zone undergoing slab rollback. Subsequent shallowing of the subducting slab resulted in (1) eastwardmigration of 1.76–1.74 Ga arcmagmatism in eastern California to 1.73–1.71 Ga arcmagmatism within the former back-arc basin in northwestern Arizona, (2) consequent closure of the back-arc basin, (3) thrusting of Yavapai province rocks over the basin (D1), resulting in (4) burial of supracrustal rocks to > 120 km, and ultimately, (5) gravitational collapse of the orogen. These events predated the 1.70–1.68 Ga Yavapai orogeny and occurred within a time interval of 5–20 m.yr. Similar time intervals for tectonic switching have been documented from the Lachlan orogen of eastern Australia. Rifting and associated magmatism and arc accretion are both viable—and not mutually exclusive—mechanisms for crustal growth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922345330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922345330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/678950

DO - 10.1086/678950

M3 - Article

VL - 123

SP - 21

EP - 38

JO - Journal of Geology

JF - Journal of Geology

SN - 0022-1376

IS - 1

ER -