Reading to learn and reading to integrate

New tasks for reading comprehension tests?

Latricia Trites, Mary E McGroarty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To address the concern that most traditional reading comprehension tests only measure basic comprehension, this study designed measures to assess more complex reading tasks: Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate. The new measures were taken by 251 participants: 105 undergraduate native speakers of English, 106 undergraduate nonnative speakers, and 40 graduate nonnative speakers. The research subproblems included determination of the influence of overall basic reading comprehension level, native language background, medium of presentation, level of education, and computer familiarity on Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate measures; and the relationships among measures of Basic Comprehension, Reading to Learn, and Reading to Integrate. Results revealed that native language background and level of education had a significant effect on performance on both experimental measures, while other independent variables did not. While all reading measures showed some correlation, Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate had lower correlations with Basic Comprehension, suggesting a possible distinction between Basic Comprehension and the new measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-210
Number of pages37
JournalLanguage Testing
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

comprehension
level of education
Reading Comprehension
language
graduate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Reading to learn and reading to integrate : New tasks for reading comprehension tests? / Trites, Latricia; McGroarty, Mary E.

In: Language Testing, Vol. 22, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 174-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a5c80ea38784590884386e981f1da5b,
title = "Reading to learn and reading to integrate: New tasks for reading comprehension tests?",
abstract = "To address the concern that most traditional reading comprehension tests only measure basic comprehension, this study designed measures to assess more complex reading tasks: Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate. The new measures were taken by 251 participants: 105 undergraduate native speakers of English, 106 undergraduate nonnative speakers, and 40 graduate nonnative speakers. The research subproblems included determination of the influence of overall basic reading comprehension level, native language background, medium of presentation, level of education, and computer familiarity on Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate measures; and the relationships among measures of Basic Comprehension, Reading to Learn, and Reading to Integrate. Results revealed that native language background and level of education had a significant effect on performance on both experimental measures, while other independent variables did not. While all reading measures showed some correlation, Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate had lower correlations with Basic Comprehension, suggesting a possible distinction between Basic Comprehension and the new measures.",
author = "Latricia Trites and McGroarty, {Mary E}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1191/0265532205lt299oa",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "174--210",
journal = "Language Testing",
issn = "0265-5322",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reading to learn and reading to integrate

T2 - New tasks for reading comprehension tests?

AU - Trites, Latricia

AU - McGroarty, Mary E

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - To address the concern that most traditional reading comprehension tests only measure basic comprehension, this study designed measures to assess more complex reading tasks: Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate. The new measures were taken by 251 participants: 105 undergraduate native speakers of English, 106 undergraduate nonnative speakers, and 40 graduate nonnative speakers. The research subproblems included determination of the influence of overall basic reading comprehension level, native language background, medium of presentation, level of education, and computer familiarity on Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate measures; and the relationships among measures of Basic Comprehension, Reading to Learn, and Reading to Integrate. Results revealed that native language background and level of education had a significant effect on performance on both experimental measures, while other independent variables did not. While all reading measures showed some correlation, Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate had lower correlations with Basic Comprehension, suggesting a possible distinction between Basic Comprehension and the new measures.

AB - To address the concern that most traditional reading comprehension tests only measure basic comprehension, this study designed measures to assess more complex reading tasks: Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate. The new measures were taken by 251 participants: 105 undergraduate native speakers of English, 106 undergraduate nonnative speakers, and 40 graduate nonnative speakers. The research subproblems included determination of the influence of overall basic reading comprehension level, native language background, medium of presentation, level of education, and computer familiarity on Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate measures; and the relationships among measures of Basic Comprehension, Reading to Learn, and Reading to Integrate. Results revealed that native language background and level of education had a significant effect on performance on both experimental measures, while other independent variables did not. While all reading measures showed some correlation, Reading to Learn and Reading to Integrate had lower correlations with Basic Comprehension, suggesting a possible distinction between Basic Comprehension and the new measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17044390343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17044390343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/0265532205lt299oa

DO - 10.1191/0265532205lt299oa

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 174

EP - 210

JO - Language Testing

JF - Language Testing

SN - 0265-5322

IS - 2

ER -