Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research

Luke D Plonsky, Susan Gass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article constitutes the first empirical assessment of methodological quality in second language acquisition (SLA). We surveyed a corpus of 174 studies (N= 7,951) within the tradition of research on second-language interaction, one of the longest and most influential traditions of inquiry in SLA. Each report was coded for methodological features, statistical analyses, and reporting practices associated with research quality, and the resulting data were examined both cumulatively and over time. The findings indicate not only strengths and weaknesses but a possible relationship between study quality and outcomes; improvements over time and methodological trends are also noted. In addition to providing direction for future research and research practices, the study's findings are discussed and contextualized within the research culture of SLA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-366
Number of pages42
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

interaction research
quantitative research
language acquisition
quantitative method
research method
research practice
trend
interaction
language
Interaction
Research Methods
Second Language Acquisition
time

Keywords

  • Effect size
  • Interaction hypothesis
  • Quantitative research methods
  • Reporting practices
  • Study quality
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes : The Case of Interaction Research. / Plonsky, Luke D; Gass, Susan.

In: Language Learning, Vol. 61, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 325-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b6e7e59349d407fa159037f612edf39,
title = "Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research",
abstract = "This article constitutes the first empirical assessment of methodological quality in second language acquisition (SLA). We surveyed a corpus of 174 studies (N= 7,951) within the tradition of research on second-language interaction, one of the longest and most influential traditions of inquiry in SLA. Each report was coded for methodological features, statistical analyses, and reporting practices associated with research quality, and the resulting data were examined both cumulatively and over time. The findings indicate not only strengths and weaknesses but a possible relationship between study quality and outcomes; improvements over time and methodological trends are also noted. In addition to providing direction for future research and research practices, the study's findings are discussed and contextualized within the research culture of SLA.",
keywords = "Effect size, Interaction hypothesis, Quantitative research methods, Reporting practices, Study quality, Systematic review",
author = "Plonsky, {Luke D} and Susan Gass",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "325--366",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes

T2 - The Case of Interaction Research

AU - Plonsky, Luke D

AU - Gass, Susan

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - This article constitutes the first empirical assessment of methodological quality in second language acquisition (SLA). We surveyed a corpus of 174 studies (N= 7,951) within the tradition of research on second-language interaction, one of the longest and most influential traditions of inquiry in SLA. Each report was coded for methodological features, statistical analyses, and reporting practices associated with research quality, and the resulting data were examined both cumulatively and over time. The findings indicate not only strengths and weaknesses but a possible relationship between study quality and outcomes; improvements over time and methodological trends are also noted. In addition to providing direction for future research and research practices, the study's findings are discussed and contextualized within the research culture of SLA.

AB - This article constitutes the first empirical assessment of methodological quality in second language acquisition (SLA). We surveyed a corpus of 174 studies (N= 7,951) within the tradition of research on second-language interaction, one of the longest and most influential traditions of inquiry in SLA. Each report was coded for methodological features, statistical analyses, and reporting practices associated with research quality, and the resulting data were examined both cumulatively and over time. The findings indicate not only strengths and weaknesses but a possible relationship between study quality and outcomes; improvements over time and methodological trends are also noted. In addition to providing direction for future research and research practices, the study's findings are discussed and contextualized within the research culture of SLA.

KW - Effect size

KW - Interaction hypothesis

KW - Quantitative research methods

KW - Reporting practices

KW - Study quality

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955854176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955854176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955854176

VL - 61

SP - 325

EP - 366

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 2

ER -