Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are a number of methodological practices commonly employed by CALL researchers that limit progress in the field. Some of these practices are particular to replication research, but most are more general and are found throughout applied linguistics. I describe in this paper two studies that are fabricated but that resemble much of what is found in the field. Each study corresponds to and contains a set of methodological issues. Following each study, I address the issues they illustrate, providing comments and suggestions for how the analyses could be modified to produce greater replicability and/or replicational value. I conclude with a summary of suggestions for quantitative reforms related to improving replication research and quantitative practices more generally in CALL and applied linguistics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-244
Number of pages13
JournalCALICO Journal
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Linguistics
linguistics
reform
Replication
Applied Linguistics
Values
Summary

Keywords

  • Computer-assisted language instruction
  • Quantitative research methods
  • Replication
  • SLA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics. / Plonsky, Luke D.

In: CALICO Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 232-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff5ae19e7ce84d60a539910fc5246d23,
title = "Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics",
abstract = "There are a number of methodological practices commonly employed by CALL researchers that limit progress in the field. Some of these practices are particular to replication research, but most are more general and are found throughout applied linguistics. I describe in this paper two studies that are fabricated but that resemble much of what is found in the field. Each study corresponds to and contains a set of methodological issues. Following each study, I address the issues they illustrate, providing comments and suggestions for how the analyses could be modified to produce greater replicability and/or replicational value. I conclude with a summary of suggestions for quantitative reforms related to improving replication research and quantitative practices more generally in CALL and applied linguistics.",
keywords = "Computer-assisted language instruction, Quantitative research methods, Replication, SLA",
author = "Plonsky, {Luke D}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1558/cj.v32i2.26857",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "232--244",
journal = "CALICO Journal",
issn = "2056-9017",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics

AU - Plonsky, Luke D

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - There are a number of methodological practices commonly employed by CALL researchers that limit progress in the field. Some of these practices are particular to replication research, but most are more general and are found throughout applied linguistics. I describe in this paper two studies that are fabricated but that resemble much of what is found in the field. Each study corresponds to and contains a set of methodological issues. Following each study, I address the issues they illustrate, providing comments and suggestions for how the analyses could be modified to produce greater replicability and/or replicational value. I conclude with a summary of suggestions for quantitative reforms related to improving replication research and quantitative practices more generally in CALL and applied linguistics.

AB - There are a number of methodological practices commonly employed by CALL researchers that limit progress in the field. Some of these practices are particular to replication research, but most are more general and are found throughout applied linguistics. I describe in this paper two studies that are fabricated but that resemble much of what is found in the field. Each study corresponds to and contains a set of methodological issues. Following each study, I address the issues they illustrate, providing comments and suggestions for how the analyses could be modified to produce greater replicability and/or replicational value. I conclude with a summary of suggestions for quantitative reforms related to improving replication research and quantitative practices more generally in CALL and applied linguistics.

KW - Computer-assisted language instruction

KW - Quantitative research methods

KW - Replication

KW - SLA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969259599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969259599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1558/cj.v32i2.26857

DO - 10.1558/cj.v32i2.26857

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 232

EP - 244

JO - CALICO Journal

JF - CALICO Journal

SN - 2056-9017

IS - 2

ER -