Public deliberation about salmon restoration impacts

Differences in the input of citizens in different community roles

Charles C. Harris, Dennis R. Becker, Erik Nielsen, William J. Mclaughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We conducted a deliberative participatory process for social impact assessment (SIA), where interactive, community-based forums (ICFs) gathered public input about community impacts of alternatives for salmon recovery in the Inland Northwest of the United States. After residents were provided information about alternatives and engaged in facilitated discussions, we elicited their understandings of community conditions and judgments of socio-economic impacts. The present analysis focuses on the proposition that citizens engaged in the ICF process who represented diverse roles, based on community domains such as business, health-care, and education, would significantly differ in their judgments about those socio-economic impacts. We collected data on 705 community residents in forums conducted in 27 communities across the Inland Northwest. Results affirm that differences in roles and associated lifestyles, ideologies, and political viewpoints were related to differences in judgments of community conditions and contentiousness of planning alternatives. Implications for the ICF process and its effectiveness for SIA, as well as for other kinds of participatory processes, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1450033
JournalJournal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2014

Fingerprint

social impact assessment
economic impact
deliberation
restoration
citizen
health education
ideology
lifestyle
health care
community
social effects
resident
socioeconomics
public
Ideologies
analysis
planning

Keywords

  • collaborative decisionmaking
  • Public involvement
  • social impact assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Public deliberation about salmon restoration impacts : Differences in the input of citizens in different community roles. / Harris, Charles C.; Becker, Dennis R.; Nielsen, Erik; Mclaughlin, William J.

In: Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1450033, 12.12.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9be27e0e81c40e991b65bc8e0f71a2f,
title = "Public deliberation about salmon restoration impacts: Differences in the input of citizens in different community roles",
abstract = "We conducted a deliberative participatory process for social impact assessment (SIA), where interactive, community-based forums (ICFs) gathered public input about community impacts of alternatives for salmon recovery in the Inland Northwest of the United States. After residents were provided information about alternatives and engaged in facilitated discussions, we elicited their understandings of community conditions and judgments of socio-economic impacts. The present analysis focuses on the proposition that citizens engaged in the ICF process who represented diverse roles, based on community domains such as business, health-care, and education, would significantly differ in their judgments about those socio-economic impacts. We collected data on 705 community residents in forums conducted in 27 communities across the Inland Northwest. Results affirm that differences in roles and associated lifestyles, ideologies, and political viewpoints were related to differences in judgments of community conditions and contentiousness of planning alternatives. Implications for the ICF process and its effectiveness for SIA, as well as for other kinds of participatory processes, are discussed.",
keywords = "collaborative decisionmaking, Public involvement, social impact assessment",
author = "Harris, {Charles C.} and Becker, {Dennis R.} and Erik Nielsen and Mclaughlin, {William J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1142/S1464333214500331",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management",
issn = "1464-3332",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public deliberation about salmon restoration impacts

T2 - Differences in the input of citizens in different community roles

AU - Harris, Charles C.

AU - Becker, Dennis R.

AU - Nielsen, Erik

AU - Mclaughlin, William J.

PY - 2014/12/12

Y1 - 2014/12/12

N2 - We conducted a deliberative participatory process for social impact assessment (SIA), where interactive, community-based forums (ICFs) gathered public input about community impacts of alternatives for salmon recovery in the Inland Northwest of the United States. After residents were provided information about alternatives and engaged in facilitated discussions, we elicited their understandings of community conditions and judgments of socio-economic impacts. The present analysis focuses on the proposition that citizens engaged in the ICF process who represented diverse roles, based on community domains such as business, health-care, and education, would significantly differ in their judgments about those socio-economic impacts. We collected data on 705 community residents in forums conducted in 27 communities across the Inland Northwest. Results affirm that differences in roles and associated lifestyles, ideologies, and political viewpoints were related to differences in judgments of community conditions and contentiousness of planning alternatives. Implications for the ICF process and its effectiveness for SIA, as well as for other kinds of participatory processes, are discussed.

AB - We conducted a deliberative participatory process for social impact assessment (SIA), where interactive, community-based forums (ICFs) gathered public input about community impacts of alternatives for salmon recovery in the Inland Northwest of the United States. After residents were provided information about alternatives and engaged in facilitated discussions, we elicited their understandings of community conditions and judgments of socio-economic impacts. The present analysis focuses on the proposition that citizens engaged in the ICF process who represented diverse roles, based on community domains such as business, health-care, and education, would significantly differ in their judgments about those socio-economic impacts. We collected data on 705 community residents in forums conducted in 27 communities across the Inland Northwest. Results affirm that differences in roles and associated lifestyles, ideologies, and political viewpoints were related to differences in judgments of community conditions and contentiousness of planning alternatives. Implications for the ICF process and its effectiveness for SIA, as well as for other kinds of participatory processes, are discussed.

KW - collaborative decisionmaking

KW - Public involvement

KW - social impact assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929224341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929224341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1142/S1464333214500331

DO - 10.1142/S1464333214500331

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management

SN - 1464-3332

IS - 4

M1 - 1450033

ER -