Protecting climate with forests

Robert B. Jackson, James T. Randerson, Josep G. Canadell, Ray G. Anderson, Roni Avissar, Dennis D. Baldocchi, Gordon B. Bonan, Ken Caldeira, Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Christopher B. Field, Bruce A Hungate, Esteban G. Jobbágy, Lara M. Kueppers, Marcelo D. Nosetto, Diane E. Pataki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

234 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policies for climate mitigation on land rarely acknowledge biophysical factors, such as reflectivity, evaporation, and surface roughness. Yet such factors can alter temperatures much more than carbon sequestration does, and often in a conflicting way. We outline a framework for examining biophysical factors in mitigation policies and provide some best-practice recommendations based on that framework. Tropical projects - avoided deforestation, forest restoration, and afforestation - provide the greatest climate value, because carbon storage and biophysics align to cool the Earth. In contrast, the climate benefits of carbon storage are often counteracted in boreal and other snow-covered regions, where darker trees trap more heat than snow does. Managers can increase the climate benefit of some forest projects by using more reflective and deciduous species and through urban forestry projects that reduce energy use. Ignoring biophysical interactions could result in millions of dollars being invested in some mitigation projects that provide little climate benefit or, worse, are counter-productive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number044006
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Climate
Snow
Carbon
carbon sequestration
climate
mitigation
Biophysics
Deforestation
Forestry
snow
Restoration
Carbon Sequestration
biophysics
urban forestry
Evaporation
Managers
Surface roughness
Earth (planet)
Conservation of Natural Resources
afforestation

Keywords

  • Afforestation
  • Albedo
  • Avoided deforestation
  • Biophysics
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Climate change
  • Climate policy
  • Forest restoration
  • Global warming
  • Temperate and boreal forests
  • tropical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Jackson, R. B., Randerson, J. T., Canadell, J. G., Anderson, R. G., Avissar, R., Baldocchi, D. D., ... Pataki, D. E. (2008). Protecting climate with forests. Environmental Research Letters, 3(4), [044006]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006

Protecting climate with forests. / Jackson, Robert B.; Randerson, James T.; Canadell, Josep G.; Anderson, Ray G.; Avissar, Roni; Baldocchi, Dennis D.; Bonan, Gordon B.; Caldeira, Ken; Diffenbaugh, Noah S.; Field, Christopher B.; Hungate, Bruce A; Jobbágy, Esteban G.; Kueppers, Lara M.; Nosetto, Marcelo D.; Pataki, Diane E.

In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 3, No. 4, 044006, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, RB, Randerson, JT, Canadell, JG, Anderson, RG, Avissar, R, Baldocchi, DD, Bonan, GB, Caldeira, K, Diffenbaugh, NS, Field, CB, Hungate, BA, Jobbágy, EG, Kueppers, LM, Nosetto, MD & Pataki, DE 2008, 'Protecting climate with forests', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 3, no. 4, 044006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006
Jackson RB, Randerson JT, Canadell JG, Anderson RG, Avissar R, Baldocchi DD et al. Protecting climate with forests. Environmental Research Letters. 2008;3(4). 044006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006
Jackson, Robert B. ; Randerson, James T. ; Canadell, Josep G. ; Anderson, Ray G. ; Avissar, Roni ; Baldocchi, Dennis D. ; Bonan, Gordon B. ; Caldeira, Ken ; Diffenbaugh, Noah S. ; Field, Christopher B. ; Hungate, Bruce A ; Jobbágy, Esteban G. ; Kueppers, Lara M. ; Nosetto, Marcelo D. ; Pataki, Diane E. / Protecting climate with forests. In: Environmental Research Letters. 2008 ; Vol. 3, No. 4.
@article{6acc13385376440aa0682427f280e04d,
title = "Protecting climate with forests",
abstract = "Policies for climate mitigation on land rarely acknowledge biophysical factors, such as reflectivity, evaporation, and surface roughness. Yet such factors can alter temperatures much more than carbon sequestration does, and often in a conflicting way. We outline a framework for examining biophysical factors in mitigation policies and provide some best-practice recommendations based on that framework. Tropical projects - avoided deforestation, forest restoration, and afforestation - provide the greatest climate value, because carbon storage and biophysics align to cool the Earth. In contrast, the climate benefits of carbon storage are often counteracted in boreal and other snow-covered regions, where darker trees trap more heat than snow does. Managers can increase the climate benefit of some forest projects by using more reflective and deciduous species and through urban forestry projects that reduce energy use. Ignoring biophysical interactions could result in millions of dollars being invested in some mitigation projects that provide little climate benefit or, worse, are counter-productive.",
keywords = "Afforestation, Albedo, Avoided deforestation, Biophysics, Carbon sequestration, Climate change, Climate policy, Forest restoration, Global warming, Temperate and boreal forests, tropical",
author = "Jackson, {Robert B.} and Randerson, {James T.} and Canadell, {Josep G.} and Anderson, {Ray G.} and Roni Avissar and Baldocchi, {Dennis D.} and Bonan, {Gordon B.} and Ken Caldeira and Diffenbaugh, {Noah S.} and Field, {Christopher B.} and Hungate, {Bruce A} and Jobb{\'a}gy, {Esteban G.} and Kueppers, {Lara M.} and Nosetto, {Marcelo D.} and Pataki, {Diane E.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting climate with forests

AU - Jackson, Robert B.

AU - Randerson, James T.

AU - Canadell, Josep G.

AU - Anderson, Ray G.

AU - Avissar, Roni

AU - Baldocchi, Dennis D.

AU - Bonan, Gordon B.

AU - Caldeira, Ken

AU - Diffenbaugh, Noah S.

AU - Field, Christopher B.

AU - Hungate, Bruce A

AU - Jobbágy, Esteban G.

AU - Kueppers, Lara M.

AU - Nosetto, Marcelo D.

AU - Pataki, Diane E.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Policies for climate mitigation on land rarely acknowledge biophysical factors, such as reflectivity, evaporation, and surface roughness. Yet such factors can alter temperatures much more than carbon sequestration does, and often in a conflicting way. We outline a framework for examining biophysical factors in mitigation policies and provide some best-practice recommendations based on that framework. Tropical projects - avoided deforestation, forest restoration, and afforestation - provide the greatest climate value, because carbon storage and biophysics align to cool the Earth. In contrast, the climate benefits of carbon storage are often counteracted in boreal and other snow-covered regions, where darker trees trap more heat than snow does. Managers can increase the climate benefit of some forest projects by using more reflective and deciduous species and through urban forestry projects that reduce energy use. Ignoring biophysical interactions could result in millions of dollars being invested in some mitigation projects that provide little climate benefit or, worse, are counter-productive.

AB - Policies for climate mitigation on land rarely acknowledge biophysical factors, such as reflectivity, evaporation, and surface roughness. Yet such factors can alter temperatures much more than carbon sequestration does, and often in a conflicting way. We outline a framework for examining biophysical factors in mitigation policies and provide some best-practice recommendations based on that framework. Tropical projects - avoided deforestation, forest restoration, and afforestation - provide the greatest climate value, because carbon storage and biophysics align to cool the Earth. In contrast, the climate benefits of carbon storage are often counteracted in boreal and other snow-covered regions, where darker trees trap more heat than snow does. Managers can increase the climate benefit of some forest projects by using more reflective and deciduous species and through urban forestry projects that reduce energy use. Ignoring biophysical interactions could result in millions of dollars being invested in some mitigation projects that provide little climate benefit or, worse, are counter-productive.

KW - Afforestation

KW - Albedo

KW - Avoided deforestation

KW - Biophysics

KW - Carbon sequestration

KW - Climate change

KW - Climate policy

KW - Forest restoration

KW - Global warming

KW - Temperate and boreal forests

KW - tropical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60649091702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60649091702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 4

M1 - 044006

ER -