Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment

A Critique of Tyler's Analysis

Sumner J Sydeman, Michele Cascardi, Norman G. Poythress, Lee M. Ritterband

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler's 1992 review of procedural justice and its effect on therapeutic outcome in patients involved in civil commitment hearings. The article clarifies critical elements of Tyler's analysis by drawing on the social cognition construct of information control and elements in the consumerism literature that may mirror and facilitate procedural justice effects. The importance of the committing psychiatrist's role during the commitment hearing is emphasized and issues unique to civil commitment respondents that might affect their susceptibility to procedural justice effects are highlighted. Further research examining the effects of judges', attorneys', and psychiatrists' behavior on the patient's perception of procedural justice and subsequent therapeutic outcome is suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-221
Number of pages15
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume3
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
justice
commitment
psychiatrist
Hearing
Psychiatry
Lawyers
social cognition
Therapeutic Uses
Cognition
Research
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment : A Critique of Tyler's Analysis. / Sydeman, Sumner J; Cascardi, Michele; Poythress, Norman G.; Ritterband, Lee M.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 03.1997, p. 207-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sydeman, Sumner J ; Cascardi, Michele ; Poythress, Norman G. ; Ritterband, Lee M. / Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment : A Critique of Tyler's Analysis. In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 1997 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 207-221.
@article{baa188af740649b29746d44310735c7e,
title = "Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: A Critique of Tyler's Analysis",
abstract = "This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler's 1992 review of procedural justice and its effect on therapeutic outcome in patients involved in civil commitment hearings. The article clarifies critical elements of Tyler's analysis by drawing on the social cognition construct of information control and elements in the consumerism literature that may mirror and facilitate procedural justice effects. The importance of the committing psychiatrist's role during the commitment hearing is emphasized and issues unique to civil commitment respondents that might affect their susceptibility to procedural justice effects are highlighted. Further research examining the effects of judges', attorneys', and psychiatrists' behavior on the patient's perception of procedural justice and subsequent therapeutic outcome is suggested.",
author = "Sydeman, {Sumner J} and Michele Cascardi and Poythress, {Norman G.} and Ritterband, {Lee M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "207--221",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment

T2 - A Critique of Tyler's Analysis

AU - Sydeman, Sumner J

AU - Cascardi, Michele

AU - Poythress, Norman G.

AU - Ritterband, Lee M.

PY - 1997/3

Y1 - 1997/3

N2 - This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler's 1992 review of procedural justice and its effect on therapeutic outcome in patients involved in civil commitment hearings. The article clarifies critical elements of Tyler's analysis by drawing on the social cognition construct of information control and elements in the consumerism literature that may mirror and facilitate procedural justice effects. The importance of the committing psychiatrist's role during the commitment hearing is emphasized and issues unique to civil commitment respondents that might affect their susceptibility to procedural justice effects are highlighted. Further research examining the effects of judges', attorneys', and psychiatrists' behavior on the patient's perception of procedural justice and subsequent therapeutic outcome is suggested.

AB - This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler's 1992 review of procedural justice and its effect on therapeutic outcome in patients involved in civil commitment hearings. The article clarifies critical elements of Tyler's analysis by drawing on the social cognition construct of information control and elements in the consumerism literature that may mirror and facilitate procedural justice effects. The importance of the committing psychiatrist's role during the commitment hearing is emphasized and issues unique to civil commitment respondents that might affect their susceptibility to procedural justice effects are highlighted. Further research examining the effects of judges', attorneys', and psychiatrists' behavior on the patient's perception of procedural justice and subsequent therapeutic outcome is suggested.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031331157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031331157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 207

EP - 221

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 1

ER -