Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region

Matthew A Bowker, Mark E. Miller, Jayne Belnap, Thomas D Sisk, Nancy Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conservation prioritization usually focuses on conservation of rare species or biodiversity, rather than ecological processes. This is partially due to a lack of informative indicators of ecosystem function. Biological soil crusts (BSCs) trap and retain soil and water resources in arid ecosystems and function as major carbon and nitrogen fixers; thus, they may be informative indicators of ecosystem function. We created spatial models of multiple indicators of the diversity and function of BSCs (species richness, evenness, functional diversity, functional redundancy, number of rare species, number of habitat specialists, nitrogen and carbon fixation indices, soil stabilization, and surface roughening) for the 800,000-ha Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Utah, U.S.A.). We then combined the indicators into a single BSC function map and a single BSC biodiversity map (2 alternative types of conservation value) with an unweighted averaging procedure and a weighted procedure derived from validations performance. We also modeled potential degradation with data from a rangeland assessment survey. To determine which areas on the landscape were the highest conservation priorities, we overlaid the function- and diversity-based conservation-value layers on the potential degradation layer. Different methods for ascribing conservation-value and conservation-priority layers all yielded strikingly similar results (r = 0.89-0.99), which suggests that in this case biodiversity and function can be conserved simultaneously. We believe BSCs can be used as indicators of ecosystem function in concert with other indicators (such as plant-community properties) and that such information can be used to prioritize conservation effort in drylands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1533-1543
Number of pages11
JournalConservation Biology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

soil crusts
soil crust
ecosystem function
arid region
arid zones
ecosystems
biodiversity
soil stabilization
rare species
degradation
prioritization
soil resources
functional diversity
rangelands
arid lands
nitrogen fixation
water resources
plant communities
traps
carbon fixation

Keywords

  • Conservation planning
  • Conservation prioritization
  • Cryptogams
  • Cyanobacteria
  • Deserts
  • Ecological indicators
  • Ecosystem engineers
  • Ecosystem function
  • Ecosystem services
  • Semiarid lands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region. / Bowker, Matthew A; Miller, Mark E.; Belnap, Jayne; Sisk, Thomas D; Johnson, Nancy.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 22, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 1533-1543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{113720d376ce430bade0c67fe8568d7c,
title = "Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region",
abstract = "Conservation prioritization usually focuses on conservation of rare species or biodiversity, rather than ecological processes. This is partially due to a lack of informative indicators of ecosystem function. Biological soil crusts (BSCs) trap and retain soil and water resources in arid ecosystems and function as major carbon and nitrogen fixers; thus, they may be informative indicators of ecosystem function. We created spatial models of multiple indicators of the diversity and function of BSCs (species richness, evenness, functional diversity, functional redundancy, number of rare species, number of habitat specialists, nitrogen and carbon fixation indices, soil stabilization, and surface roughening) for the 800,000-ha Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Utah, U.S.A.). We then combined the indicators into a single BSC function map and a single BSC biodiversity map (2 alternative types of conservation value) with an unweighted averaging procedure and a weighted procedure derived from validations performance. We also modeled potential degradation with data from a rangeland assessment survey. To determine which areas on the landscape were the highest conservation priorities, we overlaid the function- and diversity-based conservation-value layers on the potential degradation layer. Different methods for ascribing conservation-value and conservation-priority layers all yielded strikingly similar results (r = 0.89-0.99), which suggests that in this case biodiversity and function can be conserved simultaneously. We believe BSCs can be used as indicators of ecosystem function in concert with other indicators (such as plant-community properties) and that such information can be used to prioritize conservation effort in drylands.",
keywords = "Conservation planning, Conservation prioritization, Cryptogams, Cyanobacteria, Deserts, Ecological indicators, Ecosystem engineers, Ecosystem function, Ecosystem services, Semiarid lands",
author = "Bowker, {Matthew A} and Miller, {Mark E.} and Jayne Belnap and Sisk, {Thomas D} and Nancy Johnson",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01036.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1533--1543",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prioritizing conservation effort through the use of biological soil crusts as ecosystem function indicators in an arid region

AU - Bowker, Matthew A

AU - Miller, Mark E.

AU - Belnap, Jayne

AU - Sisk, Thomas D

AU - Johnson, Nancy

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Conservation prioritization usually focuses on conservation of rare species or biodiversity, rather than ecological processes. This is partially due to a lack of informative indicators of ecosystem function. Biological soil crusts (BSCs) trap and retain soil and water resources in arid ecosystems and function as major carbon and nitrogen fixers; thus, they may be informative indicators of ecosystem function. We created spatial models of multiple indicators of the diversity and function of BSCs (species richness, evenness, functional diversity, functional redundancy, number of rare species, number of habitat specialists, nitrogen and carbon fixation indices, soil stabilization, and surface roughening) for the 800,000-ha Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Utah, U.S.A.). We then combined the indicators into a single BSC function map and a single BSC biodiversity map (2 alternative types of conservation value) with an unweighted averaging procedure and a weighted procedure derived from validations performance. We also modeled potential degradation with data from a rangeland assessment survey. To determine which areas on the landscape were the highest conservation priorities, we overlaid the function- and diversity-based conservation-value layers on the potential degradation layer. Different methods for ascribing conservation-value and conservation-priority layers all yielded strikingly similar results (r = 0.89-0.99), which suggests that in this case biodiversity and function can be conserved simultaneously. We believe BSCs can be used as indicators of ecosystem function in concert with other indicators (such as plant-community properties) and that such information can be used to prioritize conservation effort in drylands.

AB - Conservation prioritization usually focuses on conservation of rare species or biodiversity, rather than ecological processes. This is partially due to a lack of informative indicators of ecosystem function. Biological soil crusts (BSCs) trap and retain soil and water resources in arid ecosystems and function as major carbon and nitrogen fixers; thus, they may be informative indicators of ecosystem function. We created spatial models of multiple indicators of the diversity and function of BSCs (species richness, evenness, functional diversity, functional redundancy, number of rare species, number of habitat specialists, nitrogen and carbon fixation indices, soil stabilization, and surface roughening) for the 800,000-ha Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (Utah, U.S.A.). We then combined the indicators into a single BSC function map and a single BSC biodiversity map (2 alternative types of conservation value) with an unweighted averaging procedure and a weighted procedure derived from validations performance. We also modeled potential degradation with data from a rangeland assessment survey. To determine which areas on the landscape were the highest conservation priorities, we overlaid the function- and diversity-based conservation-value layers on the potential degradation layer. Different methods for ascribing conservation-value and conservation-priority layers all yielded strikingly similar results (r = 0.89-0.99), which suggests that in this case biodiversity and function can be conserved simultaneously. We believe BSCs can be used as indicators of ecosystem function in concert with other indicators (such as plant-community properties) and that such information can be used to prioritize conservation effort in drylands.

KW - Conservation planning

KW - Conservation prioritization

KW - Cryptogams

KW - Cyanobacteria

KW - Deserts

KW - Ecological indicators

KW - Ecosystem engineers

KW - Ecosystem function

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Semiarid lands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57449099109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57449099109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01036.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01036.x

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1533

EP - 1543

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 6

ER -