Prey location, biomechanical constraints, and motor program choice during prey capture in the tomato frog, dyscophus guineti

Jenna A. Monroy, Kiisa C. Nishikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigated how visual information about prey location and biomechanical constraints of the feeding apparatus influence the feeding behavior of the tomato frog, Dyscophus guineti. When feeding on prey at small azimuths (less than ± 40°), frogs aimed their heads toward the prey but did not aim their tongues relative to their heads. Frogs projected their tongues rapidly by transferring momentum from the lower jaw to the tongue. Storage and recovery of elastic energy by the mouth opening muscles amplified the velocities of mouth opening and tongue projection. This behavior can only occur when the lower jaw and tongue are aligned (i.e., within the range of motion of the neck). When feeding on prey at large azimuths (greater than ± 40°), frogs aimed both the head and tongue toward the prey and used a muscular hydrostatic mechanism to project the tongue. Hydrostatic elongation allows for frogs to capture prey at greater azimuthal locations. Because the tongue moves independently of the lower jaw, frogs can no longer take advantage of momentum transfer to amplify the speed of tongue projection. To feed on prey at different azimuthal locations, tomato frogs switch between alternative strategies to circumvent these biomechanical constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)843-852
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
Volume195
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 6 2009

Keywords

  • Amphibian
  • Behavioral choice
  • Biomechanical tradeoffs
  • Feeding
  • Frog

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Physiology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prey location, biomechanical constraints, and motor program choice during prey capture in the tomato frog, dyscophus guineti'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this