Predicting abundance of desert riparian birds: Validation and calibration of the effective area model

L. Arriana Brand, Barry R. Noon, Thomas D. Sisk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reliable prediction of the effects of landscape change on species abundance is critical to land managers who must make frequent, rapid decisions with long-term consequences. However, due to inherent temporal and spatial variability in ecological systems, previous attempts to predict species abundance in novel locations and/or time frames have been largely unsuccessful. The Effective Area Model (EAM) uses change in habitat composition and geometry coupled with response of animals to habitat edges to predict change in species abundance at a landscape scale. Our research goals were to validate EAM abundance predictions in new locations and to develop a calibration framework that enables absolute abundance predictions in novel regions or time frames. For model validation, we compared the EAM to a null model excluding edge effects in terms of accurate prediction of species abundance. The EAM outperformed the null model for 83.3% of species (N = 12) for which it was possible to discern a difference when considering 50 validation sites. Likewise, the EAM outperformed the null model when considering subsets of validation sites categorized on the basis of four variables (isolation, presence of water, region, and focal habitat). Additionally, we explored a framework for producing calibrated models to decrease prediction error given inherent temporal and spatial variability in abundance. We calibrated the EAM to new locations using linear regression between observed and predicted abundance with and without additional habitat covariates. We found that model adjustments for unexplained variability in time and space, as well as variability that can be explained by incorporating additional covariates, improved EAM predictions. Calibrated EAM abundance estimates with additional site-level variables explained a significant amount of variability (P < 0.05) in observed abundance for 17 of 20 species, with R2 values >25% for 12 species, >48% for six species, and >60% for four species when considering all predictive models. The calibration framework described in this paper can be used to predict absolute abundance in sites different from those in which data were collected if the target population of sites to which one would like to statistically infer is sampled in a probabilistic way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1090-1102
Number of pages13
JournalEcological Applications
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

desert
bird
calibration
prediction
habitat
edge effect
model validation
landscape change
geometry
animal

Keywords

  • Abundance
  • Birds
  • Calibration
  • Effective Area Model (EAM)
  • Model testing
  • Null model
  • Prediction
  • San Pedro River, Arizona, USA
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Predicting abundance of desert riparian birds : Validation and calibration of the effective area model. / Brand, L. Arriana; Noon, Barry R.; Sisk, Thomas D.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2006, p. 1090-1102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b4640cb600f42a386e18e968d1c9ffb,
title = "Predicting abundance of desert riparian birds: Validation and calibration of the effective area model",
abstract = "Reliable prediction of the effects of landscape change on species abundance is critical to land managers who must make frequent, rapid decisions with long-term consequences. However, due to inherent temporal and spatial variability in ecological systems, previous attempts to predict species abundance in novel locations and/or time frames have been largely unsuccessful. The Effective Area Model (EAM) uses change in habitat composition and geometry coupled with response of animals to habitat edges to predict change in species abundance at a landscape scale. Our research goals were to validate EAM abundance predictions in new locations and to develop a calibration framework that enables absolute abundance predictions in novel regions or time frames. For model validation, we compared the EAM to a null model excluding edge effects in terms of accurate prediction of species abundance. The EAM outperformed the null model for 83.3{\%} of species (N = 12) for which it was possible to discern a difference when considering 50 validation sites. Likewise, the EAM outperformed the null model when considering subsets of validation sites categorized on the basis of four variables (isolation, presence of water, region, and focal habitat). Additionally, we explored a framework for producing calibrated models to decrease prediction error given inherent temporal and spatial variability in abundance. We calibrated the EAM to new locations using linear regression between observed and predicted abundance with and without additional habitat covariates. We found that model adjustments for unexplained variability in time and space, as well as variability that can be explained by incorporating additional covariates, improved EAM predictions. Calibrated EAM abundance estimates with additional site-level variables explained a significant amount of variability (P < 0.05) in observed abundance for 17 of 20 species, with R2 values >25{\%} for 12 species, >48{\%} for six species, and >60{\%} for four species when considering all predictive models. The calibration framework described in this paper can be used to predict absolute abundance in sites different from those in which data were collected if the target population of sites to which one would like to statistically infer is sampled in a probabilistic way.",
keywords = "Abundance, Birds, Calibration, Effective Area Model (EAM), Model testing, Null model, Prediction, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA, Validation",
author = "Brand, {L. Arriana} and Noon, {Barry R.} and Sisk, {Thomas D.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1090:PAODRB]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1090--1102",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting abundance of desert riparian birds

T2 - Validation and calibration of the effective area model

AU - Brand, L. Arriana

AU - Noon, Barry R.

AU - Sisk, Thomas D.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Reliable prediction of the effects of landscape change on species abundance is critical to land managers who must make frequent, rapid decisions with long-term consequences. However, due to inherent temporal and spatial variability in ecological systems, previous attempts to predict species abundance in novel locations and/or time frames have been largely unsuccessful. The Effective Area Model (EAM) uses change in habitat composition and geometry coupled with response of animals to habitat edges to predict change in species abundance at a landscape scale. Our research goals were to validate EAM abundance predictions in new locations and to develop a calibration framework that enables absolute abundance predictions in novel regions or time frames. For model validation, we compared the EAM to a null model excluding edge effects in terms of accurate prediction of species abundance. The EAM outperformed the null model for 83.3% of species (N = 12) for which it was possible to discern a difference when considering 50 validation sites. Likewise, the EAM outperformed the null model when considering subsets of validation sites categorized on the basis of four variables (isolation, presence of water, region, and focal habitat). Additionally, we explored a framework for producing calibrated models to decrease prediction error given inherent temporal and spatial variability in abundance. We calibrated the EAM to new locations using linear regression between observed and predicted abundance with and without additional habitat covariates. We found that model adjustments for unexplained variability in time and space, as well as variability that can be explained by incorporating additional covariates, improved EAM predictions. Calibrated EAM abundance estimates with additional site-level variables explained a significant amount of variability (P < 0.05) in observed abundance for 17 of 20 species, with R2 values >25% for 12 species, >48% for six species, and >60% for four species when considering all predictive models. The calibration framework described in this paper can be used to predict absolute abundance in sites different from those in which data were collected if the target population of sites to which one would like to statistically infer is sampled in a probabilistic way.

AB - Reliable prediction of the effects of landscape change on species abundance is critical to land managers who must make frequent, rapid decisions with long-term consequences. However, due to inherent temporal and spatial variability in ecological systems, previous attempts to predict species abundance in novel locations and/or time frames have been largely unsuccessful. The Effective Area Model (EAM) uses change in habitat composition and geometry coupled with response of animals to habitat edges to predict change in species abundance at a landscape scale. Our research goals were to validate EAM abundance predictions in new locations and to develop a calibration framework that enables absolute abundance predictions in novel regions or time frames. For model validation, we compared the EAM to a null model excluding edge effects in terms of accurate prediction of species abundance. The EAM outperformed the null model for 83.3% of species (N = 12) for which it was possible to discern a difference when considering 50 validation sites. Likewise, the EAM outperformed the null model when considering subsets of validation sites categorized on the basis of four variables (isolation, presence of water, region, and focal habitat). Additionally, we explored a framework for producing calibrated models to decrease prediction error given inherent temporal and spatial variability in abundance. We calibrated the EAM to new locations using linear regression between observed and predicted abundance with and without additional habitat covariates. We found that model adjustments for unexplained variability in time and space, as well as variability that can be explained by incorporating additional covariates, improved EAM predictions. Calibrated EAM abundance estimates with additional site-level variables explained a significant amount of variability (P < 0.05) in observed abundance for 17 of 20 species, with R2 values >25% for 12 species, >48% for six species, and >60% for four species when considering all predictive models. The calibration framework described in this paper can be used to predict absolute abundance in sites different from those in which data were collected if the target population of sites to which one would like to statistically infer is sampled in a probabilistic way.

KW - Abundance

KW - Birds

KW - Calibration

KW - Effective Area Model (EAM)

KW - Model testing

KW - Null model

KW - Prediction

KW - San Pedro River, Arizona, USA

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746028150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746028150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1090:PAODRB]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1090:PAODRB]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

C2 - 16827005

AN - SCOPUS:33746028150

VL - 16

SP - 1090

EP - 1102

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 3

ER -