Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation

Fábio Albuquerque, Paul Beier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lack of biodiversity data is a major impediment to prioritizing sites for species representation. Because comprehensive species data are not available in any planning area, planners often use surrogates (such as vegetation communities, or mapped occurrences of a well-inventoried taxon) to prioritize sites. We propose and demonstrate the effectiveness of predicted rarity-weighted richness (PRWR) as a surrogate in situations where species inventories may be available for a portion of the planning area. Use of PRWR as a surrogate involves several steps. First, rarity-weighted richness (RWR) is calculated from species inventories for a q% subset of sites. Then random forest models are used to model RWR as a function of freely available environmental variables for that q% subset. This function is then used to calculate PRWR for all sites (including those for which no species inventories are available), and PRWR is used to prioritize all sites. We tested PRWR on plant and bird datasets, using the species accumulation index to measure efficiency of PRWR. Sites with the highest PRWR represented species with median efficiency of 56% (range 32%–77% across six datasets) when q = 20%, and with median efficiency of 39% (range 20%–63%) when q = 10%. An efficiency of 56% means that selecting sites in order of PRWR rank was 56% as effective as having full knowledge of species distributions in PRWR's ability to improve on the number of species represented in the same number of randomly selected sites. Our results suggest that PRWR may be able to help prioritize sites to represent species if a planner has species inventories for 10%–20% of the sites in the planning area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8107-8114
Number of pages8
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume6
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

rarity
planning
species inventory
biogeography
biodiversity
species diversity
environmental factors
vegetation
birds
species richness
bird

Keywords

  • conservation planning
  • prioritization
  • random forest
  • species representation
  • surrogacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation. / Albuquerque, Fábio; Beier, Paul.

In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 6, No. 22, 01.11.2016, p. 8107-8114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{364b18c640dc47b88fafa0a01fe4c0ff,
title = "Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation",
abstract = "Lack of biodiversity data is a major impediment to prioritizing sites for species representation. Because comprehensive species data are not available in any planning area, planners often use surrogates (such as vegetation communities, or mapped occurrences of a well-inventoried taxon) to prioritize sites. We propose and demonstrate the effectiveness of predicted rarity-weighted richness (PRWR) as a surrogate in situations where species inventories may be available for a portion of the planning area. Use of PRWR as a surrogate involves several steps. First, rarity-weighted richness (RWR) is calculated from species inventories for a q{\%} subset of sites. Then random forest models are used to model RWR as a function of freely available environmental variables for that q{\%} subset. This function is then used to calculate PRWR for all sites (including those for which no species inventories are available), and PRWR is used to prioritize all sites. We tested PRWR on plant and bird datasets, using the species accumulation index to measure efficiency of PRWR. Sites with the highest PRWR represented species with median efficiency of 56{\%} (range 32{\%}–77{\%} across six datasets) when q = 20{\%}, and with median efficiency of 39{\%} (range 20{\%}–63{\%}) when q = 10{\%}. An efficiency of 56{\%} means that selecting sites in order of PRWR rank was 56{\%} as effective as having full knowledge of species distributions in PRWR's ability to improve on the number of species represented in the same number of randomly selected sites. Our results suggest that PRWR may be able to help prioritize sites to represent species if a planner has species inventories for 10{\%}–20{\%} of the sites in the planning area.",
keywords = "conservation planning, prioritization, random forest, species representation, surrogacy",
author = "F{\'a}bio Albuquerque and Paul Beier",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.2544",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "8107--8114",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation

AU - Albuquerque, Fábio

AU - Beier, Paul

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Lack of biodiversity data is a major impediment to prioritizing sites for species representation. Because comprehensive species data are not available in any planning area, planners often use surrogates (such as vegetation communities, or mapped occurrences of a well-inventoried taxon) to prioritize sites. We propose and demonstrate the effectiveness of predicted rarity-weighted richness (PRWR) as a surrogate in situations where species inventories may be available for a portion of the planning area. Use of PRWR as a surrogate involves several steps. First, rarity-weighted richness (RWR) is calculated from species inventories for a q% subset of sites. Then random forest models are used to model RWR as a function of freely available environmental variables for that q% subset. This function is then used to calculate PRWR for all sites (including those for which no species inventories are available), and PRWR is used to prioritize all sites. We tested PRWR on plant and bird datasets, using the species accumulation index to measure efficiency of PRWR. Sites with the highest PRWR represented species with median efficiency of 56% (range 32%–77% across six datasets) when q = 20%, and with median efficiency of 39% (range 20%–63%) when q = 10%. An efficiency of 56% means that selecting sites in order of PRWR rank was 56% as effective as having full knowledge of species distributions in PRWR's ability to improve on the number of species represented in the same number of randomly selected sites. Our results suggest that PRWR may be able to help prioritize sites to represent species if a planner has species inventories for 10%–20% of the sites in the planning area.

AB - Lack of biodiversity data is a major impediment to prioritizing sites for species representation. Because comprehensive species data are not available in any planning area, planners often use surrogates (such as vegetation communities, or mapped occurrences of a well-inventoried taxon) to prioritize sites. We propose and demonstrate the effectiveness of predicted rarity-weighted richness (PRWR) as a surrogate in situations where species inventories may be available for a portion of the planning area. Use of PRWR as a surrogate involves several steps. First, rarity-weighted richness (RWR) is calculated from species inventories for a q% subset of sites. Then random forest models are used to model RWR as a function of freely available environmental variables for that q% subset. This function is then used to calculate PRWR for all sites (including those for which no species inventories are available), and PRWR is used to prioritize all sites. We tested PRWR on plant and bird datasets, using the species accumulation index to measure efficiency of PRWR. Sites with the highest PRWR represented species with median efficiency of 56% (range 32%–77% across six datasets) when q = 20%, and with median efficiency of 39% (range 20%–63%) when q = 10%. An efficiency of 56% means that selecting sites in order of PRWR rank was 56% as effective as having full knowledge of species distributions in PRWR's ability to improve on the number of species represented in the same number of randomly selected sites. Our results suggest that PRWR may be able to help prioritize sites to represent species if a planner has species inventories for 10%–20% of the sites in the planning area.

KW - conservation planning

KW - prioritization

KW - random forest

KW - species representation

KW - surrogacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991712488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991712488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.2544

DO - 10.1002/ece3.2544

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 8107

EP - 8114

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 22

ER -