Predators

The social construction of “Stranger-Danger” in Washington state as a form of patriarchal ideology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article critically examines Washington State's Predator Law (1990). The most controversial part of the law provides for the indefinite civil commitment of “sexually violent predators.” Under the legislation, husbands who victimize their wives and children cannot be defined as predators, I argue that the social construction of predators as sick strangers is an ideological construct. This non-conspiratorial construct diverts attention from the fact that male intrafamilial violence is by far the greatest threat to the safety of women and children. These diversionary tendencies in the predator discourse constitute a hitherto scarcely publicized backlash against feminist arguments about the need for criminal laws that work in the interests of all women and children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-68
Number of pages26
JournalWomen and Criminal Justice
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 17 1996

Fingerprint

social construction
ideology
state law
criminal law
husband
wife
legislation
commitment
threat
violence
Law
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Law

Cite this

@article{eab796d381104e16a0301b17d7dc0b52,
title = "Predators: The social construction of “Stranger-Danger” in Washington state as a form of patriarchal ideology",
abstract = "The article critically examines Washington State's Predator Law (1990). The most controversial part of the law provides for the indefinite civil commitment of “sexually violent predators.” Under the legislation, husbands who victimize their wives and children cannot be defined as predators, I argue that the social construction of predators as sick strangers is an ideological construct. This non-conspiratorial construct diverts attention from the fact that male intrafamilial violence is by far the greatest threat to the safety of women and children. These diversionary tendencies in the predator discourse constitute a hitherto scarcely publicized backlash against feminist arguments about the need for criminal laws that work in the interests of all women and children.",
author = "Websdale, {Neil S}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1300/J012v07n02_04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "43--68",
journal = "Women and Criminal Justice",
issn = "0897-4454",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predators

T2 - The social construction of “Stranger-Danger” in Washington state as a form of patriarchal ideology

AU - Websdale, Neil S

PY - 1996/6/17

Y1 - 1996/6/17

N2 - The article critically examines Washington State's Predator Law (1990). The most controversial part of the law provides for the indefinite civil commitment of “sexually violent predators.” Under the legislation, husbands who victimize their wives and children cannot be defined as predators, I argue that the social construction of predators as sick strangers is an ideological construct. This non-conspiratorial construct diverts attention from the fact that male intrafamilial violence is by far the greatest threat to the safety of women and children. These diversionary tendencies in the predator discourse constitute a hitherto scarcely publicized backlash against feminist arguments about the need for criminal laws that work in the interests of all women and children.

AB - The article critically examines Washington State's Predator Law (1990). The most controversial part of the law provides for the indefinite civil commitment of “sexually violent predators.” Under the legislation, husbands who victimize their wives and children cannot be defined as predators, I argue that the social construction of predators as sick strangers is an ideological construct. This non-conspiratorial construct diverts attention from the fact that male intrafamilial violence is by far the greatest threat to the safety of women and children. These diversionary tendencies in the predator discourse constitute a hitherto scarcely publicized backlash against feminist arguments about the need for criminal laws that work in the interests of all women and children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937280262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937280262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J012v07n02_04

DO - 10.1300/J012v07n02_04

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 43

EP - 68

JO - Women and Criminal Justice

JF - Women and Criminal Justice

SN - 0897-4454

IS - 2

ER -