Power, crime and criminology in the new imperial age

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a consequence of the U.S. pursuit of neo-liberal global hegemony in the post-Soviet era, the language of empire has returned to political discourse and social analysis after an eighty-year absence. Although the pursuit of empire and the exertion of imperial control is deeply and demonstrably injurious to the nations and people subjected to this control, orthodox criminology has given relatively little attention to this emerging world of transnational social injury, choosing instead to continue its traditional focus on private crimes of greed, lust and rage. In this essay I detail how legal formalism, methodological individualism, ameliorative motives, mass-communications and the reward structure of orthodox criminology combine to form a meta-theoretical framework that has kept the criminological gaze averted from injurious actions of transnational structures of power. I then offer an alternative framework for a criminology of empire and other power crimes focused on how intersections among economic, political and cultural processes generate social injuries that are analogous to crimes in their nature and consequences, and that, as a result should become as significant a focus of criminological inquiry as the street crimes that now dominate criminological research and writing. What do we do with our knowledge about the suffering of others, and what does this knowledge do to us? -Stanley Cohen

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-325
Number of pages23
JournalCrime, Law and Social Change
Volume51
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Criminology
criminology
Crime
offense
methodological individualism
Rage
mass communication
distribution of power
Wounds and Injuries
social process
Reward
Psychological Stress
hegemony
reward
Language
Communication
Economics
Power (Psychology)
discourse
language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Power, crime and criminology in the new imperial age. / Michalowski Jr, Raymond J.

In: Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 51, No. 3-4, 04.2009, p. 303-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f1948892288411a9b02ac6b32125713,
title = "Power, crime and criminology in the new imperial age",
abstract = "As a consequence of the U.S. pursuit of neo-liberal global hegemony in the post-Soviet era, the language of empire has returned to political discourse and social analysis after an eighty-year absence. Although the pursuit of empire and the exertion of imperial control is deeply and demonstrably injurious to the nations and people subjected to this control, orthodox criminology has given relatively little attention to this emerging world of transnational social injury, choosing instead to continue its traditional focus on private crimes of greed, lust and rage. In this essay I detail how legal formalism, methodological individualism, ameliorative motives, mass-communications and the reward structure of orthodox criminology combine to form a meta-theoretical framework that has kept the criminological gaze averted from injurious actions of transnational structures of power. I then offer an alternative framework for a criminology of empire and other power crimes focused on how intersections among economic, political and cultural processes generate social injuries that are analogous to crimes in their nature and consequences, and that, as a result should become as significant a focus of criminological inquiry as the street crimes that now dominate criminological research and writing. What do we do with our knowledge about the suffering of others, and what does this knowledge do to us? -Stanley Cohen",
author = "{Michalowski Jr}, {Raymond J}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10611-008-9163-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "303--325",
journal = "Crime, Law and Social Change",
issn = "0925-4994",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, crime and criminology in the new imperial age

AU - Michalowski Jr, Raymond J

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - As a consequence of the U.S. pursuit of neo-liberal global hegemony in the post-Soviet era, the language of empire has returned to political discourse and social analysis after an eighty-year absence. Although the pursuit of empire and the exertion of imperial control is deeply and demonstrably injurious to the nations and people subjected to this control, orthodox criminology has given relatively little attention to this emerging world of transnational social injury, choosing instead to continue its traditional focus on private crimes of greed, lust and rage. In this essay I detail how legal formalism, methodological individualism, ameliorative motives, mass-communications and the reward structure of orthodox criminology combine to form a meta-theoretical framework that has kept the criminological gaze averted from injurious actions of transnational structures of power. I then offer an alternative framework for a criminology of empire and other power crimes focused on how intersections among economic, political and cultural processes generate social injuries that are analogous to crimes in their nature and consequences, and that, as a result should become as significant a focus of criminological inquiry as the street crimes that now dominate criminological research and writing. What do we do with our knowledge about the suffering of others, and what does this knowledge do to us? -Stanley Cohen

AB - As a consequence of the U.S. pursuit of neo-liberal global hegemony in the post-Soviet era, the language of empire has returned to political discourse and social analysis after an eighty-year absence. Although the pursuit of empire and the exertion of imperial control is deeply and demonstrably injurious to the nations and people subjected to this control, orthodox criminology has given relatively little attention to this emerging world of transnational social injury, choosing instead to continue its traditional focus on private crimes of greed, lust and rage. In this essay I detail how legal formalism, methodological individualism, ameliorative motives, mass-communications and the reward structure of orthodox criminology combine to form a meta-theoretical framework that has kept the criminological gaze averted from injurious actions of transnational structures of power. I then offer an alternative framework for a criminology of empire and other power crimes focused on how intersections among economic, political and cultural processes generate social injuries that are analogous to crimes in their nature and consequences, and that, as a result should become as significant a focus of criminological inquiry as the street crimes that now dominate criminological research and writing. What do we do with our knowledge about the suffering of others, and what does this knowledge do to us? -Stanley Cohen

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61849137283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61849137283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10611-008-9163-z

DO - 10.1007/s10611-008-9163-z

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 303

EP - 325

JO - Crime, Law and Social Change

JF - Crime, Law and Social Change

SN - 0925-4994

IS - 3-4

ER -