Potential effects of livestock water-trough modifications on bats in Northern Arizona

Stuart R. Tuttle, Carol L Chambers, Tad Theimer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the southwestern United States, livestock water troughs may be the only water source available to bats during dry seasons or periods of drought. We found that 38% of the 90 livestock water troughs we surveyed in northern Arizona, USA, were modified with either fencing to separate pastures or braces to strengthen the structures. We tested if these modifications could affect bat drinking behavior or increase injury risk by simultaneously videotaping modified and unmodified troughs in a series of crossover experiments performed between 1 March and 26 August 2004. The bats that we observed did not avoid modified troughs but required 3-6 times the number of passes to approach the water surface at both troughs with fences and those with support braces. The number of passes required to drink increased with reduced water surface area, suggesting that modifications of smaller troughs may have a greater effect. Small (e.g., Myotis spp.) and large (e.g., pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)) bats responded similarly in the experiments. These effects may be energetically expensive for bats, especially during periods of high energy demands, such as pregnancy and lactation. Although we did not document any injuries or mortalities, 16 bats contacted wires at modified troughs with smaller surface area. This suggests that modifications of smaller troughs may pose higher risks of injury. To reduce these risks, we recommend removing modifications on water troughs whenever feasible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-608
Number of pages7
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

water troughs
bat
Chiroptera
livestock
trough
water
surface area
dry period (lactation)
Southwestern United States
Myotis
fences
effect
drinking
wire
lactation
dry season
pregnancy
drought
pastures
pasture

Keywords

  • Antrozous pallidus
  • Arizona
  • Energetic costs
  • Fences
  • Flight Path
  • Myotis
  • Pallid bat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Potential effects of livestock water-trough modifications on bats in Northern Arizona. / Tuttle, Stuart R.; Chambers, Carol L; Theimer, Tad.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 3, 10.2006, p. 602-608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{415a5d01ff094607b7eaecad16ec6b3f,
title = "Potential effects of livestock water-trough modifications on bats in Northern Arizona",
abstract = "In the southwestern United States, livestock water troughs may be the only water source available to bats during dry seasons or periods of drought. We found that 38{\%} of the 90 livestock water troughs we surveyed in northern Arizona, USA, were modified with either fencing to separate pastures or braces to strengthen the structures. We tested if these modifications could affect bat drinking behavior or increase injury risk by simultaneously videotaping modified and unmodified troughs in a series of crossover experiments performed between 1 March and 26 August 2004. The bats that we observed did not avoid modified troughs but required 3-6 times the number of passes to approach the water surface at both troughs with fences and those with support braces. The number of passes required to drink increased with reduced water surface area, suggesting that modifications of smaller troughs may have a greater effect. Small (e.g., Myotis spp.) and large (e.g., pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)) bats responded similarly in the experiments. These effects may be energetically expensive for bats, especially during periods of high energy demands, such as pregnancy and lactation. Although we did not document any injuries or mortalities, 16 bats contacted wires at modified troughs with smaller surface area. This suggests that modifications of smaller troughs may pose higher risks of injury. To reduce these risks, we recommend removing modifications on water troughs whenever feasible.",
keywords = "Antrozous pallidus, Arizona, Energetic costs, Fences, Flight Path, Myotis, Pallid bat",
author = "Tuttle, {Stuart R.} and Chambers, {Carol L} and Tad Theimer",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[602:PEOLWM]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "602--608",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential effects of livestock water-trough modifications on bats in Northern Arizona

AU - Tuttle, Stuart R.

AU - Chambers, Carol L

AU - Theimer, Tad

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - In the southwestern United States, livestock water troughs may be the only water source available to bats during dry seasons or periods of drought. We found that 38% of the 90 livestock water troughs we surveyed in northern Arizona, USA, were modified with either fencing to separate pastures or braces to strengthen the structures. We tested if these modifications could affect bat drinking behavior or increase injury risk by simultaneously videotaping modified and unmodified troughs in a series of crossover experiments performed between 1 March and 26 August 2004. The bats that we observed did not avoid modified troughs but required 3-6 times the number of passes to approach the water surface at both troughs with fences and those with support braces. The number of passes required to drink increased with reduced water surface area, suggesting that modifications of smaller troughs may have a greater effect. Small (e.g., Myotis spp.) and large (e.g., pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)) bats responded similarly in the experiments. These effects may be energetically expensive for bats, especially during periods of high energy demands, such as pregnancy and lactation. Although we did not document any injuries or mortalities, 16 bats contacted wires at modified troughs with smaller surface area. This suggests that modifications of smaller troughs may pose higher risks of injury. To reduce these risks, we recommend removing modifications on water troughs whenever feasible.

AB - In the southwestern United States, livestock water troughs may be the only water source available to bats during dry seasons or periods of drought. We found that 38% of the 90 livestock water troughs we surveyed in northern Arizona, USA, were modified with either fencing to separate pastures or braces to strengthen the structures. We tested if these modifications could affect bat drinking behavior or increase injury risk by simultaneously videotaping modified and unmodified troughs in a series of crossover experiments performed between 1 March and 26 August 2004. The bats that we observed did not avoid modified troughs but required 3-6 times the number of passes to approach the water surface at both troughs with fences and those with support braces. The number of passes required to drink increased with reduced water surface area, suggesting that modifications of smaller troughs may have a greater effect. Small (e.g., Myotis spp.) and large (e.g., pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus)) bats responded similarly in the experiments. These effects may be energetically expensive for bats, especially during periods of high energy demands, such as pregnancy and lactation. Although we did not document any injuries or mortalities, 16 bats contacted wires at modified troughs with smaller surface area. This suggests that modifications of smaller troughs may pose higher risks of injury. To reduce these risks, we recommend removing modifications on water troughs whenever feasible.

KW - Antrozous pallidus

KW - Arizona

KW - Energetic costs

KW - Fences

KW - Flight Path

KW - Myotis

KW - Pallid bat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751240094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751240094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[602:PEOLWM]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[602:PEOLWM]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33751240094

VL - 34

SP - 602

EP - 608

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 3

ER -