Post-fire seeding in western united states forests: Perspectives of resource managers

Donna L. Peppin, Anne L. Mottek-Lucas, Peter Z Fule

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent reviews have brought into question the effectiveness of post-fire seeding in mitigating soil erosion and nonnative plant invasions, yet millions of dollars continue to be spent annually on post-fire seeding as a primary postfire rehabilitation response. Overall policy development and implementation direction regarding post-fire rehabilitation treatments rests heavily on nationaland regional-level natural resource managers. We conducted personal interviews and telephone surveys with the population of nationaland regional-level natural resource managers (N = 6 and N = 17, respectively) involved directly in post-fire seeding activities on federally managed lands. We found that 71 % of the respondents felt that information on the long-term effects of seeding was not sufficient. Respondents' perception about the effectiveness of seeding in curtailing spread of non-native species was mixed: 64 % felt seeding was very or somewhat effective and 36 % felt it was not effective at all. Additional monitoring and research is needed that utilizes cost-benefit analyses for areas where values at risk are high. These analyses include whether or not to seed, seeding implementation methods, seed mix composition, and effectiveness of seeding in curtailing non-native species spread and reducing soil erosion. The majority of information available on seeding comes from short-term studies (≤2 years). Testimonies and recent reviews demonstrate the need for review and refinement of current policy that includes stronger mandates and adequate funding for dedicated staff to conduct long-term monitoring spanning 5 years to 10 years. Land managers and scientists agree that there is a need for data on the long-term effectiveness of seeding treatments as well as further inquiry regarding effectiveness of seeding in mitigating non-native species invasions. Stronger communication and collaboration between these two groups would allow researchers to develop well-replicated monitoring designs for areas that land managers consider to be high priority for intensive quantitative longterm research of post-fire treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-42
Number of pages12
JournalFire Ecology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

state forests
Western United States
seeding
managers
sowing
resource
rehabilitation (people)
soil erosion
natural resources
monitoring
state forest
natural resource
seed
development policy
communication (human)
policy development
seeds
funding
long term effects
interviews

Keywords

  • BAER
  • Effectiveness monitoring
  • Emergency stabilization
  • Native seed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Post-fire seeding in western united states forests : Perspectives of resource managers. / Peppin, Donna L.; Mottek-Lucas, Anne L.; Fule, Peter Z.

In: Fire Ecology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2014, p. 31-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peppin, Donna L. ; Mottek-Lucas, Anne L. ; Fule, Peter Z. / Post-fire seeding in western united states forests : Perspectives of resource managers. In: Fire Ecology. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 31-42.
@article{0cd0aa5801984267b1a5b6434a017104,
title = "Post-fire seeding in western united states forests: Perspectives of resource managers",
abstract = "Recent reviews have brought into question the effectiveness of post-fire seeding in mitigating soil erosion and nonnative plant invasions, yet millions of dollars continue to be spent annually on post-fire seeding as a primary postfire rehabilitation response. Overall policy development and implementation direction regarding post-fire rehabilitation treatments rests heavily on nationaland regional-level natural resource managers. We conducted personal interviews and telephone surveys with the population of nationaland regional-level natural resource managers (N = 6 and N = 17, respectively) involved directly in post-fire seeding activities on federally managed lands. We found that 71 {\%} of the respondents felt that information on the long-term effects of seeding was not sufficient. Respondents' perception about the effectiveness of seeding in curtailing spread of non-native species was mixed: 64 {\%} felt seeding was very or somewhat effective and 36 {\%} felt it was not effective at all. Additional monitoring and research is needed that utilizes cost-benefit analyses for areas where values at risk are high. These analyses include whether or not to seed, seeding implementation methods, seed mix composition, and effectiveness of seeding in curtailing non-native species spread and reducing soil erosion. The majority of information available on seeding comes from short-term studies (≤2 years). Testimonies and recent reviews demonstrate the need for review and refinement of current policy that includes stronger mandates and adequate funding for dedicated staff to conduct long-term monitoring spanning 5 years to 10 years. Land managers and scientists agree that there is a need for data on the long-term effectiveness of seeding treatments as well as further inquiry regarding effectiveness of seeding in mitigating non-native species invasions. Stronger communication and collaboration between these two groups would allow researchers to develop well-replicated monitoring designs for areas that land managers consider to be high priority for intensive quantitative longterm research of post-fire treatments.",
keywords = "BAER, Effectiveness monitoring, Emergency stabilization, Native seed",
author = "Peppin, {Donna L.} and Mottek-Lucas, {Anne L.} and Fule, {Peter Z}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4996/fireecology.1001031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "31--42",
journal = "Fire Ecology",
issn = "1933-9747",
publisher = "Association for Fire Ecology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-fire seeding in western united states forests

T2 - Perspectives of resource managers

AU - Peppin, Donna L.

AU - Mottek-Lucas, Anne L.

AU - Fule, Peter Z

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent reviews have brought into question the effectiveness of post-fire seeding in mitigating soil erosion and nonnative plant invasions, yet millions of dollars continue to be spent annually on post-fire seeding as a primary postfire rehabilitation response. Overall policy development and implementation direction regarding post-fire rehabilitation treatments rests heavily on nationaland regional-level natural resource managers. We conducted personal interviews and telephone surveys with the population of nationaland regional-level natural resource managers (N = 6 and N = 17, respectively) involved directly in post-fire seeding activities on federally managed lands. We found that 71 % of the respondents felt that information on the long-term effects of seeding was not sufficient. Respondents' perception about the effectiveness of seeding in curtailing spread of non-native species was mixed: 64 % felt seeding was very or somewhat effective and 36 % felt it was not effective at all. Additional monitoring and research is needed that utilizes cost-benefit analyses for areas where values at risk are high. These analyses include whether or not to seed, seeding implementation methods, seed mix composition, and effectiveness of seeding in curtailing non-native species spread and reducing soil erosion. The majority of information available on seeding comes from short-term studies (≤2 years). Testimonies and recent reviews demonstrate the need for review and refinement of current policy that includes stronger mandates and adequate funding for dedicated staff to conduct long-term monitoring spanning 5 years to 10 years. Land managers and scientists agree that there is a need for data on the long-term effectiveness of seeding treatments as well as further inquiry regarding effectiveness of seeding in mitigating non-native species invasions. Stronger communication and collaboration between these two groups would allow researchers to develop well-replicated monitoring designs for areas that land managers consider to be high priority for intensive quantitative longterm research of post-fire treatments.

AB - Recent reviews have brought into question the effectiveness of post-fire seeding in mitigating soil erosion and nonnative plant invasions, yet millions of dollars continue to be spent annually on post-fire seeding as a primary postfire rehabilitation response. Overall policy development and implementation direction regarding post-fire rehabilitation treatments rests heavily on nationaland regional-level natural resource managers. We conducted personal interviews and telephone surveys with the population of nationaland regional-level natural resource managers (N = 6 and N = 17, respectively) involved directly in post-fire seeding activities on federally managed lands. We found that 71 % of the respondents felt that information on the long-term effects of seeding was not sufficient. Respondents' perception about the effectiveness of seeding in curtailing spread of non-native species was mixed: 64 % felt seeding was very or somewhat effective and 36 % felt it was not effective at all. Additional monitoring and research is needed that utilizes cost-benefit analyses for areas where values at risk are high. These analyses include whether or not to seed, seeding implementation methods, seed mix composition, and effectiveness of seeding in curtailing non-native species spread and reducing soil erosion. The majority of information available on seeding comes from short-term studies (≤2 years). Testimonies and recent reviews demonstrate the need for review and refinement of current policy that includes stronger mandates and adequate funding for dedicated staff to conduct long-term monitoring spanning 5 years to 10 years. Land managers and scientists agree that there is a need for data on the long-term effectiveness of seeding treatments as well as further inquiry regarding effectiveness of seeding in mitigating non-native species invasions. Stronger communication and collaboration between these two groups would allow researchers to develop well-replicated monitoring designs for areas that land managers consider to be high priority for intensive quantitative longterm research of post-fire treatments.

KW - BAER

KW - Effectiveness monitoring

KW - Emergency stabilization

KW - Native seed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899444118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899444118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4996/fireecology.1001031

DO - 10.4996/fireecology.1001031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899444118

VL - 10

SP - 31

EP - 42

JO - Fire Ecology

JF - Fire Ecology

SN - 1933-9747

IS - 1

ER -