Ponderosa pine restoration and turkey roost site use in northern Arizona

Steven L. Martin, Tad Theimer, Peter Z Fule

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecological restoration of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in the southwestern United States is a relatively new, adaptive management practice that potentially alters wildlife habitat during and immediately after restoration treatments. To determine whether restoration treatments affected Merriam's wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) use of roost sites, we relocated 91 of 120 turkey roost sites that originally had been mapped in 1985 in the Uinkaret Mountains of northern Arizona. We compared current turkey use of historical roost sites in stands that had been thinned and burned between 1995 and 2002 to adjacent (<800 m away) and distant (>800 m) stands. In 2002, 23 historical roosts were still in use, and in 2003, 13 were still in use, 5 of which had not been used in 2002. The number of historical roost sites still in use among treated, adjacent, and distant stands did not differ from that expected based on the total number of historical roosts in each stand type. We also searched for new roosts while traveling between historical roost sites and found 2.2 new roosts per hour searched in treated stands, 1.5 in adjacent stands, and 1.0 in distant stands. As expected, active roost sites in treated stands had significantly lower basal area, fewer stems, and less canopy cover compared to roost sites in untreated areas. However, roost trees in treated and untreated stands did not differ in diameter at breast height, height, or distance to the lower limb, indicating that treatment did not affect these characteristics. Several factors unique to our study site may have influenced our results: treated areas represented only 5% of total habitat available, treatments occurred primarily on flat areas and not on ridges or slopes, and treatments were implemented over several years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)859-864
Number of pages6
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

roost site
historic sites
Pinus ponderosa
Southwestern United States
wildlife habitats
ecological restoration
active sites
branches
tree and stand measurements
basal area
mountains
canopy
stems
habitats
adaptive management
restoration
limb
management practice
stem
mountain

Keywords

  • Meleagris gallopavo
  • Pinus ponderosa
  • Restoration
  • Roost site

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Ponderosa pine restoration and turkey roost site use in northern Arizona. / Martin, Steven L.; Theimer, Tad; Fule, Peter Z.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 859-864.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d207a02f005461fb143b935f0d1ef69,
title = "Ponderosa pine restoration and turkey roost site use in northern Arizona",
abstract = "Ecological restoration of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in the southwestern United States is a relatively new, adaptive management practice that potentially alters wildlife habitat during and immediately after restoration treatments. To determine whether restoration treatments affected Merriam's wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) use of roost sites, we relocated 91 of 120 turkey roost sites that originally had been mapped in 1985 in the Uinkaret Mountains of northern Arizona. We compared current turkey use of historical roost sites in stands that had been thinned and burned between 1995 and 2002 to adjacent (<800 m away) and distant (>800 m) stands. In 2002, 23 historical roosts were still in use, and in 2003, 13 were still in use, 5 of which had not been used in 2002. The number of historical roost sites still in use among treated, adjacent, and distant stands did not differ from that expected based on the total number of historical roosts in each stand type. We also searched for new roosts while traveling between historical roost sites and found 2.2 new roosts per hour searched in treated stands, 1.5 in adjacent stands, and 1.0 in distant stands. As expected, active roost sites in treated stands had significantly lower basal area, fewer stems, and less canopy cover compared to roost sites in untreated areas. However, roost trees in treated and untreated stands did not differ in diameter at breast height, height, or distance to the lower limb, indicating that treatment did not affect these characteristics. Several factors unique to our study site may have influenced our results: treated areas represented only 5{\%} of total habitat available, treatments occurred primarily on flat areas and not on ridges or slopes, and treatments were implemented over several years.",
keywords = "Meleagris gallopavo, Pinus ponderosa, Restoration, Roost site",
author = "Martin, {Steven L.} and Tad Theimer and Fule, {Peter Z}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[859:PPRATR]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "859--864",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ponderosa pine restoration and turkey roost site use in northern Arizona

AU - Martin, Steven L.

AU - Theimer, Tad

AU - Fule, Peter Z

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Ecological restoration of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in the southwestern United States is a relatively new, adaptive management practice that potentially alters wildlife habitat during and immediately after restoration treatments. To determine whether restoration treatments affected Merriam's wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) use of roost sites, we relocated 91 of 120 turkey roost sites that originally had been mapped in 1985 in the Uinkaret Mountains of northern Arizona. We compared current turkey use of historical roost sites in stands that had been thinned and burned between 1995 and 2002 to adjacent (<800 m away) and distant (>800 m) stands. In 2002, 23 historical roosts were still in use, and in 2003, 13 were still in use, 5 of which had not been used in 2002. The number of historical roost sites still in use among treated, adjacent, and distant stands did not differ from that expected based on the total number of historical roosts in each stand type. We also searched for new roosts while traveling between historical roost sites and found 2.2 new roosts per hour searched in treated stands, 1.5 in adjacent stands, and 1.0 in distant stands. As expected, active roost sites in treated stands had significantly lower basal area, fewer stems, and less canopy cover compared to roost sites in untreated areas. However, roost trees in treated and untreated stands did not differ in diameter at breast height, height, or distance to the lower limb, indicating that treatment did not affect these characteristics. Several factors unique to our study site may have influenced our results: treated areas represented only 5% of total habitat available, treatments occurred primarily on flat areas and not on ridges or slopes, and treatments were implemented over several years.

AB - Ecological restoration of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in the southwestern United States is a relatively new, adaptive management practice that potentially alters wildlife habitat during and immediately after restoration treatments. To determine whether restoration treatments affected Merriam's wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) use of roost sites, we relocated 91 of 120 turkey roost sites that originally had been mapped in 1985 in the Uinkaret Mountains of northern Arizona. We compared current turkey use of historical roost sites in stands that had been thinned and burned between 1995 and 2002 to adjacent (<800 m away) and distant (>800 m) stands. In 2002, 23 historical roosts were still in use, and in 2003, 13 were still in use, 5 of which had not been used in 2002. The number of historical roost sites still in use among treated, adjacent, and distant stands did not differ from that expected based on the total number of historical roosts in each stand type. We also searched for new roosts while traveling between historical roost sites and found 2.2 new roosts per hour searched in treated stands, 1.5 in adjacent stands, and 1.0 in distant stands. As expected, active roost sites in treated stands had significantly lower basal area, fewer stems, and less canopy cover compared to roost sites in untreated areas. However, roost trees in treated and untreated stands did not differ in diameter at breast height, height, or distance to the lower limb, indicating that treatment did not affect these characteristics. Several factors unique to our study site may have influenced our results: treated areas represented only 5% of total habitat available, treatments occurred primarily on flat areas and not on ridges or slopes, and treatments were implemented over several years.

KW - Meleagris gallopavo

KW - Pinus ponderosa

KW - Restoration

KW - Roost site

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344449187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30344449187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[859:PPRATR]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[859:PPRATR]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 859

EP - 864

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 3

ER -