Pine-oak forest dynamics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA

Peter Z Fule, Daniel C. Laughlin, Wallace W Covington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Five years after ecological restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine-Gambel oak forest, we re-measured permanent plots to assess changes in forest structure and understory vegetation. The treatments were (1) thinning to emulate pre-fire-exclusion conditions + prescribed burning (FULL restoration), (2) minimal thinning around old trees + burning (MIN), (3) burning alone (BURN), and (4) CONTROL. We expected tree growth and understory abundance to be greatest in the least dense (FULL) treatment. Probably due to drought as well as treatment effects, basal area, tree density, and canopy cover declined 3-20% over the 2000-2004 time period. Smaller trees and those with greater crown scorch were most likely to die. Tree growth differed significantly by species and treatment; ponderosa pine grew faster than oak and the FULL treatment had the highest pine basal area increment and quadratic mean diameter. Understory plant cover and richness differed only slightly by treatment, generally varying more with pre-existing conditions and climate. Exotic species were present but exotic cover and richness were less than that reported after comparable treatments or wildfires in the region. Compared to historical reference conditions at the time of the last surface fire, 1887, the FULL was less dense and all treatments were relatively low in basal area, due to 20th century harvesting of most of the large pines. At current growth rates and without additional mortality, the FULL treatment may be similar to historical forest structures in ∼20 years. Tree densities in other treatments are expected to remain above historical levels. The dynamics of stands following alternative restoration treatments are of high interest for management because large areas have been proposed for treatment but there is limited data on effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-145
Number of pages17
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume218
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 24 2005

Fingerprint

forest dynamics
ecological restoration
Quercus
Pinus
basal area
understory
Pinus ponderosa
thinning (plants)
tree growth
Quercus gambelii
scorch
thinning
prescribed burning
ground cover plants
wildfires
tree crown
drought
canopy
climate
wildfire

Keywords

  • Ecological restoration
  • Kaibab National Forest
  • Ponderosa pine
  • Prescribed burning
  • Thinning
  • Understory response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Forestry
  • Ecology

Cite this

Pine-oak forest dynamics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA. / Fule, Peter Z; Laughlin, Daniel C.; Covington, Wallace W.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 218, No. 1-3, 24.10.2005, p. 129-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90d2a21bc2ab4463a539ec4264d945b7,
title = "Pine-oak forest dynamics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA",
abstract = "Five years after ecological restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine-Gambel oak forest, we re-measured permanent plots to assess changes in forest structure and understory vegetation. The treatments were (1) thinning to emulate pre-fire-exclusion conditions + prescribed burning (FULL restoration), (2) minimal thinning around old trees + burning (MIN), (3) burning alone (BURN), and (4) CONTROL. We expected tree growth and understory abundance to be greatest in the least dense (FULL) treatment. Probably due to drought as well as treatment effects, basal area, tree density, and canopy cover declined 3-20{\%} over the 2000-2004 time period. Smaller trees and those with greater crown scorch were most likely to die. Tree growth differed significantly by species and treatment; ponderosa pine grew faster than oak and the FULL treatment had the highest pine basal area increment and quadratic mean diameter. Understory plant cover and richness differed only slightly by treatment, generally varying more with pre-existing conditions and climate. Exotic species were present but exotic cover and richness were less than that reported after comparable treatments or wildfires in the region. Compared to historical reference conditions at the time of the last surface fire, 1887, the FULL was less dense and all treatments were relatively low in basal area, due to 20th century harvesting of most of the large pines. At current growth rates and without additional mortality, the FULL treatment may be similar to historical forest structures in ∼20 years. Tree densities in other treatments are expected to remain above historical levels. The dynamics of stands following alternative restoration treatments are of high interest for management because large areas have been proposed for treatment but there is limited data on effects.",
keywords = "Ecological restoration, Kaibab National Forest, Ponderosa pine, Prescribed burning, Thinning, Understory response",
author = "Fule, {Peter Z} and Laughlin, {Daniel C.} and Covington, {Wallace W}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "218",
pages = "129--145",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pine-oak forest dynamics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA

AU - Fule, Peter Z

AU - Laughlin, Daniel C.

AU - Covington, Wallace W

PY - 2005/10/24

Y1 - 2005/10/24

N2 - Five years after ecological restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine-Gambel oak forest, we re-measured permanent plots to assess changes in forest structure and understory vegetation. The treatments were (1) thinning to emulate pre-fire-exclusion conditions + prescribed burning (FULL restoration), (2) minimal thinning around old trees + burning (MIN), (3) burning alone (BURN), and (4) CONTROL. We expected tree growth and understory abundance to be greatest in the least dense (FULL) treatment. Probably due to drought as well as treatment effects, basal area, tree density, and canopy cover declined 3-20% over the 2000-2004 time period. Smaller trees and those with greater crown scorch were most likely to die. Tree growth differed significantly by species and treatment; ponderosa pine grew faster than oak and the FULL treatment had the highest pine basal area increment and quadratic mean diameter. Understory plant cover and richness differed only slightly by treatment, generally varying more with pre-existing conditions and climate. Exotic species were present but exotic cover and richness were less than that reported after comparable treatments or wildfires in the region. Compared to historical reference conditions at the time of the last surface fire, 1887, the FULL was less dense and all treatments were relatively low in basal area, due to 20th century harvesting of most of the large pines. At current growth rates and without additional mortality, the FULL treatment may be similar to historical forest structures in ∼20 years. Tree densities in other treatments are expected to remain above historical levels. The dynamics of stands following alternative restoration treatments are of high interest for management because large areas have been proposed for treatment but there is limited data on effects.

AB - Five years after ecological restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine-Gambel oak forest, we re-measured permanent plots to assess changes in forest structure and understory vegetation. The treatments were (1) thinning to emulate pre-fire-exclusion conditions + prescribed burning (FULL restoration), (2) minimal thinning around old trees + burning (MIN), (3) burning alone (BURN), and (4) CONTROL. We expected tree growth and understory abundance to be greatest in the least dense (FULL) treatment. Probably due to drought as well as treatment effects, basal area, tree density, and canopy cover declined 3-20% over the 2000-2004 time period. Smaller trees and those with greater crown scorch were most likely to die. Tree growth differed significantly by species and treatment; ponderosa pine grew faster than oak and the FULL treatment had the highest pine basal area increment and quadratic mean diameter. Understory plant cover and richness differed only slightly by treatment, generally varying more with pre-existing conditions and climate. Exotic species were present but exotic cover and richness were less than that reported after comparable treatments or wildfires in the region. Compared to historical reference conditions at the time of the last surface fire, 1887, the FULL was less dense and all treatments were relatively low in basal area, due to 20th century harvesting of most of the large pines. At current growth rates and without additional mortality, the FULL treatment may be similar to historical forest structures in ∼20 years. Tree densities in other treatments are expected to remain above historical levels. The dynamics of stands following alternative restoration treatments are of high interest for management because large areas have been proposed for treatment but there is limited data on effects.

KW - Ecological restoration

KW - Kaibab National Forest

KW - Ponderosa pine

KW - Prescribed burning

KW - Thinning

KW - Understory response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444618541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26444618541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.07.005

M3 - Article

VL - 218

SP - 129

EP - 145

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

IS - 1-3

ER -