"Physicians of the forest"

A rhetorical critique of the Bush Healthy Forest Initiative

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores national debate over federal fire policy that emerged during the 2002 fire season in the United States and the ensuing shift in ideology that culminated in the Bush Administration's Healthy Forest Initiative. Several dimensions of the wild fire debate prompt the attention of environmental scholars in multiple disciplines. At one level the debate focuses upon rhetorical efforts to redefine the legitimate stakeholders responsible for formulating and implementing federal policy. At a deeper level, the debate highlights the way in which humans define wilderness, apply science, and position them within nature itself. The Healthy Forest Initiative represents a significant change in national forest management, logging, and fire suppression policies and offers a compelling case study of environmental rhetoric and its role in public policy debates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalElectronic Green Journal
Issue number19
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

physician
federal policy
suppression
rhetoric
public policy
ideology
stakeholder
forest management
science
management
policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{a13c89c9f5fb48e1bcb492450416e4d8,
title = "{"}Physicians of the forest{"}: A rhetorical critique of the Bush Healthy Forest Initiative",
abstract = "This article explores national debate over federal fire policy that emerged during the 2002 fire season in the United States and the ensuing shift in ideology that culminated in the Bush Administration's Healthy Forest Initiative. Several dimensions of the wild fire debate prompt the attention of environmental scholars in multiple disciplines. At one level the debate focuses upon rhetorical efforts to redefine the legitimate stakeholders responsible for formulating and implementing federal policy. At a deeper level, the debate highlights the way in which humans define wilderness, apply science, and position them within nature itself. The Healthy Forest Initiative represents a significant change in national forest management, logging, and fire suppression policies and offers a compelling case study of environmental rhetoric and its role in public policy debates.",
author = "Short, {Calvin B} and Dayle Hardy-Short",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Electronic Green Journal",
issn = "1076-7975",
publisher = "University of Idaho Library",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Physicians of the forest"

T2 - A rhetorical critique of the Bush Healthy Forest Initiative

AU - Short, Calvin B

AU - Hardy-Short, Dayle

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This article explores national debate over federal fire policy that emerged during the 2002 fire season in the United States and the ensuing shift in ideology that culminated in the Bush Administration's Healthy Forest Initiative. Several dimensions of the wild fire debate prompt the attention of environmental scholars in multiple disciplines. At one level the debate focuses upon rhetorical efforts to redefine the legitimate stakeholders responsible for formulating and implementing federal policy. At a deeper level, the debate highlights the way in which humans define wilderness, apply science, and position them within nature itself. The Healthy Forest Initiative represents a significant change in national forest management, logging, and fire suppression policies and offers a compelling case study of environmental rhetoric and its role in public policy debates.

AB - This article explores national debate over federal fire policy that emerged during the 2002 fire season in the United States and the ensuing shift in ideology that culminated in the Bush Administration's Healthy Forest Initiative. Several dimensions of the wild fire debate prompt the attention of environmental scholars in multiple disciplines. At one level the debate focuses upon rhetorical efforts to redefine the legitimate stakeholders responsible for formulating and implementing federal policy. At a deeper level, the debate highlights the way in which humans define wilderness, apply science, and position them within nature itself. The Healthy Forest Initiative represents a significant change in national forest management, logging, and fire suppression policies and offers a compelling case study of environmental rhetoric and its role in public policy debates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345832159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345832159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

JO - Electronic Green Journal

JF - Electronic Green Journal

SN - 1076-7975

IS - 19

ER -