Personalities and institutions in Americanist archaeology, 1850-1950

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Between 1850 and 1950 Americanist archaeology evolved from an inchoate blend of antiquarianism, literature, and field digging undertaken by untrained but enthusiastic amateurs into an increasingly disciplined and institutionalized field of inquiry. While personal speculation and style became less pronounced, institutional (university/museum) support provided financial grounds for long-term research and teaching agendas. At the same time, while institutionalized archaeology certainly did not eliminate strong personality differences and professional disagreements, it did provide channels within which to confront and resolve them. The overlapping generations of Ephraim Squier, Alfred Maudslay, and Byron Cummings clearly demonstrate this trajectory of professionalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-135
Number of pages14
JournalReviews in Anthropology
Volume37
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

archaeology
personality
amateur
professionalization
speculation
museum
university
Teaching
literature

Keywords

  • Americanist archaeology
  • Discipline
  • Institutionalization
  • Professionalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Personalities and institutions in Americanist archaeology, 1850-1950. / Hinsley Jr, Curtis M.

In: Reviews in Anthropology, Vol. 37, No. 2-3, 04.2008, p. 122-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{365b2076ae5a4fc398a60a0a8f69cdd3,
title = "Personalities and institutions in Americanist archaeology, 1850-1950",
abstract = "Between 1850 and 1950 Americanist archaeology evolved from an inchoate blend of antiquarianism, literature, and field digging undertaken by untrained but enthusiastic amateurs into an increasingly disciplined and institutionalized field of inquiry. While personal speculation and style became less pronounced, institutional (university/museum) support provided financial grounds for long-term research and teaching agendas. At the same time, while institutionalized archaeology certainly did not eliminate strong personality differences and professional disagreements, it did provide channels within which to confront and resolve them. The overlapping generations of Ephraim Squier, Alfred Maudslay, and Byron Cummings clearly demonstrate this trajectory of professionalization.",
keywords = "Americanist archaeology, Discipline, Institutionalization, Professionalization",
author = "{Hinsley Jr}, {Curtis M}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00938150802038992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "122--135",
journal = "Reviews in Anthropology",
issn = "0093-8157",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personalities and institutions in Americanist archaeology, 1850-1950

AU - Hinsley Jr, Curtis M

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Between 1850 and 1950 Americanist archaeology evolved from an inchoate blend of antiquarianism, literature, and field digging undertaken by untrained but enthusiastic amateurs into an increasingly disciplined and institutionalized field of inquiry. While personal speculation and style became less pronounced, institutional (university/museum) support provided financial grounds for long-term research and teaching agendas. At the same time, while institutionalized archaeology certainly did not eliminate strong personality differences and professional disagreements, it did provide channels within which to confront and resolve them. The overlapping generations of Ephraim Squier, Alfred Maudslay, and Byron Cummings clearly demonstrate this trajectory of professionalization.

AB - Between 1850 and 1950 Americanist archaeology evolved from an inchoate blend of antiquarianism, literature, and field digging undertaken by untrained but enthusiastic amateurs into an increasingly disciplined and institutionalized field of inquiry. While personal speculation and style became less pronounced, institutional (university/museum) support provided financial grounds for long-term research and teaching agendas. At the same time, while institutionalized archaeology certainly did not eliminate strong personality differences and professional disagreements, it did provide channels within which to confront and resolve them. The overlapping generations of Ephraim Squier, Alfred Maudslay, and Byron Cummings clearly demonstrate this trajectory of professionalization.

KW - Americanist archaeology

KW - Discipline

KW - Institutionalization

KW - Professionalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47349112606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47349112606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00938150802038992

DO - 10.1080/00938150802038992

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:47349112606

VL - 37

SP - 122

EP - 135

JO - Reviews in Anthropology

JF - Reviews in Anthropology

SN - 0093-8157

IS - 2-3

ER -