Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest

Thomas D Sisk, John W. Prather, Haydee M. Hampton, Ethan N. Aumack, Yaguang Xu, Brett G Dickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past 5 decades, stand-replacing crown fires have increased in size and frequency throughout the long-needled pine forests of the American Southwest. Suppression of frequent, low-intensity ground fires has resulted in dense stands of fire-prone trees over large areas. Efforts to restore forest structure to conditions that would permit a return to historical fire regimes, characterized by frequent ground fire, are hindered by the inability of managers and the public to compare the effects of alternative forest management practices on fire behavior and a host of other issues. Currently, forest management is mired in controversy, endangering ecosystem function, biodiversity, public safety, and municipal watersheds. Our research program, motivated by the need to examine cumulative effects of many independent management decisions over large planning areas, focuses on the development of spatial data and modeling tools that enable diverse stakeholders to work together to guide landscape-scale planning efforts. Data layers describing forest composition and structure facilitate modeling of fire threat and wildlife habitat over areas of several hundred thousand hectares. Modeling alternative forest management scenarios via a collaborative, public process fosters informed discourse and helps conflicting parties forge appropriate policy and identify management responses that meet restoration objectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)300-310
Number of pages11
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume78
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 28 2006

Fingerprint

Southwestern United States
Pinus ponderosa
ecosystems
ecosystem
forest management
planning
public safety
fire behavior
wildlife habitats
fire regime
modeling
spatial data
research programs
stakeholders
tree crown
coniferous forests
ecosystem function
managers
research program
analysis

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • Collaboration
  • Fire
  • Forest policy
  • Landscape assessment
  • Modeling
  • Planning
  • Public lands
  • Stakeholder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest. / Sisk, Thomas D; Prather, John W.; Hampton, Haydee M.; Aumack, Ethan N.; Xu, Yaguang; Dickson, Brett G.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 78, No. 4, 28.11.2006, p. 300-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sisk, Thomas D ; Prather, John W. ; Hampton, Haydee M. ; Aumack, Ethan N. ; Xu, Yaguang ; Dickson, Brett G. / Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2006 ; Vol. 78, No. 4. pp. 300-310.
@article{25b620678892460c91ccf75c5b796505,
title = "Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest",
abstract = "Over the past 5 decades, stand-replacing crown fires have increased in size and frequency throughout the long-needled pine forests of the American Southwest. Suppression of frequent, low-intensity ground fires has resulted in dense stands of fire-prone trees over large areas. Efforts to restore forest structure to conditions that would permit a return to historical fire regimes, characterized by frequent ground fire, are hindered by the inability of managers and the public to compare the effects of alternative forest management practices on fire behavior and a host of other issues. Currently, forest management is mired in controversy, endangering ecosystem function, biodiversity, public safety, and municipal watersheds. Our research program, motivated by the need to examine cumulative effects of many independent management decisions over large planning areas, focuses on the development of spatial data and modeling tools that enable diverse stakeholders to work together to guide landscape-scale planning efforts. Data layers describing forest composition and structure facilitate modeling of fire threat and wildlife habitat over areas of several hundred thousand hectares. Modeling alternative forest management scenarios via a collaborative, public process fosters informed discourse and helps conflicting parties forge appropriate policy and identify management responses that meet restoration objectives.",
keywords = "Arizona, Collaboration, Fire, Forest policy, Landscape assessment, Modeling, Planning, Public lands, Stakeholder",
author = "Sisk, {Thomas D} and Prather, {John W.} and Hampton, {Haydee M.} and Aumack, {Ethan N.} and Yaguang Xu and Dickson, {Brett G}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.10.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "300--310",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest

AU - Sisk, Thomas D

AU - Prather, John W.

AU - Hampton, Haydee M.

AU - Aumack, Ethan N.

AU - Xu, Yaguang

AU - Dickson, Brett G

PY - 2006/11/28

Y1 - 2006/11/28

N2 - Over the past 5 decades, stand-replacing crown fires have increased in size and frequency throughout the long-needled pine forests of the American Southwest. Suppression of frequent, low-intensity ground fires has resulted in dense stands of fire-prone trees over large areas. Efforts to restore forest structure to conditions that would permit a return to historical fire regimes, characterized by frequent ground fire, are hindered by the inability of managers and the public to compare the effects of alternative forest management practices on fire behavior and a host of other issues. Currently, forest management is mired in controversy, endangering ecosystem function, biodiversity, public safety, and municipal watersheds. Our research program, motivated by the need to examine cumulative effects of many independent management decisions over large planning areas, focuses on the development of spatial data and modeling tools that enable diverse stakeholders to work together to guide landscape-scale planning efforts. Data layers describing forest composition and structure facilitate modeling of fire threat and wildlife habitat over areas of several hundred thousand hectares. Modeling alternative forest management scenarios via a collaborative, public process fosters informed discourse and helps conflicting parties forge appropriate policy and identify management responses that meet restoration objectives.

AB - Over the past 5 decades, stand-replacing crown fires have increased in size and frequency throughout the long-needled pine forests of the American Southwest. Suppression of frequent, low-intensity ground fires has resulted in dense stands of fire-prone trees over large areas. Efforts to restore forest structure to conditions that would permit a return to historical fire regimes, characterized by frequent ground fire, are hindered by the inability of managers and the public to compare the effects of alternative forest management practices on fire behavior and a host of other issues. Currently, forest management is mired in controversy, endangering ecosystem function, biodiversity, public safety, and municipal watersheds. Our research program, motivated by the need to examine cumulative effects of many independent management decisions over large planning areas, focuses on the development of spatial data and modeling tools that enable diverse stakeholders to work together to guide landscape-scale planning efforts. Data layers describing forest composition and structure facilitate modeling of fire threat and wildlife habitat over areas of several hundred thousand hectares. Modeling alternative forest management scenarios via a collaborative, public process fosters informed discourse and helps conflicting parties forge appropriate policy and identify management responses that meet restoration objectives.

KW - Arizona

KW - Collaboration

KW - Fire

KW - Forest policy

KW - Landscape assessment

KW - Modeling

KW - Planning

KW - Public lands

KW - Stakeholder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750613736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750613736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 300

EP - 310

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

IS - 4

ER -