Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®

David K P McNeill, John R. Kline, Hendrik de Heer, Richard J Coast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lower body positive pressure (LBPP), or ‘anti-gravity’ treadmills® have become increasingly popular among elite distance runners. However, to date, few studies have assessed the effect of body weight support (BWS) on the metabolic cost of running among elite runners. This study evaluated how BWS influenced the relationship between velocity and metabolic cost among 6 elite male distance runners. Participants ran three- 16 minute tests consisting of 4 stages of 4 minutes at 8, 7, 6 and 5 min∙mile<sup>-1</sup> pace (3.35, 3.84, 4.47 and 5.36 m∙s<sup>-1</sup>), while maintaining an aerobic effort (Respiratory Exchange Ratio ≤1.00). One test was run on a regular treadmill, one on an anti-gravity treadmill with 40% BWS and one with 20% BWS being provided. Expired gas data were collected and regression equations used to determine and compare slopes. Significant decreases in oxygen uptake (V̇ O<inf>2</inf>) were found with each increase in BWS (p < 0.001). At 20% BWS, the average decrease in net VO2 was greater than proportional (34%), while at 40% BWS, the average net reduction in VO<inf>2</inf> was close to proportional (38%). Across velocities, the slope of the relationship between VO<inf>2</inf> and velocity (ΔV̇ O<inf>2</inf>/Δv) was steeper with less support. The slopes at both the 20% and 40% BWS conditions were similar, especially when compared to the regular treadmill. Variability in VO<inf>2</inf> between athletes was much greater on the LBPP treadmill and was greater with increased levels of BWS. In this study we evaluated the effect of body weight support on V̇ O<inf>2</inf> among elite distance runners. We have shown that oxygen uptake decreased with support, but not in direct proportion to that support. Further, because of the high variability in oxygen uptake between athletes on the LBPP treadmill, prediction equations may not be reliable and other indicators (heart rate, perceived exertion or directly measured oxygen uptake) should be used to guide training intensity when training on the LBPP treadmill.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-339
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Sports Science and Medicine
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Gravitation
Oxygen Consumption
Body Weight
Oxygen
Pressure
Athletes
Costs and Cost Analysis
Heart Rate
Gases

Keywords

  • AlterG®
  • Anti-gravity treadmill®
  • Distance running
  • Elite
  • LBPP treadmill
  • Oxygen consumption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®. / McNeill, David K P; Kline, John R.; de Heer, Hendrik; Coast, Richard J.

In: Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2015, p. 333-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{906a68558a7548a8bf2b34259c883073,
title = "Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill{\circledR}",
abstract = "Lower body positive pressure (LBPP), or ‘anti-gravity’ treadmills{\circledR} have become increasingly popular among elite distance runners. However, to date, few studies have assessed the effect of body weight support (BWS) on the metabolic cost of running among elite runners. This study evaluated how BWS influenced the relationship between velocity and metabolic cost among 6 elite male distance runners. Participants ran three- 16 minute tests consisting of 4 stages of 4 minutes at 8, 7, 6 and 5 min∙mile-1 pace (3.35, 3.84, 4.47 and 5.36 m∙s-1), while maintaining an aerobic effort (Respiratory Exchange Ratio ≤1.00). One test was run on a regular treadmill, one on an anti-gravity treadmill with 40{\%} BWS and one with 20{\%} BWS being provided. Expired gas data were collected and regression equations used to determine and compare slopes. Significant decreases in oxygen uptake (V̇ O2) were found with each increase in BWS (p < 0.001). At 20{\%} BWS, the average decrease in net VO2 was greater than proportional (34{\%}), while at 40{\%} BWS, the average net reduction in VO2 was close to proportional (38{\%}). Across velocities, the slope of the relationship between VO2 and velocity (ΔV̇ O2/Δv) was steeper with less support. The slopes at both the 20{\%} and 40{\%} BWS conditions were similar, especially when compared to the regular treadmill. Variability in VO2 between athletes was much greater on the LBPP treadmill and was greater with increased levels of BWS. In this study we evaluated the effect of body weight support on V̇ O2 among elite distance runners. We have shown that oxygen uptake decreased with support, but not in direct proportion to that support. Further, because of the high variability in oxygen uptake between athletes on the LBPP treadmill, prediction equations may not be reliable and other indicators (heart rate, perceived exertion or directly measured oxygen uptake) should be used to guide training intensity when training on the LBPP treadmill.",
keywords = "AlterG{\circledR}, Anti-gravity treadmill{\circledR}, Distance running, Elite, LBPP treadmill, Oxygen consumption",
author = "McNeill, {David K P} and Kline, {John R.} and {de Heer}, Hendrik and Coast, {Richard J}",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "333--339",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science and Medicine",
issn = "1303-2968",
publisher = "Department of Sports Medicine, Medical Faculty of Uludag University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®

AU - McNeill, David K P

AU - Kline, John R.

AU - de Heer, Hendrik

AU - Coast, Richard J

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Lower body positive pressure (LBPP), or ‘anti-gravity’ treadmills® have become increasingly popular among elite distance runners. However, to date, few studies have assessed the effect of body weight support (BWS) on the metabolic cost of running among elite runners. This study evaluated how BWS influenced the relationship between velocity and metabolic cost among 6 elite male distance runners. Participants ran three- 16 minute tests consisting of 4 stages of 4 minutes at 8, 7, 6 and 5 min∙mile-1 pace (3.35, 3.84, 4.47 and 5.36 m∙s-1), while maintaining an aerobic effort (Respiratory Exchange Ratio ≤1.00). One test was run on a regular treadmill, one on an anti-gravity treadmill with 40% BWS and one with 20% BWS being provided. Expired gas data were collected and regression equations used to determine and compare slopes. Significant decreases in oxygen uptake (V̇ O2) were found with each increase in BWS (p < 0.001). At 20% BWS, the average decrease in net VO2 was greater than proportional (34%), while at 40% BWS, the average net reduction in VO2 was close to proportional (38%). Across velocities, the slope of the relationship between VO2 and velocity (ΔV̇ O2/Δv) was steeper with less support. The slopes at both the 20% and 40% BWS conditions were similar, especially when compared to the regular treadmill. Variability in VO2 between athletes was much greater on the LBPP treadmill and was greater with increased levels of BWS. In this study we evaluated the effect of body weight support on V̇ O2 among elite distance runners. We have shown that oxygen uptake decreased with support, but not in direct proportion to that support. Further, because of the high variability in oxygen uptake between athletes on the LBPP treadmill, prediction equations may not be reliable and other indicators (heart rate, perceived exertion or directly measured oxygen uptake) should be used to guide training intensity when training on the LBPP treadmill.

AB - Lower body positive pressure (LBPP), or ‘anti-gravity’ treadmills® have become increasingly popular among elite distance runners. However, to date, few studies have assessed the effect of body weight support (BWS) on the metabolic cost of running among elite runners. This study evaluated how BWS influenced the relationship between velocity and metabolic cost among 6 elite male distance runners. Participants ran three- 16 minute tests consisting of 4 stages of 4 minutes at 8, 7, 6 and 5 min∙mile-1 pace (3.35, 3.84, 4.47 and 5.36 m∙s-1), while maintaining an aerobic effort (Respiratory Exchange Ratio ≤1.00). One test was run on a regular treadmill, one on an anti-gravity treadmill with 40% BWS and one with 20% BWS being provided. Expired gas data were collected and regression equations used to determine and compare slopes. Significant decreases in oxygen uptake (V̇ O2) were found with each increase in BWS (p < 0.001). At 20% BWS, the average decrease in net VO2 was greater than proportional (34%), while at 40% BWS, the average net reduction in VO2 was close to proportional (38%). Across velocities, the slope of the relationship between VO2 and velocity (ΔV̇ O2/Δv) was steeper with less support. The slopes at both the 20% and 40% BWS conditions were similar, especially when compared to the regular treadmill. Variability in VO2 between athletes was much greater on the LBPP treadmill and was greater with increased levels of BWS. In this study we evaluated the effect of body weight support on V̇ O2 among elite distance runners. We have shown that oxygen uptake decreased with support, but not in direct proportion to that support. Further, because of the high variability in oxygen uptake between athletes on the LBPP treadmill, prediction equations may not be reliable and other indicators (heart rate, perceived exertion or directly measured oxygen uptake) should be used to guide training intensity when training on the LBPP treadmill.

KW - AlterG®

KW - Anti-gravity treadmill®

KW - Distance running

KW - Elite

KW - LBPP treadmill

KW - Oxygen consumption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928989925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928989925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 333

EP - 339

JO - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

JF - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

SN - 1303-2968

IS - 2

ER -