Outcomes of fire research: Is science used?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An assessment of outcomes from research projects funded by the Joint Fire Science Program was conducted to determine whether or not science has been used to inform management and policy decisions and to explore factors that facilitate use of fire science. In a web survey and follow-up phone interviews, I asked boundary spanners and scientists about how findings from a random sample of 48 projects had been applied and factors that acted as barriers or facilitators to science application. In addition, I conducted an investigation of recent planning documents to determine whether products from the sampled projects were cited. All lines of evidence suggest that information from most (44 of 48) of these projects have been used by fire and fuels managers in some capacity. Science has mostly been used during planning efforts, to develop treatment prescriptions, and to evaluate current practices. Lack of manager awareness was commonly identified as a barrier to application of science. Conversely, activities and organisations that foster interaction between scientists and managers were identified as facilitating the application of science. The efforts of the Joint Fire Science Program to communicate science findings and engage managers has likely contributed to the application of fire science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-504
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Wildland Fire
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

managers
planning
research projects
interviews
science
sampling
project

Keywords

  • communication
  • planning
  • policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Ecology

Cite this

Outcomes of fire research : Is science used? / Hunter, Molly E.

In: International Journal of Wildland Fire, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2016, p. 495-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35eb86eadc4b4a0fa2a12da873509c16,
title = "Outcomes of fire research: Is science used?",
abstract = "An assessment of outcomes from research projects funded by the Joint Fire Science Program was conducted to determine whether or not science has been used to inform management and policy decisions and to explore factors that facilitate use of fire science. In a web survey and follow-up phone interviews, I asked boundary spanners and scientists about how findings from a random sample of 48 projects had been applied and factors that acted as barriers or facilitators to science application. In addition, I conducted an investigation of recent planning documents to determine whether products from the sampled projects were cited. All lines of evidence suggest that information from most (44 of 48) of these projects have been used by fire and fuels managers in some capacity. Science has mostly been used during planning efforts, to develop treatment prescriptions, and to evaluate current practices. Lack of manager awareness was commonly identified as a barrier to application of science. Conversely, activities and organisations that foster interaction between scientists and managers were identified as facilitating the application of science. The efforts of the Joint Fire Science Program to communicate science findings and engage managers has likely contributed to the application of fire science.",
keywords = "communication, planning, policy",
author = "Hunter, {Molly E}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1071/WF15202",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "495--504",
journal = "International Journal of Wildland Fire",
issn = "1049-8001",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of fire research

T2 - Is science used?

AU - Hunter, Molly E

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - An assessment of outcomes from research projects funded by the Joint Fire Science Program was conducted to determine whether or not science has been used to inform management and policy decisions and to explore factors that facilitate use of fire science. In a web survey and follow-up phone interviews, I asked boundary spanners and scientists about how findings from a random sample of 48 projects had been applied and factors that acted as barriers or facilitators to science application. In addition, I conducted an investigation of recent planning documents to determine whether products from the sampled projects were cited. All lines of evidence suggest that information from most (44 of 48) of these projects have been used by fire and fuels managers in some capacity. Science has mostly been used during planning efforts, to develop treatment prescriptions, and to evaluate current practices. Lack of manager awareness was commonly identified as a barrier to application of science. Conversely, activities and organisations that foster interaction between scientists and managers were identified as facilitating the application of science. The efforts of the Joint Fire Science Program to communicate science findings and engage managers has likely contributed to the application of fire science.

AB - An assessment of outcomes from research projects funded by the Joint Fire Science Program was conducted to determine whether or not science has been used to inform management and policy decisions and to explore factors that facilitate use of fire science. In a web survey and follow-up phone interviews, I asked boundary spanners and scientists about how findings from a random sample of 48 projects had been applied and factors that acted as barriers or facilitators to science application. In addition, I conducted an investigation of recent planning documents to determine whether products from the sampled projects were cited. All lines of evidence suggest that information from most (44 of 48) of these projects have been used by fire and fuels managers in some capacity. Science has mostly been used during planning efforts, to develop treatment prescriptions, and to evaluate current practices. Lack of manager awareness was commonly identified as a barrier to application of science. Conversely, activities and organisations that foster interaction between scientists and managers were identified as facilitating the application of science. The efforts of the Joint Fire Science Program to communicate science findings and engage managers has likely contributed to the application of fire science.

KW - communication

KW - planning

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968830632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968830632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/WF15202

DO - 10.1071/WF15202

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84968830632

VL - 25

SP - 495

EP - 504

JO - International Journal of Wildland Fire

JF - International Journal of Wildland Fire

SN - 1049-8001

IS - 5

ER -