Operational performance comparison of video detection systems

Avery Rhodes, Edward J Smaglik, Darcy M. Bullock, Jim Sturdevant

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Video detection has become increasingly popular for presence detection atsignalized intersections because of its versatility and ease of installation. However,several reports have documented performance problems in specific systems. Thispaper quantifies the performance of three different commercially available videodetection systems. The systems were tested in May and September 2005 for presencedetection accuracy.Prior to the May 2005 test, a representative from each vendor configured thevideo detection zones to match the loop detection zones as closely as possible. Theoutputs from the loop detection for the through-right and left-turn lane groups werecompared with the corresponding output from each of the video detection systems.Whenever there was a discrepancy between the loop and video, a digital video wasobserved to determine the cause of the discrepancy.Missed calls and false calls were categorized for each system. The errors werealso categorized according to the impact that they would have on signal operations.During a 24hr test on two separate days, the number of missed detections longer than 5seconds ranged from 9 to 147, and the number of false calls longer than 5 secondsranged from 14 to 159. The loop detectors had one false call longer than 5 seconds andone missed call longer than five seconds during both tests.Although technology has advanced in the two years since this test wascompleted, the results documented in this paper apply to a large number of installationsthat have not been upgraded since the Fall of 2005. Furthermore, this paper highlightsthe importance of developing rigorous detection performance specifications so agenciescan make informed decision about the relative advantages and disadvantages ofalternative detection technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInstitute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007
Pages549-588
Number of pages40
Volume1
StatePublished - 2007
EventInstitute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007 - Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Duration: Aug 5 2007Aug 8 2007

Other

OtherInstitute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007
CountryUnited States
CityPittsburgh, PA
Period8/5/078/8/07

Fingerprint

performance comparison
video
Detectors
Specifications
performance
cause
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Rhodes, A., Smaglik, E. J., Bullock, D. M., & Sturdevant, J. (2007). Operational performance comparison of video detection systems. In Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007 (Vol. 1, pp. 549-588)

Operational performance comparison of video detection systems. / Rhodes, Avery; Smaglik, Edward J; Bullock, Darcy M.; Sturdevant, Jim.

Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007. Vol. 1 2007. p. 549-588.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rhodes, A, Smaglik, EJ, Bullock, DM & Sturdevant, J 2007, Operational performance comparison of video detection systems. in Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007. vol. 1, pp. 549-588, Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 8/5/07.
Rhodes A, Smaglik EJ, Bullock DM, Sturdevant J. Operational performance comparison of video detection systems. In Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007. Vol. 1. 2007. p. 549-588
Rhodes, Avery ; Smaglik, Edward J ; Bullock, Darcy M. ; Sturdevant, Jim. / Operational performance comparison of video detection systems. Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007. Vol. 1 2007. pp. 549-588
@inproceedings{464a0a8db6d24bc6bba6eb9bd7772181,
title = "Operational performance comparison of video detection systems",
abstract = "Video detection has become increasingly popular for presence detection atsignalized intersections because of its versatility and ease of installation. However,several reports have documented performance problems in specific systems. Thispaper quantifies the performance of three different commercially available videodetection systems. The systems were tested in May and September 2005 for presencedetection accuracy.Prior to the May 2005 test, a representative from each vendor configured thevideo detection zones to match the loop detection zones as closely as possible. Theoutputs from the loop detection for the through-right and left-turn lane groups werecompared with the corresponding output from each of the video detection systems.Whenever there was a discrepancy between the loop and video, a digital video wasobserved to determine the cause of the discrepancy.Missed calls and false calls were categorized for each system. The errors werealso categorized according to the impact that they would have on signal operations.During a 24hr test on two separate days, the number of missed detections longer than 5seconds ranged from 9 to 147, and the number of false calls longer than 5 secondsranged from 14 to 159. The loop detectors had one false call longer than 5 seconds andone missed call longer than five seconds during both tests.Although technology has advanced in the two years since this test wascompleted, the results documented in this paper apply to a large number of installationsthat have not been upgraded since the Fall of 2005. Furthermore, this paper highlightsthe importance of developing rigorous detection performance specifications so agenciescan make informed decision about the relative advantages and disadvantages ofalternative detection technology.",
author = "Avery Rhodes and Smaglik, {Edward J} and Bullock, {Darcy M.} and Jim Sturdevant",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781622761876",
volume = "1",
pages = "549--588",
booktitle = "Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Operational performance comparison of video detection systems

AU - Rhodes, Avery

AU - Smaglik, Edward J

AU - Bullock, Darcy M.

AU - Sturdevant, Jim

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Video detection has become increasingly popular for presence detection atsignalized intersections because of its versatility and ease of installation. However,several reports have documented performance problems in specific systems. Thispaper quantifies the performance of three different commercially available videodetection systems. The systems were tested in May and September 2005 for presencedetection accuracy.Prior to the May 2005 test, a representative from each vendor configured thevideo detection zones to match the loop detection zones as closely as possible. Theoutputs from the loop detection for the through-right and left-turn lane groups werecompared with the corresponding output from each of the video detection systems.Whenever there was a discrepancy between the loop and video, a digital video wasobserved to determine the cause of the discrepancy.Missed calls and false calls were categorized for each system. The errors werealso categorized according to the impact that they would have on signal operations.During a 24hr test on two separate days, the number of missed detections longer than 5seconds ranged from 9 to 147, and the number of false calls longer than 5 secondsranged from 14 to 159. The loop detectors had one false call longer than 5 seconds andone missed call longer than five seconds during both tests.Although technology has advanced in the two years since this test wascompleted, the results documented in this paper apply to a large number of installationsthat have not been upgraded since the Fall of 2005. Furthermore, this paper highlightsthe importance of developing rigorous detection performance specifications so agenciescan make informed decision about the relative advantages and disadvantages ofalternative detection technology.

AB - Video detection has become increasingly popular for presence detection atsignalized intersections because of its versatility and ease of installation. However,several reports have documented performance problems in specific systems. Thispaper quantifies the performance of three different commercially available videodetection systems. The systems were tested in May and September 2005 for presencedetection accuracy.Prior to the May 2005 test, a representative from each vendor configured thevideo detection zones to match the loop detection zones as closely as possible. Theoutputs from the loop detection for the through-right and left-turn lane groups werecompared with the corresponding output from each of the video detection systems.Whenever there was a discrepancy between the loop and video, a digital video wasobserved to determine the cause of the discrepancy.Missed calls and false calls were categorized for each system. The errors werealso categorized according to the impact that they would have on signal operations.During a 24hr test on two separate days, the number of missed detections longer than 5seconds ranged from 9 to 147, and the number of false calls longer than 5 secondsranged from 14 to 159. The loop detectors had one false call longer than 5 seconds andone missed call longer than five seconds during both tests.Although technology has advanced in the two years since this test wascompleted, the results documented in this paper apply to a large number of installationsthat have not been upgraded since the Fall of 2005. Furthermore, this paper highlightsthe importance of developing rigorous detection performance specifications so agenciescan make informed decision about the relative advantages and disadvantages ofalternative detection technology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873513102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873513102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781622761876

VL - 1

SP - 549

EP - 588

BT - Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting and Exhibit 2007

ER -