On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation: A reply to Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper addresses several issues relating to the research goals and methodological techniques used in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation (e.g., Biber, 1988). The paper is prompted by the allegations of inadequacy and error published in Watson (1994). In my discussion, I point out that Watson fails to substantiate his claimed inadequacies with empirical evidence, and that previous investigations have shown that many of these criticisms are factually incorrect. In addition, I attempt to correct several fundamental misunderstandings of the multi-dimensional approach and the relationships among computational, statistical, and interpretive methodologies within the approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-370
Number of pages30
JournalText
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

criticism
methodology
evidence
Register Variation
Computational
Empirical Evidence
Misunderstanding
Criticism
Methodology
Fundamental

Keywords

  • computer taggers
  • corpus linguistics
  • multi-dimensional analysis
  • multivariate statistics
  • register variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{d3cabe2bc44f4924965f561561835979,
title = "On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation: A reply to Watson",
abstract = "The present paper addresses several issues relating to the research goals and methodological techniques used in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation (e.g., Biber, 1988). The paper is prompted by the allegations of inadequacy and error published in Watson (1994). In my discussion, I point out that Watson fails to substantiate his claimed inadequacies with empirical evidence, and that previous investigations have shown that many of these criticisms are factually incorrect. In addition, I attempt to correct several fundamental misunderstandings of the multi-dimensional approach and the relationships among computational, statistical, and interpretive methodologies within the approach.",
keywords = "computer taggers, corpus linguistics, multi-dimensional analysis, multivariate statistics, register variation",
author = "Biber, {Douglas E}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.341",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "341--370",
journal = "Text and Talk",
issn = "1860-7330",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation

T2 - A reply to Watson

AU - Biber, Douglas E

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The present paper addresses several issues relating to the research goals and methodological techniques used in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation (e.g., Biber, 1988). The paper is prompted by the allegations of inadequacy and error published in Watson (1994). In my discussion, I point out that Watson fails to substantiate his claimed inadequacies with empirical evidence, and that previous investigations have shown that many of these criticisms are factually incorrect. In addition, I attempt to correct several fundamental misunderstandings of the multi-dimensional approach and the relationships among computational, statistical, and interpretive methodologies within the approach.

AB - The present paper addresses several issues relating to the research goals and methodological techniques used in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation (e.g., Biber, 1988). The paper is prompted by the allegations of inadequacy and error published in Watson (1994). In my discussion, I point out that Watson fails to substantiate his claimed inadequacies with empirical evidence, and that previous investigations have shown that many of these criticisms are factually incorrect. In addition, I attempt to correct several fundamental misunderstandings of the multi-dimensional approach and the relationships among computational, statistical, and interpretive methodologies within the approach.

KW - computer taggers

KW - corpus linguistics

KW - multi-dimensional analysis

KW - multivariate statistics

KW - register variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945050086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945050086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.341

DO - 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.341

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945050086

VL - 15

SP - 341

EP - 370

JO - Text and Talk

JF - Text and Talk

SN - 1860-7330

IS - 3

ER -