On the locus of age differences in visual information processing

Robert E Till, L. D. Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Age differences in visual information processing were investigated in a study of monoptic backward masking. Young (18 to 22) and old (58 to 73) adults were tested in three experiments utilizing both a random visual noise and a pattern (fragments) mask, with two-letter combinations serving as target stimuli. Critical target duration needed to escape masking was measured at several mask durations in Exps. 1 and 2; critical interstimulus interval was assessed at several target durations in Exp. 3. With random noise as the mask, a small but reliable age difference was seen across the range of mask or target durations, supporting previous reports of age differences in peripheral processing. With the pattern mask as the masking stimulus, there was mixed evidence for age differences in central processing. Such age effects were clearest in Exp. 3 in which the role of luminance summation had been reduced. Control procedures in Exps. 1 and 2 tended to eliminate evidence for central masking. Results are discussed in terms of the magnitude of age differences in peripheral and central processing and in terms of procedural artifacts of previous research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-210
Number of pages11
JournalJournals of Gerontology
Volume36
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Masks
Automatic Data Processing
Artifacts
Noise
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

On the locus of age differences in visual information processing. / Till, Robert E; Franklin, L. D.

In: Journals of Gerontology, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1981, p. 200-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{936f23375a95488eb6915956b2c74a85,
title = "On the locus of age differences in visual information processing",
abstract = "Age differences in visual information processing were investigated in a study of monoptic backward masking. Young (18 to 22) and old (58 to 73) adults were tested in three experiments utilizing both a random visual noise and a pattern (fragments) mask, with two-letter combinations serving as target stimuli. Critical target duration needed to escape masking was measured at several mask durations in Exps. 1 and 2; critical interstimulus interval was assessed at several target durations in Exp. 3. With random noise as the mask, a small but reliable age difference was seen across the range of mask or target durations, supporting previous reports of age differences in peripheral processing. With the pattern mask as the masking stimulus, there was mixed evidence for age differences in central processing. Such age effects were clearest in Exp. 3 in which the role of luminance summation had been reduced. Control procedures in Exps. 1 and 2 tended to eliminate evidence for central masking. Results are discussed in terms of the magnitude of age differences in peripheral and central processing and in terms of procedural artifacts of previous research.",
author = "Till, {Robert E} and Franklin, {L. D.}",
year = "1981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "200--210",
journal = "Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences",
issn = "0022-1422",
publisher = "Gerontological Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the locus of age differences in visual information processing

AU - Till, Robert E

AU - Franklin, L. D.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - Age differences in visual information processing were investigated in a study of monoptic backward masking. Young (18 to 22) and old (58 to 73) adults were tested in three experiments utilizing both a random visual noise and a pattern (fragments) mask, with two-letter combinations serving as target stimuli. Critical target duration needed to escape masking was measured at several mask durations in Exps. 1 and 2; critical interstimulus interval was assessed at several target durations in Exp. 3. With random noise as the mask, a small but reliable age difference was seen across the range of mask or target durations, supporting previous reports of age differences in peripheral processing. With the pattern mask as the masking stimulus, there was mixed evidence for age differences in central processing. Such age effects were clearest in Exp. 3 in which the role of luminance summation had been reduced. Control procedures in Exps. 1 and 2 tended to eliminate evidence for central masking. Results are discussed in terms of the magnitude of age differences in peripheral and central processing and in terms of procedural artifacts of previous research.

AB - Age differences in visual information processing were investigated in a study of monoptic backward masking. Young (18 to 22) and old (58 to 73) adults were tested in three experiments utilizing both a random visual noise and a pattern (fragments) mask, with two-letter combinations serving as target stimuli. Critical target duration needed to escape masking was measured at several mask durations in Exps. 1 and 2; critical interstimulus interval was assessed at several target durations in Exp. 3. With random noise as the mask, a small but reliable age difference was seen across the range of mask or target durations, supporting previous reports of age differences in peripheral processing. With the pattern mask as the masking stimulus, there was mixed evidence for age differences in central processing. Such age effects were clearest in Exp. 3 in which the role of luminance summation had been reduced. Control procedures in Exps. 1 and 2 tended to eliminate evidence for central masking. Results are discussed in terms of the magnitude of age differences in peripheral and central processing and in terms of procedural artifacts of previous research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019427622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019427622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 200

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences

JF - Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences

SN - 0022-1422

IS - 2

ER -