Nonnative species influence vegetative response to ecological restoration

Two forests with divergent restoration outcomes

Christopher M. McGlone, Michael T. Stoddard, Judith D. Springer, Mark L. Daniels, Peter Z Fule, Wallace W Covington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Changes in the vegetative structure and diversity of ponderosa pine forests have generated interest in conducting ecological restoration projects to improve the overall forest health of these ecosystems. Ecological restoration prescriptions often consist of thinning trees to emulate pre-1870s forest structure followed by prescribed burning. Disturbances associated with ecological restoration can, however, promote invasion by nonnative species. We compared two northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests treated for ecological restoration, one at the Fort Valley Experimental Forest and one at Mt. Trumbull on the Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument. We examined the response of native and nonnative plant species, as well as all species combined, to treatments at the two forests. Both study sites showed a significant increase in native and nonnative species cover and richness by the fifth year post-treatment that remained significant by the tenth year post-treatment. Despite these general trends in native and nonnative community development, the understory vegetation at the two sites followed diverging successional patterns after treatment. By the tenth year post-treatment Fort Valley was dominated by native species and Mt. Trumbull was dominated by a single nonnative species, cheatgrass. The differences in post-treatment understory recovery are likely due to pretreatment forest conditions. At Fort Valley, nonnatives were present, but accounted for only 0.11% of the pretreatment cover. At Mt. Trumbull, nonnatives accounted for 5.26% of the pretreatment understory cover, with cheatgrass accounting for approximately 4% of the understory cover. Additionally, the soil seedbank at Fort Valley had greater overall species richness and greater native perennial grass richness than Mt. Trumbull. We propose that the application of ecological restoration treatments should be targeted to sites with low abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment. Sites containing high abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment should be managed for nonnative species mitigation before initiating any ecological restoration projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-203
Number of pages9
JournalForest Ecology and Management
Volume285
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

ecological restoration
understory
valleys
valley
Bromus tectorum
pretreatment
Pinus ponderosa
coniferous forests
indigenous species
forest health
experimental forests
prescribed burning
community development
pollution control
canyons
monument
buried seeds
thinning (plants)
native species
canyon

Keywords

  • Arizona
  • Cheatgrass
  • Forest
  • Nonnative
  • Ponderosa pine
  • Prescribed fire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Nonnative species influence vegetative response to ecological restoration : Two forests with divergent restoration outcomes. / McGlone, Christopher M.; Stoddard, Michael T.; Springer, Judith D.; Daniels, Mark L.; Fule, Peter Z; Covington, Wallace W.

In: Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 285, 01.12.2012, p. 195-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGlone, Christopher M. ; Stoddard, Michael T. ; Springer, Judith D. ; Daniels, Mark L. ; Fule, Peter Z ; Covington, Wallace W. / Nonnative species influence vegetative response to ecological restoration : Two forests with divergent restoration outcomes. In: Forest Ecology and Management. 2012 ; Vol. 285. pp. 195-203.
@article{361a61b51eda4a1081d387ba490a86fe,
title = "Nonnative species influence vegetative response to ecological restoration: Two forests with divergent restoration outcomes",
abstract = "Changes in the vegetative structure and diversity of ponderosa pine forests have generated interest in conducting ecological restoration projects to improve the overall forest health of these ecosystems. Ecological restoration prescriptions often consist of thinning trees to emulate pre-1870s forest structure followed by prescribed burning. Disturbances associated with ecological restoration can, however, promote invasion by nonnative species. We compared two northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests treated for ecological restoration, one at the Fort Valley Experimental Forest and one at Mt. Trumbull on the Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument. We examined the response of native and nonnative plant species, as well as all species combined, to treatments at the two forests. Both study sites showed a significant increase in native and nonnative species cover and richness by the fifth year post-treatment that remained significant by the tenth year post-treatment. Despite these general trends in native and nonnative community development, the understory vegetation at the two sites followed diverging successional patterns after treatment. By the tenth year post-treatment Fort Valley was dominated by native species and Mt. Trumbull was dominated by a single nonnative species, cheatgrass. The differences in post-treatment understory recovery are likely due to pretreatment forest conditions. At Fort Valley, nonnatives were present, but accounted for only 0.11{\%} of the pretreatment cover. At Mt. Trumbull, nonnatives accounted for 5.26{\%} of the pretreatment understory cover, with cheatgrass accounting for approximately 4{\%} of the understory cover. Additionally, the soil seedbank at Fort Valley had greater overall species richness and greater native perennial grass richness than Mt. Trumbull. We propose that the application of ecological restoration treatments should be targeted to sites with low abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment. Sites containing high abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment should be managed for nonnative species mitigation before initiating any ecological restoration projects.",
keywords = "Arizona, Cheatgrass, Forest, Nonnative, Ponderosa pine, Prescribed fire",
author = "McGlone, {Christopher M.} and Stoddard, {Michael T.} and Springer, {Judith D.} and Daniels, {Mark L.} and Fule, {Peter Z} and Covington, {Wallace W}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "285",
pages = "195--203",
journal = "Forest Ecology and Management",
issn = "0378-1127",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonnative species influence vegetative response to ecological restoration

T2 - Two forests with divergent restoration outcomes

AU - McGlone, Christopher M.

AU - Stoddard, Michael T.

AU - Springer, Judith D.

AU - Daniels, Mark L.

AU - Fule, Peter Z

AU - Covington, Wallace W

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Changes in the vegetative structure and diversity of ponderosa pine forests have generated interest in conducting ecological restoration projects to improve the overall forest health of these ecosystems. Ecological restoration prescriptions often consist of thinning trees to emulate pre-1870s forest structure followed by prescribed burning. Disturbances associated with ecological restoration can, however, promote invasion by nonnative species. We compared two northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests treated for ecological restoration, one at the Fort Valley Experimental Forest and one at Mt. Trumbull on the Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument. We examined the response of native and nonnative plant species, as well as all species combined, to treatments at the two forests. Both study sites showed a significant increase in native and nonnative species cover and richness by the fifth year post-treatment that remained significant by the tenth year post-treatment. Despite these general trends in native and nonnative community development, the understory vegetation at the two sites followed diverging successional patterns after treatment. By the tenth year post-treatment Fort Valley was dominated by native species and Mt. Trumbull was dominated by a single nonnative species, cheatgrass. The differences in post-treatment understory recovery are likely due to pretreatment forest conditions. At Fort Valley, nonnatives were present, but accounted for only 0.11% of the pretreatment cover. At Mt. Trumbull, nonnatives accounted for 5.26% of the pretreatment understory cover, with cheatgrass accounting for approximately 4% of the understory cover. Additionally, the soil seedbank at Fort Valley had greater overall species richness and greater native perennial grass richness than Mt. Trumbull. We propose that the application of ecological restoration treatments should be targeted to sites with low abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment. Sites containing high abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment should be managed for nonnative species mitigation before initiating any ecological restoration projects.

AB - Changes in the vegetative structure and diversity of ponderosa pine forests have generated interest in conducting ecological restoration projects to improve the overall forest health of these ecosystems. Ecological restoration prescriptions often consist of thinning trees to emulate pre-1870s forest structure followed by prescribed burning. Disturbances associated with ecological restoration can, however, promote invasion by nonnative species. We compared two northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests treated for ecological restoration, one at the Fort Valley Experimental Forest and one at Mt. Trumbull on the Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument. We examined the response of native and nonnative plant species, as well as all species combined, to treatments at the two forests. Both study sites showed a significant increase in native and nonnative species cover and richness by the fifth year post-treatment that remained significant by the tenth year post-treatment. Despite these general trends in native and nonnative community development, the understory vegetation at the two sites followed diverging successional patterns after treatment. By the tenth year post-treatment Fort Valley was dominated by native species and Mt. Trumbull was dominated by a single nonnative species, cheatgrass. The differences in post-treatment understory recovery are likely due to pretreatment forest conditions. At Fort Valley, nonnatives were present, but accounted for only 0.11% of the pretreatment cover. At Mt. Trumbull, nonnatives accounted for 5.26% of the pretreatment understory cover, with cheatgrass accounting for approximately 4% of the understory cover. Additionally, the soil seedbank at Fort Valley had greater overall species richness and greater native perennial grass richness than Mt. Trumbull. We propose that the application of ecological restoration treatments should be targeted to sites with low abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment. Sites containing high abundance of nonnatives prior to treatment should be managed for nonnative species mitigation before initiating any ecological restoration projects.

KW - Arizona

KW - Cheatgrass

KW - Forest

KW - Nonnative

KW - Ponderosa pine

KW - Prescribed fire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866169843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866169843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.022

DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.022

M3 - Article

VL - 285

SP - 195

EP - 203

JO - Forest Ecology and Management

JF - Forest Ecology and Management

SN - 0378-1127

ER -