New evidence pertaining to the prediction of operating cash flows

Kenneth S Lorek, G. Lee Willinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate the ability of past operating cash flows (Model 1) and past earnings (Model 2) to generate predictions of operating cash flows from 1990 to 2004. We employ actual cash flow numbers reported in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 95 in our primary analysis rather than using an algorithm to approximate operating cash flows (i.e., Kim and Kross J Acc Res 43:753-780, 2005; Dechow et al. J Acc Econ 25:133-168, 1998, among others). We derive out of sample predictions of operating cash flows both cross-sectionally similar to the approach of Kim and Kross (2005) and on a firm-specific time-series basis consistent with Dechow et al. (1998). Our predictive findings suggest: (1) cash-flow based models (Model 1) provide significantly more accurate predictions of operating cash flows than earnings-based models (Model 2); (2) time-series models significantly outperform cross-sectional models; (3) larger firms exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than smaller firms; (4) firms with relatively shorter operating cycles exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions that firms with longer operating cycles consistent with Dechow (J Acc Econ 18:3-42, 1994); (5) we find no evidence of increased predictive power for either the cash-based or earnings-based prediction models across 1990-2004; (6) we also provide supplementary analyses to assess the impact on predictive performance when descriptive goodness-of-fit criteria are used instead of out-of-sample forecasts to assess predictive performance, and (7) we re-estimate the CFO prediction models using algorithmic CFO data instead of actual data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Operating cash flows
Prediction
Cash flow prediction
Out-of-sample forecasting
Prediction model
Cash flow
Small firms
Time series models
Large firms
Financial accounting standards
Goodness of fit
Cash
Predictive power

Keywords

  • Cross-sectional prediction models
  • Operating cash flows
  • Operating cycles
  • Prediction models
  • Predictive ability
  • Time-series

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Accounting
  • Finance

Cite this

New evidence pertaining to the prediction of operating cash flows. / Lorek, Kenneth S; Willinger, G. Lee.

In: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4faeadaa246453fa8c0358a22fc0dc8,
title = "New evidence pertaining to the prediction of operating cash flows",
abstract = "We investigate the ability of past operating cash flows (Model 1) and past earnings (Model 2) to generate predictions of operating cash flows from 1990 to 2004. We employ actual cash flow numbers reported in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 95 in our primary analysis rather than using an algorithm to approximate operating cash flows (i.e., Kim and Kross J Acc Res 43:753-780, 2005; Dechow et al. J Acc Econ 25:133-168, 1998, among others). We derive out of sample predictions of operating cash flows both cross-sectionally similar to the approach of Kim and Kross (2005) and on a firm-specific time-series basis consistent with Dechow et al. (1998). Our predictive findings suggest: (1) cash-flow based models (Model 1) provide significantly more accurate predictions of operating cash flows than earnings-based models (Model 2); (2) time-series models significantly outperform cross-sectional models; (3) larger firms exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than smaller firms; (4) firms with relatively shorter operating cycles exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions that firms with longer operating cycles consistent with Dechow (J Acc Econ 18:3-42, 1994); (5) we find no evidence of increased predictive power for either the cash-based or earnings-based prediction models across 1990-2004; (6) we also provide supplementary analyses to assess the impact on predictive performance when descriptive goodness-of-fit criteria are used instead of out-of-sample forecasts to assess predictive performance, and (7) we re-estimate the CFO prediction models using algorithmic CFO data instead of actual data.",
keywords = "Cross-sectional prediction models, Operating cash flows, Operating cycles, Prediction models, Predictive ability, Time-series",
author = "Lorek, {Kenneth S} and Willinger, {G. Lee}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11156-007-0076-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting",
issn = "0924-865X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New evidence pertaining to the prediction of operating cash flows

AU - Lorek, Kenneth S

AU - Willinger, G. Lee

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - We investigate the ability of past operating cash flows (Model 1) and past earnings (Model 2) to generate predictions of operating cash flows from 1990 to 2004. We employ actual cash flow numbers reported in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 95 in our primary analysis rather than using an algorithm to approximate operating cash flows (i.e., Kim and Kross J Acc Res 43:753-780, 2005; Dechow et al. J Acc Econ 25:133-168, 1998, among others). We derive out of sample predictions of operating cash flows both cross-sectionally similar to the approach of Kim and Kross (2005) and on a firm-specific time-series basis consistent with Dechow et al. (1998). Our predictive findings suggest: (1) cash-flow based models (Model 1) provide significantly more accurate predictions of operating cash flows than earnings-based models (Model 2); (2) time-series models significantly outperform cross-sectional models; (3) larger firms exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than smaller firms; (4) firms with relatively shorter operating cycles exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions that firms with longer operating cycles consistent with Dechow (J Acc Econ 18:3-42, 1994); (5) we find no evidence of increased predictive power for either the cash-based or earnings-based prediction models across 1990-2004; (6) we also provide supplementary analyses to assess the impact on predictive performance when descriptive goodness-of-fit criteria are used instead of out-of-sample forecasts to assess predictive performance, and (7) we re-estimate the CFO prediction models using algorithmic CFO data instead of actual data.

AB - We investigate the ability of past operating cash flows (Model 1) and past earnings (Model 2) to generate predictions of operating cash flows from 1990 to 2004. We employ actual cash flow numbers reported in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 95 in our primary analysis rather than using an algorithm to approximate operating cash flows (i.e., Kim and Kross J Acc Res 43:753-780, 2005; Dechow et al. J Acc Econ 25:133-168, 1998, among others). We derive out of sample predictions of operating cash flows both cross-sectionally similar to the approach of Kim and Kross (2005) and on a firm-specific time-series basis consistent with Dechow et al. (1998). Our predictive findings suggest: (1) cash-flow based models (Model 1) provide significantly more accurate predictions of operating cash flows than earnings-based models (Model 2); (2) time-series models significantly outperform cross-sectional models; (3) larger firms exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions than smaller firms; (4) firms with relatively shorter operating cycles exhibit significantly more accurate cash-flow predictions that firms with longer operating cycles consistent with Dechow (J Acc Econ 18:3-42, 1994); (5) we find no evidence of increased predictive power for either the cash-based or earnings-based prediction models across 1990-2004; (6) we also provide supplementary analyses to assess the impact on predictive performance when descriptive goodness-of-fit criteria are used instead of out-of-sample forecasts to assess predictive performance, and (7) we re-estimate the CFO prediction models using algorithmic CFO data instead of actual data.

KW - Cross-sectional prediction models

KW - Operating cash flows

KW - Operating cycles

KW - Prediction models

KW - Predictive ability

KW - Time-series

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58649089790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58649089790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11156-007-0076-1

DO - 10.1007/s11156-007-0076-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58649089790

VL - 32

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

JF - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

SN - 0924-865X

IS - 1

ER -