Multiple constraints on the age of a Pleistocene lava dam across the Little Colorado River at Grand Falls, Arizona

Wendell Duffield, Nancy Riggs, Darrell Kaufman, Duane Champion, Cassandra Fenton, Steven Forman, William McIntosh, Richard Hereford, Jeffery Plescia, Michael Ort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Grand Falls basalt lava flow in northern Arizona was emplaced in late Pleistocene time. It flowed 10 km from its vent area to the Little Colorado River, where it cascaded into and filled a 65-m-deep canyon to form the Grand Falls lava dam. Lava continued ∼25 km downstream and ∼1 km onto the far rim beyond where the canyon was filled. Subsequent fluvial sedimentation filled the reservoir behind the dam, and eventually the river established a channel along the margin of the lava flow to the site where water falls back into the pre-eruption canyon. The ca. 150 ka age of the Grand Falls flow provided by whole-rock K-Ar analysis in the 1970s is inconsistent with the preservation of centimeter-scale flow-top features on the surface of the flow and the near absence of physical and chemical weathering on the flow downstream of the falls. The buried Little Colorado River channel and the present-day channel are at nearly the same elevation, indicating that very little, if any, regional downcutting has occurred since emplacement of the flow. Newly applied dating techniques better define the age of the lava dam. Infrared-stimulated luminescence dating of silty mudstone baked by the lava yielded an age of 19.6 ± 1.2 ka. Samples from three noneroded or slightly eroded outcrops at the top of the lava flow yielded 3He cosmogenic ages of 16 ± 1 ka, 17 ± 1 ka, and 20 ± 1 ka. A mean age of 8 ± 19 ka was obtained from averaging four samples using the 40Ar/39Ar step-heating method. Finally, paleomagnetic directions in lava samples from two sites at Grand Falls and one at the vent area are nearly identical and match the curve of magnetic secular variation at ca. 15 ka, 19 ka, 23 ka, and 28 ka. We conclude that the Grand Falls flow was emplaced at ca. 20 ka.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-429
Number of pages9
JournalBulletin of the Geological Society of America
Volume118
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Keywords

  • Ar/Ar
  • Grand Falls lava dam
  • He
  • Infrared luminescence
  • Magnetic secular variation
  • Quaternary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple constraints on the age of a Pleistocene lava dam across the Little Colorado River at Grand Falls, Arizona'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this