Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives

Aregai Tecle, Martin Fogel, Lucien Duckstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques are used to analyze a multiobjective wastewater management problem in order to select an appropriate management scheme. A specific case study consisting of 15 alternative management schemes is evaluated with respect to 12 noncommensurable, discrete criteria, using three different MCDM techniques; compromise programming (CP), cooperative game theory (CGT), and ELECTRE I. The case study is the Nogales International Wastewater Management Project, which treats wastewater coming from the twin cities of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico. The problem is formulated in a multicriterion context in terms of objectives, specifications, criteria, criterion scales, and construction of an evaluation matrix that consists of the alternative versus criteria array. Analyses of the matrix using the MCDM techniques result in selecting the most satisfying alternative in the case of CP and CGT and narrowing the choice to a few non-dominated alternatives (here, two) in the case of ELECTRE I.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-398
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume114
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Waste Water
Game Theory
Decision Making
game theory
Wastewater
Decision making
Game theory
decision making
wastewater
management
compromise
matrix
programming
project management
Mexico
Project management
Specifications
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Engineering(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives. / Tecle, Aregai; Fogel, Martin; Duckstein, Lucien.

In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 114, No. 4, 1988, p. 383-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tecle, Aregai ; Fogel, Martin ; Duckstein, Lucien. / Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives. In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 1988 ; Vol. 114, No. 4. pp. 383-398.
@article{7d140dde53e249d79350763aa0e009d0,
title = "Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives",
abstract = "Multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques are used to analyze a multiobjective wastewater management problem in order to select an appropriate management scheme. A specific case study consisting of 15 alternative management schemes is evaluated with respect to 12 noncommensurable, discrete criteria, using three different MCDM techniques; compromise programming (CP), cooperative game theory (CGT), and ELECTRE I. The case study is the Nogales International Wastewater Management Project, which treats wastewater coming from the twin cities of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico. The problem is formulated in a multicriterion context in terms of objectives, specifications, criteria, criterion scales, and construction of an evaluation matrix that consists of the alternative versus criteria array. Analyses of the matrix using the MCDM techniques result in selecting the most satisfying alternative in the case of CP and CGT and narrowing the choice to a few non-dominated alternatives (here, two) in the case of ELECTRE I.",
author = "Aregai Tecle and Martin Fogel and Lucien Duckstein",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:4(383)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "383--398",
journal = "Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9496",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives

AU - Tecle, Aregai

AU - Fogel, Martin

AU - Duckstein, Lucien

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques are used to analyze a multiobjective wastewater management problem in order to select an appropriate management scheme. A specific case study consisting of 15 alternative management schemes is evaluated with respect to 12 noncommensurable, discrete criteria, using three different MCDM techniques; compromise programming (CP), cooperative game theory (CGT), and ELECTRE I. The case study is the Nogales International Wastewater Management Project, which treats wastewater coming from the twin cities of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico. The problem is formulated in a multicriterion context in terms of objectives, specifications, criteria, criterion scales, and construction of an evaluation matrix that consists of the alternative versus criteria array. Analyses of the matrix using the MCDM techniques result in selecting the most satisfying alternative in the case of CP and CGT and narrowing the choice to a few non-dominated alternatives (here, two) in the case of ELECTRE I.

AB - Multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques are used to analyze a multiobjective wastewater management problem in order to select an appropriate management scheme. A specific case study consisting of 15 alternative management schemes is evaluated with respect to 12 noncommensurable, discrete criteria, using three different MCDM techniques; compromise programming (CP), cooperative game theory (CGT), and ELECTRE I. The case study is the Nogales International Wastewater Management Project, which treats wastewater coming from the twin cities of Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico. The problem is formulated in a multicriterion context in terms of objectives, specifications, criteria, criterion scales, and construction of an evaluation matrix that consists of the alternative versus criteria array. Analyses of the matrix using the MCDM techniques result in selecting the most satisfying alternative in the case of CP and CGT and narrowing the choice to a few non-dominated alternatives (here, two) in the case of ELECTRE I.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024042191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024042191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:4(383)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:4(383)

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 383

EP - 398

JO - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9496

IS - 4

ER -