Abstract
Two real-life examples are presented to show how multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques can help hydropower engineers mitigate the environmental and social effects of hydropower development and operation. A brief introduction and overview of MCDM is presented, consisting of an 11-step process that starts with problem definition and ends with implementation. A typology of MCDM is provided, dividing the techniques into three groups: outranking, distance-based, and value- or utility-based types. The operation of the Upper Isar River project in Bavaria is analyzed by means of a value technique and an outranking technique called multicriterion Q-analysis. Fourteen criteria are considered in that study, including power production, habitat quality for four groups of species, aesthetics, several recreation indices, minimum flows, and phosphorus loadings. The case study of the Erlauf River Division in Austria is evaluated using a distance-based technique, called composite programming, combined with Monte Carlo simulation. An outcome of that study is that the facility’s owners have increased the minimum instream flow in order to protect ecological values.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 132-153 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Energy Engineering |
Volume | 115 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1989 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Fuel Technology
Cite this
Multicriterion analysis of hydropower operation. / Duckstein, L.; Tecle, Aregai; Nachnebel, H. P.; Hobbs, B. F.
In: Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 3, 1989, p. 132-153.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicriterion analysis of hydropower operation
AU - Duckstein, L.
AU - Tecle, Aregai
AU - Nachnebel, H. P.
AU - Hobbs, B. F.
PY - 1989
Y1 - 1989
N2 - Two real-life examples are presented to show how multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques can help hydropower engineers mitigate the environmental and social effects of hydropower development and operation. A brief introduction and overview of MCDM is presented, consisting of an 11-step process that starts with problem definition and ends with implementation. A typology of MCDM is provided, dividing the techniques into three groups: outranking, distance-based, and value- or utility-based types. The operation of the Upper Isar River project in Bavaria is analyzed by means of a value technique and an outranking technique called multicriterion Q-analysis. Fourteen criteria are considered in that study, including power production, habitat quality for four groups of species, aesthetics, several recreation indices, minimum flows, and phosphorus loadings. The case study of the Erlauf River Division in Austria is evaluated using a distance-based technique, called composite programming, combined with Monte Carlo simulation. An outcome of that study is that the facility’s owners have increased the minimum instream flow in order to protect ecological values.
AB - Two real-life examples are presented to show how multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) techniques can help hydropower engineers mitigate the environmental and social effects of hydropower development and operation. A brief introduction and overview of MCDM is presented, consisting of an 11-step process that starts with problem definition and ends with implementation. A typology of MCDM is provided, dividing the techniques into three groups: outranking, distance-based, and value- or utility-based types. The operation of the Upper Isar River project in Bavaria is analyzed by means of a value technique and an outranking technique called multicriterion Q-analysis. Fourteen criteria are considered in that study, including power production, habitat quality for four groups of species, aesthetics, several recreation indices, minimum flows, and phosphorus loadings. The case study of the Erlauf River Division in Austria is evaluated using a distance-based technique, called composite programming, combined with Monte Carlo simulation. An outcome of that study is that the facility’s owners have increased the minimum instream flow in order to protect ecological values.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024856785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024856785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1989)115:3(132)
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1989)115:3(132)
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0024856785
VL - 115
SP - 132
EP - 153
JO - Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE
JF - Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE
SN - 0733-9402
IS - 3
ER -