Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial environments

C. M. Pace, Alice C Gibb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mudskippers use pectoral fins for their primary mode of locomotion on land and pectoral fins in conjunction with the axial musculature and caudal fin to move in water. We hypothesized that distinct pectoral fin movements enable effective locomotion in each environment. Additionally, we made three functional predictions about fin movements during locomotion on land versus water: the pectoral fin is depressed more on land than in water; the pectoral fin will have greater changes in fin area between propulsive and recovery phases in water versus land; anterior and posterior excursions will be greater on land than in water. Locomotion was recorded in each environment using a high-speed digital-imaging system and kinematic variables were calculated from digitized landmark points. Variables were analyzed using principal components analysis and matched pairs t-tests. Mudskippers produce distinct kinematic patterns across environments (P<0.003), although only some of our predictions were supported. The magnitude of fin depression is the same across habitats. However, depression occurs during the propulsive phase on land (by -0.60cm), whereas during the propulsive phase in water the fin is elevated (by +0.13cm). We were unable to support the hypothesis that fin orientation differs between environments. Lastly, anterior extension of the fin is greater on land (1.8cm, versus 1.3cm in water), creating a larger stride length in this environment. We posit that the mudskipper pectoral fin may facilitate stability in water and thrust production on land, and suggest that the robust fin morphology of the goby lineage may predispose species within this group to terrestrial locomotion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2279-2286
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume212
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2009

Fingerprint

terrestrial environment
kinematics
Biomechanical Phenomena
aquatic environment
fins
locomotion
Locomotion
Water
water
land
prediction
Principal Component Analysis
Ecosystem
principal component analysis
thrust
habitat

Keywords

  • Amphibious fishes
  • Crutching
  • Locomotion
  • Mudskipper
  • Periophthalmus
  • Swimming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Physiology
  • Insect Science
  • Aquatic Science

Cite this

Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial environments. / Pace, C. M.; Gibb, Alice C.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 212, No. 14, 15.07.2009, p. 2279-2286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6acd4ae5f7ae4cab9dcb8a204d6b69ca,
title = "Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial environments",
abstract = "Mudskippers use pectoral fins for their primary mode of locomotion on land and pectoral fins in conjunction with the axial musculature and caudal fin to move in water. We hypothesized that distinct pectoral fin movements enable effective locomotion in each environment. Additionally, we made three functional predictions about fin movements during locomotion on land versus water: the pectoral fin is depressed more on land than in water; the pectoral fin will have greater changes in fin area between propulsive and recovery phases in water versus land; anterior and posterior excursions will be greater on land than in water. Locomotion was recorded in each environment using a high-speed digital-imaging system and kinematic variables were calculated from digitized landmark points. Variables were analyzed using principal components analysis and matched pairs t-tests. Mudskippers produce distinct kinematic patterns across environments (P<0.003), although only some of our predictions were supported. The magnitude of fin depression is the same across habitats. However, depression occurs during the propulsive phase on land (by -0.60cm), whereas during the propulsive phase in water the fin is elevated (by +0.13cm). We were unable to support the hypothesis that fin orientation differs between environments. Lastly, anterior extension of the fin is greater on land (1.8cm, versus 1.3cm in water), creating a larger stride length in this environment. We posit that the mudskipper pectoral fin may facilitate stability in water and thrust production on land, and suggest that the robust fin morphology of the goby lineage may predispose species within this group to terrestrial locomotion.",
keywords = "Amphibious fishes, Crutching, Locomotion, Mudskipper, Periophthalmus, Swimming",
author = "Pace, {C. M.} and Gibb, {Alice C}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.029041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "212",
pages = "2279--2286",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial environments

AU - Pace, C. M.

AU - Gibb, Alice C

PY - 2009/7/15

Y1 - 2009/7/15

N2 - Mudskippers use pectoral fins for their primary mode of locomotion on land and pectoral fins in conjunction with the axial musculature and caudal fin to move in water. We hypothesized that distinct pectoral fin movements enable effective locomotion in each environment. Additionally, we made three functional predictions about fin movements during locomotion on land versus water: the pectoral fin is depressed more on land than in water; the pectoral fin will have greater changes in fin area between propulsive and recovery phases in water versus land; anterior and posterior excursions will be greater on land than in water. Locomotion was recorded in each environment using a high-speed digital-imaging system and kinematic variables were calculated from digitized landmark points. Variables were analyzed using principal components analysis and matched pairs t-tests. Mudskippers produce distinct kinematic patterns across environments (P<0.003), although only some of our predictions were supported. The magnitude of fin depression is the same across habitats. However, depression occurs during the propulsive phase on land (by -0.60cm), whereas during the propulsive phase in water the fin is elevated (by +0.13cm). We were unable to support the hypothesis that fin orientation differs between environments. Lastly, anterior extension of the fin is greater on land (1.8cm, versus 1.3cm in water), creating a larger stride length in this environment. We posit that the mudskipper pectoral fin may facilitate stability in water and thrust production on land, and suggest that the robust fin morphology of the goby lineage may predispose species within this group to terrestrial locomotion.

AB - Mudskippers use pectoral fins for their primary mode of locomotion on land and pectoral fins in conjunction with the axial musculature and caudal fin to move in water. We hypothesized that distinct pectoral fin movements enable effective locomotion in each environment. Additionally, we made three functional predictions about fin movements during locomotion on land versus water: the pectoral fin is depressed more on land than in water; the pectoral fin will have greater changes in fin area between propulsive and recovery phases in water versus land; anterior and posterior excursions will be greater on land than in water. Locomotion was recorded in each environment using a high-speed digital-imaging system and kinematic variables were calculated from digitized landmark points. Variables were analyzed using principal components analysis and matched pairs t-tests. Mudskippers produce distinct kinematic patterns across environments (P<0.003), although only some of our predictions were supported. The magnitude of fin depression is the same across habitats. However, depression occurs during the propulsive phase on land (by -0.60cm), whereas during the propulsive phase in water the fin is elevated (by +0.13cm). We were unable to support the hypothesis that fin orientation differs between environments. Lastly, anterior extension of the fin is greater on land (1.8cm, versus 1.3cm in water), creating a larger stride length in this environment. We posit that the mudskipper pectoral fin may facilitate stability in water and thrust production on land, and suggest that the robust fin morphology of the goby lineage may predispose species within this group to terrestrial locomotion.

KW - Amphibious fishes

KW - Crutching

KW - Locomotion

KW - Mudskipper

KW - Periophthalmus

KW - Swimming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650114878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650114878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.029041

DO - 10.1242/jeb.029041

M3 - Article

VL - 212

SP - 2279

EP - 2286

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 14

ER -