Monitoring the scientist’s body

The biosphere 2 human exhibition

Janna Jones, Dana Beasley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article investigates the ideological and rhetorical consequences of exhibiting the scientist’s body during the 1991–93 Biosphere 2 mission. The facility’s presentation of a technological future was overshadowed by the inability of the Biospherians to thrive within the confines of Biosphere 2, made known to the public via intrusive and unconventional methods of observation. Despite the dome’s popularity, and the previous successes of similarly focused exhibits of science and technology, the inclusion of the Biospherians as part of the exhibition obscured the intended ideology of progress, revealing instead a narrative of the vulnerabilities of humankind. In spite of the rhetorical failure of the 1990s mission, the 2018 Biosphere 2 has recaptured the ideology of scientific progress by removing the scientist’s body from the display and affecting a more publicly accessible research facility, thus allowing for a subsequent rebalancing of traditional power between the scientist and the public.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-246
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Curatorial Studies
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Monitoring
Rhetoric
Ideology
Vulnerability
Dome
Scientific Progress
1990s
Humankind
Inclusion

Keywords

  • Biosphere 2
  • Calorie restricted diet
  • Ecology
  • Exposition
  • Human exhibition
  • Science and technology
  • Scientific credibility
  • World’s Fairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Conservation
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Museology

Cite this

Monitoring the scientist’s body : The biosphere 2 human exhibition. / Jones, Janna; Beasley, Dana.

In: Journal of Curatorial Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.10.2018, p. 224-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28960126171144cc93ebd0e6a0aefa1b,
title = "Monitoring the scientist’s body: The biosphere 2 human exhibition",
abstract = "This article investigates the ideological and rhetorical consequences of exhibiting the scientist’s body during the 1991–93 Biosphere 2 mission. The facility’s presentation of a technological future was overshadowed by the inability of the Biospherians to thrive within the confines of Biosphere 2, made known to the public via intrusive and unconventional methods of observation. Despite the dome’s popularity, and the previous successes of similarly focused exhibits of science and technology, the inclusion of the Biospherians as part of the exhibition obscured the intended ideology of progress, revealing instead a narrative of the vulnerabilities of humankind. In spite of the rhetorical failure of the 1990s mission, the 2018 Biosphere 2 has recaptured the ideology of scientific progress by removing the scientist’s body from the display and affecting a more publicly accessible research facility, thus allowing for a subsequent rebalancing of traditional power between the scientist and the public.",
keywords = "Biosphere 2, Calorie restricted diet, Ecology, Exposition, Human exhibition, Science and technology, Scientific credibility, World’s Fairs",
author = "Janna Jones and Dana Beasley",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/jcs.7.2.224_1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "224--246",
journal = "Journal of Curatorial Studies",
issn = "2045-5836",
publisher = "Intellect Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring the scientist’s body

T2 - The biosphere 2 human exhibition

AU - Jones, Janna

AU - Beasley, Dana

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - This article investigates the ideological and rhetorical consequences of exhibiting the scientist’s body during the 1991–93 Biosphere 2 mission. The facility’s presentation of a technological future was overshadowed by the inability of the Biospherians to thrive within the confines of Biosphere 2, made known to the public via intrusive and unconventional methods of observation. Despite the dome’s popularity, and the previous successes of similarly focused exhibits of science and technology, the inclusion of the Biospherians as part of the exhibition obscured the intended ideology of progress, revealing instead a narrative of the vulnerabilities of humankind. In spite of the rhetorical failure of the 1990s mission, the 2018 Biosphere 2 has recaptured the ideology of scientific progress by removing the scientist’s body from the display and affecting a more publicly accessible research facility, thus allowing for a subsequent rebalancing of traditional power between the scientist and the public.

AB - This article investigates the ideological and rhetorical consequences of exhibiting the scientist’s body during the 1991–93 Biosphere 2 mission. The facility’s presentation of a technological future was overshadowed by the inability of the Biospherians to thrive within the confines of Biosphere 2, made known to the public via intrusive and unconventional methods of observation. Despite the dome’s popularity, and the previous successes of similarly focused exhibits of science and technology, the inclusion of the Biospherians as part of the exhibition obscured the intended ideology of progress, revealing instead a narrative of the vulnerabilities of humankind. In spite of the rhetorical failure of the 1990s mission, the 2018 Biosphere 2 has recaptured the ideology of scientific progress by removing the scientist’s body from the display and affecting a more publicly accessible research facility, thus allowing for a subsequent rebalancing of traditional power between the scientist and the public.

KW - Biosphere 2

KW - Calorie restricted diet

KW - Ecology

KW - Exposition

KW - Human exhibition

KW - Science and technology

KW - Scientific credibility

KW - World’s Fairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063670829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063670829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1386/jcs.7.2.224_1

DO - 10.1386/jcs.7.2.224_1

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 224

EP - 246

JO - Journal of Curatorial Studies

JF - Journal of Curatorial Studies

SN - 2045-5836

IS - 2

ER -