Mixed effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats

A review

Abigail Tobin, Carol L Chambers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Caves and abandoned mines, roosting environments for many bat species including subterranean obligates, are under human pressure (e.g., recreation) and pose threats to humans. Gating entrances of these subterranean features prevents human entry while protecting habitat for bats. However, bat response to these gates is not well understood and no comprehensive synthesis with species-specific recommendations on protection measures for bat roosts exists. We reviewed literature on effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats and roost microclimate and found 22 studies and reports from North America, Australia, Europe, and Asia. Ten studies examined effects of gating on bat use, 9 described behavioral responses to gates, and 5 presented effects of gates on roost microclimate. Older gate designs (1950–1970), such as cement walls or iron doors, negatively affected bat use and roost microclimate, but responses to modern (1970s to present), bat-compatible gate designs varied. Short-term responses of bats to bat-compatible gates were negative and included increases in energetically expensive flight behaviors. Although long-term responses included a mix of population and species trends, we attribute these mixed responses in part to differences in flight agility among species. Bats with moderate to high agility (low wing loading, broad call bandwidths) adjust to gates, but species with low agility (high wing loading and narrow call bandwidths) may abandon sites after gating. Other factors including bat density in roosts and size of the cave or mine entrance also affect acceptance of gates and should be considered in gate design. Current gate designs are adequate for most species. Based on available literature, we recommend use of bat-compatible gates with horizontal bar spacing of 14.6 cm, bar types that offer high structural rigidity in areas where vandalism is likely, and periodic monitoring of gates to ensure they remain in good condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1149-1160
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume81
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

bat
Chiroptera
habitat
habitats
microclimate
caves
effect
cave
flight
flight behavior
roosting
abandoned mine
recreation
cement
behavioral response
rigidity
spacing
spatial distribution
iron

Keywords

  • abandoned mines
  • caves
  • Chiroptera
  • Corynorhinus townsendii
  • gates
  • Myotis grisescens
  • Myotis sodalis
  • wing loading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Mixed effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats : A review. / Tobin, Abigail; Chambers, Carol L.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 81, No. 7, 01.09.2017, p. 1149-1160.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{2f931bb4325b4682a935d431a7bb1bfe,
title = "Mixed effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats: A review",
abstract = "Caves and abandoned mines, roosting environments for many bat species including subterranean obligates, are under human pressure (e.g., recreation) and pose threats to humans. Gating entrances of these subterranean features prevents human entry while protecting habitat for bats. However, bat response to these gates is not well understood and no comprehensive synthesis with species-specific recommendations on protection measures for bat roosts exists. We reviewed literature on effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats and roost microclimate and found 22 studies and reports from North America, Australia, Europe, and Asia. Ten studies examined effects of gating on bat use, 9 described behavioral responses to gates, and 5 presented effects of gates on roost microclimate. Older gate designs (1950–1970), such as cement walls or iron doors, negatively affected bat use and roost microclimate, but responses to modern (1970s to present), bat-compatible gate designs varied. Short-term responses of bats to bat-compatible gates were negative and included increases in energetically expensive flight behaviors. Although long-term responses included a mix of population and species trends, we attribute these mixed responses in part to differences in flight agility among species. Bats with moderate to high agility (low wing loading, broad call bandwidths) adjust to gates, but species with low agility (high wing loading and narrow call bandwidths) may abandon sites after gating. Other factors including bat density in roosts and size of the cave or mine entrance also affect acceptance of gates and should be considered in gate design. Current gate designs are adequate for most species. Based on available literature, we recommend use of bat-compatible gates with horizontal bar spacing of 14.6 cm, bar types that offer high structural rigidity in areas where vandalism is likely, and periodic monitoring of gates to ensure they remain in good condition.",
keywords = "abandoned mines, caves, Chiroptera, Corynorhinus townsendii, gates, Myotis grisescens, Myotis sodalis, wing loading",
author = "Abigail Tobin and Chambers, {Carol L}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jwmg.21287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "1149--1160",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mixed effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats

T2 - A review

AU - Tobin, Abigail

AU - Chambers, Carol L

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Caves and abandoned mines, roosting environments for many bat species including subterranean obligates, are under human pressure (e.g., recreation) and pose threats to humans. Gating entrances of these subterranean features prevents human entry while protecting habitat for bats. However, bat response to these gates is not well understood and no comprehensive synthesis with species-specific recommendations on protection measures for bat roosts exists. We reviewed literature on effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats and roost microclimate and found 22 studies and reports from North America, Australia, Europe, and Asia. Ten studies examined effects of gating on bat use, 9 described behavioral responses to gates, and 5 presented effects of gates on roost microclimate. Older gate designs (1950–1970), such as cement walls or iron doors, negatively affected bat use and roost microclimate, but responses to modern (1970s to present), bat-compatible gate designs varied. Short-term responses of bats to bat-compatible gates were negative and included increases in energetically expensive flight behaviors. Although long-term responses included a mix of population and species trends, we attribute these mixed responses in part to differences in flight agility among species. Bats with moderate to high agility (low wing loading, broad call bandwidths) adjust to gates, but species with low agility (high wing loading and narrow call bandwidths) may abandon sites after gating. Other factors including bat density in roosts and size of the cave or mine entrance also affect acceptance of gates and should be considered in gate design. Current gate designs are adequate for most species. Based on available literature, we recommend use of bat-compatible gates with horizontal bar spacing of 14.6 cm, bar types that offer high structural rigidity in areas where vandalism is likely, and periodic monitoring of gates to ensure they remain in good condition.

AB - Caves and abandoned mines, roosting environments for many bat species including subterranean obligates, are under human pressure (e.g., recreation) and pose threats to humans. Gating entrances of these subterranean features prevents human entry while protecting habitat for bats. However, bat response to these gates is not well understood and no comprehensive synthesis with species-specific recommendations on protection measures for bat roosts exists. We reviewed literature on effects of gating subterranean habitat on bats and roost microclimate and found 22 studies and reports from North America, Australia, Europe, and Asia. Ten studies examined effects of gating on bat use, 9 described behavioral responses to gates, and 5 presented effects of gates on roost microclimate. Older gate designs (1950–1970), such as cement walls or iron doors, negatively affected bat use and roost microclimate, but responses to modern (1970s to present), bat-compatible gate designs varied. Short-term responses of bats to bat-compatible gates were negative and included increases in energetically expensive flight behaviors. Although long-term responses included a mix of population and species trends, we attribute these mixed responses in part to differences in flight agility among species. Bats with moderate to high agility (low wing loading, broad call bandwidths) adjust to gates, but species with low agility (high wing loading and narrow call bandwidths) may abandon sites after gating. Other factors including bat density in roosts and size of the cave or mine entrance also affect acceptance of gates and should be considered in gate design. Current gate designs are adequate for most species. Based on available literature, we recommend use of bat-compatible gates with horizontal bar spacing of 14.6 cm, bar types that offer high structural rigidity in areas where vandalism is likely, and periodic monitoring of gates to ensure they remain in good condition.

KW - abandoned mines

KW - caves

KW - Chiroptera

KW - Corynorhinus townsendii

KW - gates

KW - Myotis grisescens

KW - Myotis sodalis

KW - wing loading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021431213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021431213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jwmg.21287

DO - 10.1002/jwmg.21287

M3 - Review article

VL - 81

SP - 1149

EP - 1160

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 7

ER -