# Metabolic accommodation to running on a body weight-supported treadmill

David K P McNeill, Hendrik de Heer, Cody P. Williams, Richard J Coast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

### Abstract

Conclusions: An accommodation effect of running on a treadmill with LBPP was observed and reached after 60 min of running (4 trials of 15 min). The accommodation effect was the largest at the greatest level of body weight support. These data suggest the importance of an accommodation period for reliable measures of metabolic cost to be made.

Purpose: Body weight-supported treadmill training using positive air pressure has become increasingly popular, but little is known about the metabolic adaptations to these treadmills. This study aimed to evaluate the existence and length of a metabolic accommodation period to running on a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill.

Methods: A total of eight recreational runners (5 males and 3 females) ran 15 min trials (5 min at 50, 70, and 90 % body weight) on the AlterG Anti-gravity<sup>®</sup> P200 treadmill. No verbal instruction was given on how to run on the device. Their trial pace corresponded to 70–80 % of their velocity measured at $$\dot{V}$$V˙O<inf>2</inf>max on a standard treadmill. Trials were continued until no significant metabolic change was observed. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze changes in $$\dot{V}$$V˙O<inf>2</inf> across trials and levels of unloading.

Results: Participants completed 7 trials. Comparing trial 1 to the average of trials 5, 6, and 7, $$\dot{V}$$V˙O<inf>2</inf> decreased from 29.6 ± 3.8 to 23.6 ± 4.4 ml/kg/min at 50 % body weight (~20 % reduction), from 33.7 ± 4.5 to 29.2 ± 5.1 ml/kg/min at 70 % body weight (~13 % reduction), and from 41.0 ± 7.7 to 36.6 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min at 90 % body weight (~11 % reduction). No significant reduction occurred after trial 4 at any level of support.

Original language English (US) 905-910 6 European Journal of Applied Physiology 115 5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-3071-y Published - May 1 2015

### Fingerprint

Body Weight
Weight Loss
Air Pressure
Pressure
Gravitation
Analysis of Variance
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

### Keywords

• Accommodation
• AlterG<sup>®</sup>
• Body weight support
• Metabolic test

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
• Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
• Physiology (medical)

### Cite this

Metabolic accommodation to running on a body weight-supported treadmill. / McNeill, David K P; de Heer, Hendrik; Williams, Cody P.; Coast, Richard J.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 115, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 905-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38d5b960bc64493699ef750a7db46eef,
title = "Metabolic accommodation to running on a body weight-supported treadmill",
abstract = "Conclusions: An accommodation effect of running on a treadmill with LBPP was observed and reached after 60 min of running (4 trials of 15 min). The accommodation effect was the largest at the greatest level of body weight support. These data suggest the importance of an accommodation period for reliable measures of metabolic cost to be made.Purpose: Body weight-supported treadmill training using positive air pressure has become increasingly popular, but little is known about the metabolic adaptations to these treadmills. This study aimed to evaluate the existence and length of a metabolic accommodation period to running on a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill.Methods: A total of eight recreational runners (5 males and 3 females) ran 15 min trials (5 min at 50, 70, and 90 {\%} body weight) on the AlterG Anti-gravity{\circledR} P200 treadmill. No verbal instruction was given on how to run on the device. Their trial pace corresponded to 70–80 {\%} of their velocity measured at $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2max on a standard treadmill. Trials were continued until no significant metabolic change was observed. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze changes in $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2 across trials and levels of unloading.Results: Participants completed 7 trials. Comparing trial 1 to the average of trials 5, 6, and 7, $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2 decreased from 29.6 ± 3.8 to 23.6 ± 4.4 ml/kg/min at 50 {\%} body weight (~20 {\%} reduction), from 33.7 ± 4.5 to 29.2 ± 5.1 ml/kg/min at 70 {\%} body weight (~13 {\%} reduction), and from 41.0 ± 7.7 to 36.6 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min at 90 {\%} body weight (~11 {\%} reduction). No significant reduction occurred after trial 4 at any level of support.",
author = "McNeill, {David K P} and {de Heer}, Hendrik and Williams, {Cody P.} and Coast, {Richard J}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-014-3071-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "905--910",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metabolic accommodation to running on a body weight-supported treadmill

AU - McNeill, David K P

AU - de Heer, Hendrik

AU - Williams, Cody P.

AU - Coast, Richard J

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Conclusions: An accommodation effect of running on a treadmill with LBPP was observed and reached after 60 min of running (4 trials of 15 min). The accommodation effect was the largest at the greatest level of body weight support. These data suggest the importance of an accommodation period for reliable measures of metabolic cost to be made.Purpose: Body weight-supported treadmill training using positive air pressure has become increasingly popular, but little is known about the metabolic adaptations to these treadmills. This study aimed to evaluate the existence and length of a metabolic accommodation period to running on a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill.Methods: A total of eight recreational runners (5 males and 3 females) ran 15 min trials (5 min at 50, 70, and 90 % body weight) on the AlterG Anti-gravity® P200 treadmill. No verbal instruction was given on how to run on the device. Their trial pace corresponded to 70–80 % of their velocity measured at $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2max on a standard treadmill. Trials were continued until no significant metabolic change was observed. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze changes in $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2 across trials and levels of unloading.Results: Participants completed 7 trials. Comparing trial 1 to the average of trials 5, 6, and 7, $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2 decreased from 29.6 ± 3.8 to 23.6 ± 4.4 ml/kg/min at 50 % body weight (~20 % reduction), from 33.7 ± 4.5 to 29.2 ± 5.1 ml/kg/min at 70 % body weight (~13 % reduction), and from 41.0 ± 7.7 to 36.6 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min at 90 % body weight (~11 % reduction). No significant reduction occurred after trial 4 at any level of support.

AB - Conclusions: An accommodation effect of running on a treadmill with LBPP was observed and reached after 60 min of running (4 trials of 15 min). The accommodation effect was the largest at the greatest level of body weight support. These data suggest the importance of an accommodation period for reliable measures of metabolic cost to be made.Purpose: Body weight-supported treadmill training using positive air pressure has become increasingly popular, but little is known about the metabolic adaptations to these treadmills. This study aimed to evaluate the existence and length of a metabolic accommodation period to running on a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmill.Methods: A total of eight recreational runners (5 males and 3 females) ran 15 min trials (5 min at 50, 70, and 90 % body weight) on the AlterG Anti-gravity® P200 treadmill. No verbal instruction was given on how to run on the device. Their trial pace corresponded to 70–80 % of their velocity measured at $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2max on a standard treadmill. Trials were continued until no significant metabolic change was observed. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze changes in $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2 across trials and levels of unloading.Results: Participants completed 7 trials. Comparing trial 1 to the average of trials 5, 6, and 7, $$\dot{V}$$V˙O2 decreased from 29.6 ± 3.8 to 23.6 ± 4.4 ml/kg/min at 50 % body weight (~20 % reduction), from 33.7 ± 4.5 to 29.2 ± 5.1 ml/kg/min at 70 % body weight (~13 % reduction), and from 41.0 ± 7.7 to 36.6 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min at 90 % body weight (~11 % reduction). No significant reduction occurred after trial 4 at any level of support.

KW - Accommodation

KW - AlterG<sup>®</sup>

KW - Body weight support

KW - Metabolic test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939957282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939957282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-014-3071-y

DO - 10.1007/s00421-014-3071-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 25488671

AN - SCOPUS:84939957282

VL - 115

SP - 905

EP - 910

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 5

ER -