Medical discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discourse plays an important role in medicine, and medical discourse in the broadest sense (discourse in and about healing, curing, or therapy; expressions of suffering; and relevant language ideologies) has profound anthropological significance. As modes of social action, writing and speaking help constitute medical institutions, curative practices, and relations of authority in and beyond particular healing encounters. This review describes cultural variation in medical discourse and variation across genres and registers. It then surveys two approaches to analyzing medical discourse: conversation analysis (CA) and discourse studies echoing Foucault's work, attempting to spur dialogue between them. Such dialogue could be fruitful because, despite hesitancy to invoke macrosocial variables, conversation analysts as well as Foucaultian discourse analysts have reflected onmedical authority. Finally, the article reviews recent attempts to contextualize closely analyzed interactions-written exchanges as well as face-to-face clinical encounters-vis-à-vis the global circulation of linguistic forms and ideologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-215
Number of pages17
JournalAnnual Review of Anthropology
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

discourse
Ideologies
dialogue
conversation analysis
Medical Discourse
Discourse
speaking
genre
conversation
medicine
Authority
Healing
linguistics
interaction
language
Interaction
Linguistic Form
Linguistic Ideology
Medicine
Discourse Studies

Keywords

  • Authority
  • Circulation
  • Conversation analysis
  • Interaction
  • Textuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Medical discourse. / Wilce Jr, James M.

In: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 38, 10.2009, p. 199-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{122784d9f2444c2c91b290b3171e81e7,
title = "Medical discourse",
abstract = "Discourse plays an important role in medicine, and medical discourse in the broadest sense (discourse in and about healing, curing, or therapy; expressions of suffering; and relevant language ideologies) has profound anthropological significance. As modes of social action, writing and speaking help constitute medical institutions, curative practices, and relations of authority in and beyond particular healing encounters. This review describes cultural variation in medical discourse and variation across genres and registers. It then surveys two approaches to analyzing medical discourse: conversation analysis (CA) and discourse studies echoing Foucault's work, attempting to spur dialogue between them. Such dialogue could be fruitful because, despite hesitancy to invoke macrosocial variables, conversation analysts as well as Foucaultian discourse analysts have reflected onmedical authority. Finally, the article reviews recent attempts to contextualize closely analyzed interactions-written exchanges as well as face-to-face clinical encounters-vis-{\`a}-vis the global circulation of linguistic forms and ideologies.",
keywords = "Authority, Circulation, Conversation analysis, Interaction, Textuality",
author = "{Wilce Jr}, {James M}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164450",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "199--215",
journal = "Annual Review of Anthropology",
issn = "0084-6570",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical discourse

AU - Wilce Jr, James M

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Discourse plays an important role in medicine, and medical discourse in the broadest sense (discourse in and about healing, curing, or therapy; expressions of suffering; and relevant language ideologies) has profound anthropological significance. As modes of social action, writing and speaking help constitute medical institutions, curative practices, and relations of authority in and beyond particular healing encounters. This review describes cultural variation in medical discourse and variation across genres and registers. It then surveys two approaches to analyzing medical discourse: conversation analysis (CA) and discourse studies echoing Foucault's work, attempting to spur dialogue between them. Such dialogue could be fruitful because, despite hesitancy to invoke macrosocial variables, conversation analysts as well as Foucaultian discourse analysts have reflected onmedical authority. Finally, the article reviews recent attempts to contextualize closely analyzed interactions-written exchanges as well as face-to-face clinical encounters-vis-à-vis the global circulation of linguistic forms and ideologies.

AB - Discourse plays an important role in medicine, and medical discourse in the broadest sense (discourse in and about healing, curing, or therapy; expressions of suffering; and relevant language ideologies) has profound anthropological significance. As modes of social action, writing and speaking help constitute medical institutions, curative practices, and relations of authority in and beyond particular healing encounters. This review describes cultural variation in medical discourse and variation across genres and registers. It then surveys two approaches to analyzing medical discourse: conversation analysis (CA) and discourse studies echoing Foucault's work, attempting to spur dialogue between them. Such dialogue could be fruitful because, despite hesitancy to invoke macrosocial variables, conversation analysts as well as Foucaultian discourse analysts have reflected onmedical authority. Finally, the article reviews recent attempts to contextualize closely analyzed interactions-written exchanges as well as face-to-face clinical encounters-vis-à-vis the global circulation of linguistic forms and ideologies.

KW - Authority

KW - Circulation

KW - Conversation analysis

KW - Interaction

KW - Textuality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350445935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350445935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164450

DO - 10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164450

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350445935

VL - 38

SP - 199

EP - 215

JO - Annual Review of Anthropology

JF - Annual Review of Anthropology

SN - 0084-6570

ER -