Mechanics and neuromorphology of feeding in amphibians

Gerhard Roth, Ksa C. Nishikawa, David B. Wake, Ursula Dicke, Toshiya Matsushima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Salamanders and frogs exhibit strong similarities in their habitats, prey preferences and foraging strategies. Despite these similarities, they differ profoundly in the structure and function of the adult feeding apparatus, and in the participation of cranial and spinal nerves and nuclei in the control of feeding behavior. In frogs, the hyolingual skeleton plays no role in tongue projection. Only the tongue is projected out of the mouth under the control of the nn. trigeminus (tongue protraction) and hypoglossus (tongue protraction and retraction). In all salamanders, feeding is based on forward movement of the hyolingual apparatus, which is folded into a slender, far-reaching projectile in the most highly derived salamanders. Tongue protraction is controlled by nn. glossopharyngeus and vagus, and tongue retraction is controlled by the first and second spinal nerves. All muscles related to feeding are activated sequentially in frogs and simultaneously in salamanders. While the descending pathways to the brainstem and cervical spinal motor nuclei are similar in frogs and salamanders, differences in muscle function and activation pattern imply that the premotor reticular formation is also different. In frog tadpoles and salamander larvae, the hyobranchial apparatus plays different roles in feeding and breathing. This has led to differential loss, acquisition and change of function of musculoskeletal elements during the ontogeny and phylogeny of the adult feeding apparatus in frogs and salamanders. These differences in the musculoskeletal periphery imply that a reorganization at or above the level of the reticular formation is likely to have occurred in frogs, but not in salamanders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-135
Number of pages21
JournalNetherlands Journal of Zoology
Volume40
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

salamanders and newts
mechanics
amphibian
amphibians
frog
tongue
frogs
nerve tissue
muscle
prey preference
muscles
salamander
brain stem
tadpoles
feeding behavior
ontogeny
skeleton
breathing
mouth
phylogeny

Keywords

  • Feeding
  • Frogs
  • Kinematics
  • Neuromotor control
  • Ontogeny
  • Salamanders
  • Tongue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Mechanics and neuromorphology of feeding in amphibians. / Roth, Gerhard; Nishikawa, Ksa C.; Wake, David B.; Dicke, Ursula; Matsushima, Toshiya.

In: Netherlands Journal of Zoology, Vol. 40, No. 1-2, 1989, p. 115-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roth, G, Nishikawa, KC, Wake, DB, Dicke, U & Matsushima, T 1989, 'Mechanics and neuromorphology of feeding in amphibians', Netherlands Journal of Zoology, vol. 40, no. 1-2, pp. 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854289X00228
Roth, Gerhard ; Nishikawa, Ksa C. ; Wake, David B. ; Dicke, Ursula ; Matsushima, Toshiya. / Mechanics and neuromorphology of feeding in amphibians. In: Netherlands Journal of Zoology. 1989 ; Vol. 40, No. 1-2. pp. 115-135.
@article{5c31ed1ed7254f6d92c8d5ebad55721d,
title = "Mechanics and neuromorphology of feeding in amphibians",
abstract = "Salamanders and frogs exhibit strong similarities in their habitats, prey preferences and foraging strategies. Despite these similarities, they differ profoundly in the structure and function of the adult feeding apparatus, and in the participation of cranial and spinal nerves and nuclei in the control of feeding behavior. In frogs, the hyolingual skeleton plays no role in tongue projection. Only the tongue is projected out of the mouth under the control of the nn. trigeminus (tongue protraction) and hypoglossus (tongue protraction and retraction). In all salamanders, feeding is based on forward movement of the hyolingual apparatus, which is folded into a slender, far-reaching projectile in the most highly derived salamanders. Tongue protraction is controlled by nn. glossopharyngeus and vagus, and tongue retraction is controlled by the first and second spinal nerves. All muscles related to feeding are activated sequentially in frogs and simultaneously in salamanders. While the descending pathways to the brainstem and cervical spinal motor nuclei are similar in frogs and salamanders, differences in muscle function and activation pattern imply that the premotor reticular formation is also different. In frog tadpoles and salamander larvae, the hyobranchial apparatus plays different roles in feeding and breathing. This has led to differential loss, acquisition and change of function of musculoskeletal elements during the ontogeny and phylogeny of the adult feeding apparatus in frogs and salamanders. These differences in the musculoskeletal periphery imply that a reorganization at or above the level of the reticular formation is likely to have occurred in frogs, but not in salamanders.",
keywords = "Feeding, Frogs, Kinematics, Neuromotor control, Ontogeny, Salamanders, Tongue",
author = "Gerhard Roth and Nishikawa, {Ksa C.} and Wake, {David B.} and Ursula Dicke and Toshiya Matsushima",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1163/156854289X00228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "115--135",
journal = "Animal Biology",
issn = "1570-7555",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanics and neuromorphology of feeding in amphibians

AU - Roth, Gerhard

AU - Nishikawa, Ksa C.

AU - Wake, David B.

AU - Dicke, Ursula

AU - Matsushima, Toshiya

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Salamanders and frogs exhibit strong similarities in their habitats, prey preferences and foraging strategies. Despite these similarities, they differ profoundly in the structure and function of the adult feeding apparatus, and in the participation of cranial and spinal nerves and nuclei in the control of feeding behavior. In frogs, the hyolingual skeleton plays no role in tongue projection. Only the tongue is projected out of the mouth under the control of the nn. trigeminus (tongue protraction) and hypoglossus (tongue protraction and retraction). In all salamanders, feeding is based on forward movement of the hyolingual apparatus, which is folded into a slender, far-reaching projectile in the most highly derived salamanders. Tongue protraction is controlled by nn. glossopharyngeus and vagus, and tongue retraction is controlled by the first and second spinal nerves. All muscles related to feeding are activated sequentially in frogs and simultaneously in salamanders. While the descending pathways to the brainstem and cervical spinal motor nuclei are similar in frogs and salamanders, differences in muscle function and activation pattern imply that the premotor reticular formation is also different. In frog tadpoles and salamander larvae, the hyobranchial apparatus plays different roles in feeding and breathing. This has led to differential loss, acquisition and change of function of musculoskeletal elements during the ontogeny and phylogeny of the adult feeding apparatus in frogs and salamanders. These differences in the musculoskeletal periphery imply that a reorganization at or above the level of the reticular formation is likely to have occurred in frogs, but not in salamanders.

AB - Salamanders and frogs exhibit strong similarities in their habitats, prey preferences and foraging strategies. Despite these similarities, they differ profoundly in the structure and function of the adult feeding apparatus, and in the participation of cranial and spinal nerves and nuclei in the control of feeding behavior. In frogs, the hyolingual skeleton plays no role in tongue projection. Only the tongue is projected out of the mouth under the control of the nn. trigeminus (tongue protraction) and hypoglossus (tongue protraction and retraction). In all salamanders, feeding is based on forward movement of the hyolingual apparatus, which is folded into a slender, far-reaching projectile in the most highly derived salamanders. Tongue protraction is controlled by nn. glossopharyngeus and vagus, and tongue retraction is controlled by the first and second spinal nerves. All muscles related to feeding are activated sequentially in frogs and simultaneously in salamanders. While the descending pathways to the brainstem and cervical spinal motor nuclei are similar in frogs and salamanders, differences in muscle function and activation pattern imply that the premotor reticular formation is also different. In frog tadpoles and salamander larvae, the hyobranchial apparatus plays different roles in feeding and breathing. This has led to differential loss, acquisition and change of function of musculoskeletal elements during the ontogeny and phylogeny of the adult feeding apparatus in frogs and salamanders. These differences in the musculoskeletal periphery imply that a reorganization at or above the level of the reticular formation is likely to have occurred in frogs, but not in salamanders.

KW - Feeding

KW - Frogs

KW - Kinematics

KW - Neuromotor control

KW - Ontogeny

KW - Salamanders

KW - Tongue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040192459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040192459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156854289X00228

DO - 10.1163/156854289X00228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040192459

VL - 40

SP - 115

EP - 135

JO - Animal Biology

JF - Animal Biology

SN - 1570-7555

IS - 1-2

ER -