Maturity selection versus improvement selection

Lessons from a mid-20th century controversy in the silviculture of ponderosa pine

Kevin L. O'Hara, Andrew Youngblood, Kristen M Waring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two rival silvicultural systems for promoting multiaged ponderosa pine stands emerged in the 1930s and 1940s. Maturity selection was developed to move the vast ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) acreage in eastern Oregon and Washington into regulation to limit bark beetle losses. In the Southwest, improvement selection was designed to improve residual growing stock by making stands less susceptible to wind, lightening, and dwarf mistletoe. The primary difference between the systems was the treatment of undesirable smaller trees. Maturity selection tended to ignore them whereas improvement selection removed them. Improvement selection appeared to place a greater emphasis on the future whereas maturity selection focused more on current economic values. The controversy subsided by 1960 because of increased interest in even-aged systems. Although these systems have largely been forgotten, they provide interesting insights to the current trend of increased use of multiaged systems. Both systems involved greater volume removals at longer cutting cycles than current systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-407
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Forestry
Volume108
Issue number8
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

silviculture
Pinus ponderosa
Santalales
silvicultural systems
bark beetles
economic valuation
bark
beetle
economics

Keywords

  • Multiaged
  • Pinus ponderosa
  • Silviculture
  • Single tree selection
  • Uneven-aged

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Maturity selection versus improvement selection : Lessons from a mid-20th century controversy in the silviculture of ponderosa pine. / O'Hara, Kevin L.; Youngblood, Andrew; Waring, Kristen M.

In: Journal of Forestry, Vol. 108, No. 8, 12.2010, p. 397-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45d38806285d412bad248de5aa6ecf8f,
title = "Maturity selection versus improvement selection: Lessons from a mid-20th century controversy in the silviculture of ponderosa pine",
abstract = "Two rival silvicultural systems for promoting multiaged ponderosa pine stands emerged in the 1930s and 1940s. Maturity selection was developed to move the vast ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) acreage in eastern Oregon and Washington into regulation to limit bark beetle losses. In the Southwest, improvement selection was designed to improve residual growing stock by making stands less susceptible to wind, lightening, and dwarf mistletoe. The primary difference between the systems was the treatment of undesirable smaller trees. Maturity selection tended to ignore them whereas improvement selection removed them. Improvement selection appeared to place a greater emphasis on the future whereas maturity selection focused more on current economic values. The controversy subsided by 1960 because of increased interest in even-aged systems. Although these systems have largely been forgotten, they provide interesting insights to the current trend of increased use of multiaged systems. Both systems involved greater volume removals at longer cutting cycles than current systems.",
keywords = "Multiaged, Pinus ponderosa, Silviculture, Single tree selection, Uneven-aged",
author = "O'Hara, {Kevin L.} and Andrew Youngblood and Waring, {Kristen M}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "397--407",
journal = "Journal of Forestry",
issn = "0022-1201",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maturity selection versus improvement selection

T2 - Lessons from a mid-20th century controversy in the silviculture of ponderosa pine

AU - O'Hara, Kevin L.

AU - Youngblood, Andrew

AU - Waring, Kristen M

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Two rival silvicultural systems for promoting multiaged ponderosa pine stands emerged in the 1930s and 1940s. Maturity selection was developed to move the vast ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) acreage in eastern Oregon and Washington into regulation to limit bark beetle losses. In the Southwest, improvement selection was designed to improve residual growing stock by making stands less susceptible to wind, lightening, and dwarf mistletoe. The primary difference between the systems was the treatment of undesirable smaller trees. Maturity selection tended to ignore them whereas improvement selection removed them. Improvement selection appeared to place a greater emphasis on the future whereas maturity selection focused more on current economic values. The controversy subsided by 1960 because of increased interest in even-aged systems. Although these systems have largely been forgotten, they provide interesting insights to the current trend of increased use of multiaged systems. Both systems involved greater volume removals at longer cutting cycles than current systems.

AB - Two rival silvicultural systems for promoting multiaged ponderosa pine stands emerged in the 1930s and 1940s. Maturity selection was developed to move the vast ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) acreage in eastern Oregon and Washington into regulation to limit bark beetle losses. In the Southwest, improvement selection was designed to improve residual growing stock by making stands less susceptible to wind, lightening, and dwarf mistletoe. The primary difference between the systems was the treatment of undesirable smaller trees. Maturity selection tended to ignore them whereas improvement selection removed them. Improvement selection appeared to place a greater emphasis on the future whereas maturity selection focused more on current economic values. The controversy subsided by 1960 because of increased interest in even-aged systems. Although these systems have largely been forgotten, they provide interesting insights to the current trend of increased use of multiaged systems. Both systems involved greater volume removals at longer cutting cycles than current systems.

KW - Multiaged

KW - Pinus ponderosa

KW - Silviculture

KW - Single tree selection

KW - Uneven-aged

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650806890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650806890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 397

EP - 407

JO - Journal of Forestry

JF - Journal of Forestry

SN - 0022-1201

IS - 8

ER -