Manichaeism

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Although in many respects Manichaeism can and should be considered a distinct world religion, it belongs to the larger Christian tradition, broadly construed, through the special place it accords Jesus Christ in its ideology and devotional practices. Arising from the confluence of the early Christian mission with indigenous religious elements of third-century ce Mesopotamia, the Manichaean religion can be understood as a distinctively ‘oriental’ or ‘Asiatic’ expression of the Christian tradition, and therefore as an alternative form of the faith in comparison with the western, Hellenized version which has been historically regarded as the Christian mainstream. From these parallel processes of regional formation emerged a battle over the legacy of Jesus as both of these Christianities sent missions into the territory of the other, each claiming to be the true disciples of Jesus. In its ideological, liturgical, and institutional independence from other forms of Christianity, as well as in its remarkable geographic and historical extent, Manichaeism can be considered the great divergent offspring of the Christian tradition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Early Christian World
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages921-940
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781351678308
ISBN (Print)9781138200074
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Christian Tradition
Jesus
Manichaeism
Religion
Christianity
World Religions
Disciples
Third Century
Offspring
Confluence
Ideology
Mesopotamia
Faith
Oriental
Christian Mission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

BeDuhn, J. D. (2017). Manichaeism. In The Early Christian World (pp. 921-940). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165837

Manichaeism. / BeDuhn, Jason D.

The Early Christian World. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 921-940.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

BeDuhn, JD 2017, Manichaeism. in The Early Christian World. Taylor and Francis, pp. 921-940. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165837
BeDuhn JD. Manichaeism. In The Early Christian World. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 921-940 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165837
BeDuhn, Jason D. / Manichaeism. The Early Christian World. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 921-940
@inbook{91030d854ed94b49859a1bfec8ea1397,
title = "Manichaeism",
abstract = "Although in many respects Manichaeism can and should be considered a distinct world religion, it belongs to the larger Christian tradition, broadly construed, through the special place it accords Jesus Christ in its ideology and devotional practices. Arising from the confluence of the early Christian mission with indigenous religious elements of third-century ce Mesopotamia, the Manichaean religion can be understood as a distinctively ‘oriental’ or ‘Asiatic’ expression of the Christian tradition, and therefore as an alternative form of the faith in comparison with the western, Hellenized version which has been historically regarded as the Christian mainstream. From these parallel processes of regional formation emerged a battle over the legacy of Jesus as both of these Christianities sent missions into the territory of the other, each claiming to be the true disciples of Jesus. In its ideological, liturgical, and institutional independence from other forms of Christianity, as well as in its remarkable geographic and historical extent, Manichaeism can be considered the great divergent offspring of the Christian tradition.",
author = "BeDuhn, {Jason D}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315165837",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138200074",
pages = "921--940",
booktitle = "The Early Christian World",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Manichaeism

AU - BeDuhn, Jason D

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Although in many respects Manichaeism can and should be considered a distinct world religion, it belongs to the larger Christian tradition, broadly construed, through the special place it accords Jesus Christ in its ideology and devotional practices. Arising from the confluence of the early Christian mission with indigenous religious elements of third-century ce Mesopotamia, the Manichaean religion can be understood as a distinctively ‘oriental’ or ‘Asiatic’ expression of the Christian tradition, and therefore as an alternative form of the faith in comparison with the western, Hellenized version which has been historically regarded as the Christian mainstream. From these parallel processes of regional formation emerged a battle over the legacy of Jesus as both of these Christianities sent missions into the territory of the other, each claiming to be the true disciples of Jesus. In its ideological, liturgical, and institutional independence from other forms of Christianity, as well as in its remarkable geographic and historical extent, Manichaeism can be considered the great divergent offspring of the Christian tradition.

AB - Although in many respects Manichaeism can and should be considered a distinct world religion, it belongs to the larger Christian tradition, broadly construed, through the special place it accords Jesus Christ in its ideology and devotional practices. Arising from the confluence of the early Christian mission with indigenous religious elements of third-century ce Mesopotamia, the Manichaean religion can be understood as a distinctively ‘oriental’ or ‘Asiatic’ expression of the Christian tradition, and therefore as an alternative form of the faith in comparison with the western, Hellenized version which has been historically regarded as the Christian mainstream. From these parallel processes of regional formation emerged a battle over the legacy of Jesus as both of these Christianities sent missions into the territory of the other, each claiming to be the true disciples of Jesus. In its ideological, liturgical, and institutional independence from other forms of Christianity, as well as in its remarkable geographic and historical extent, Manichaeism can be considered the great divergent offspring of the Christian tradition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049972442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049972442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315165837

DO - 10.4324/9781315165837

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138200074

SP - 921

EP - 940

BT - The Early Christian World

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -