Listening to student conversations during clicker questions

What you have not heard might surprise you!

Mark C James, Shannon Willoughby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When instructors provide time for students to discuss their ideas in Peer Instruction, instructors minimally expect that the conversation partners will discuss their opinions relating to the physical attributes posed in a question and submit clicker responses that coincide with individual opinions. We defined conversations that met these two criteria as "standard conversations." In our study of 361 recorded Peer Instruction conversations from large introductory astronomy classrooms taught by experienced instructors, we found that 38% of student conversations were standard conversations. Of the remaining 62%, we identified three broad categories consisting of ten types of "nonstandard" conversations. The first category of conversations describes student ideas that were not reflected in any of the given multiple choice answers. The second category includes issues related to the interpretation of the statistical feedback provided by electronic classroom response systems. The third category describes common pitfalls experienced by students during conversations that led to unproductive interactions. Our analysis of nonstandard Peer Instruction conversations will be useful to practitioners and researchers seeking to improve the implementation of Peer Instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number007011AJP
Pages (from-to)123-132
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Physics
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

conversation
students
instructors
education
astronomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Listening to student conversations during clicker questions : What you have not heard might surprise you! / James, Mark C; Willoughby, Shannon.

In: American Journal of Physics, Vol. 79, No. 1, 007011AJP, 01.2011, p. 123-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f35ef530284a4f2296f241693fda0650,
title = "Listening to student conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard might surprise you!",
abstract = "When instructors provide time for students to discuss their ideas in Peer Instruction, instructors minimally expect that the conversation partners will discuss their opinions relating to the physical attributes posed in a question and submit clicker responses that coincide with individual opinions. We defined conversations that met these two criteria as {"}standard conversations.{"} In our study of 361 recorded Peer Instruction conversations from large introductory astronomy classrooms taught by experienced instructors, we found that 38{\%} of student conversations were standard conversations. Of the remaining 62{\%}, we identified three broad categories consisting of ten types of {"}nonstandard{"} conversations. The first category of conversations describes student ideas that were not reflected in any of the given multiple choice answers. The second category includes issues related to the interpretation of the statistical feedback provided by electronic classroom response systems. The third category describes common pitfalls experienced by students during conversations that led to unproductive interactions. Our analysis of nonstandard Peer Instruction conversations will be useful to practitioners and researchers seeking to improve the implementation of Peer Instruction.",
author = "James, {Mark C} and Shannon Willoughby",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1119/1.3488097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "123--132",
journal = "American Journal of Physics",
issn = "0002-9505",
publisher = "American Association of Physics Teachers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Listening to student conversations during clicker questions

T2 - What you have not heard might surprise you!

AU - James, Mark C

AU - Willoughby, Shannon

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - When instructors provide time for students to discuss their ideas in Peer Instruction, instructors minimally expect that the conversation partners will discuss their opinions relating to the physical attributes posed in a question and submit clicker responses that coincide with individual opinions. We defined conversations that met these two criteria as "standard conversations." In our study of 361 recorded Peer Instruction conversations from large introductory astronomy classrooms taught by experienced instructors, we found that 38% of student conversations were standard conversations. Of the remaining 62%, we identified three broad categories consisting of ten types of "nonstandard" conversations. The first category of conversations describes student ideas that were not reflected in any of the given multiple choice answers. The second category includes issues related to the interpretation of the statistical feedback provided by electronic classroom response systems. The third category describes common pitfalls experienced by students during conversations that led to unproductive interactions. Our analysis of nonstandard Peer Instruction conversations will be useful to practitioners and researchers seeking to improve the implementation of Peer Instruction.

AB - When instructors provide time for students to discuss their ideas in Peer Instruction, instructors minimally expect that the conversation partners will discuss their opinions relating to the physical attributes posed in a question and submit clicker responses that coincide with individual opinions. We defined conversations that met these two criteria as "standard conversations." In our study of 361 recorded Peer Instruction conversations from large introductory astronomy classrooms taught by experienced instructors, we found that 38% of student conversations were standard conversations. Of the remaining 62%, we identified three broad categories consisting of ten types of "nonstandard" conversations. The first category of conversations describes student ideas that were not reflected in any of the given multiple choice answers. The second category includes issues related to the interpretation of the statistical feedback provided by electronic classroom response systems. The third category describes common pitfalls experienced by students during conversations that led to unproductive interactions. Our analysis of nonstandard Peer Instruction conversations will be useful to practitioners and researchers seeking to improve the implementation of Peer Instruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650734780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650734780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1119/1.3488097

DO - 10.1119/1.3488097

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 123

EP - 132

JO - American Journal of Physics

JF - American Journal of Physics

SN - 0002-9505

IS - 1

M1 - 007011AJP

ER -