Limits to maximal performance

James H. Jones, Stan L Lindstedt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Body size fundamentally affects maximal locomotor performance in mammals. Comparisons of performances of different-sized animals yield different results if made using relative, rather than absolute scales. Absolute speed may be a reasonable way to evaluate the locomotor performance of an animal that must escape predators in real time. However, comparisons of metabolic power in animals of different size can only be made meaningfully on a mass-specific basis. Numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and storage of elastic energy during locomotion change with body size, which results in allometric relationships that make the energetic cost of locomotion (α M(b)-0.3) more expensive for small mammals than for large mammals. Small mammals have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis (α M(b)0.15) and higher specific aerobic capacities (α M(b)-0.13) than large mammals. However, the energetic cost of transport increases more than aerobic power as mammals get smaller. The higher ratio of cost to available power in small mammals may explain why they run more slowly than large mammals, as a rule. Maximum aerobic capacity is allometrically related to body size. Limits to V̇(O2max) can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, as in goats, or by the O2 transport system, as in humans and horses. No single step in the O2 transport system can limit the flux of O2 by itself; however, in an average non-athletic species of mammal, any of the steps in the system might appear to be the weakest link. In highly aerobic athletic species, and possibly elite athletic individuals of other species (e.g. humans), the malleable elements of the O2 transport system may develop to the point that their O2 transport capacities approach that of the least malleable element in the system, the lung. V̇(O2max) is very high in such individuals, and appears to be limited by simultaneous failure of all components of the O2 transport system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-569
Number of pages23
JournalAnnual Review of Physiology
Volume55
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Mammals
Body Size
Locomotion
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sports
Glycolysis
Mechanics
Goats
Horses
Lung

Keywords

  • aerobic capacity
  • allometry
  • energetics
  • exercise
  • running

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Cite this

Limits to maximal performance. / Jones, James H.; Lindstedt, Stan L.

In: Annual Review of Physiology, Vol. 55, 1993, p. 547-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jones, James H. ; Lindstedt, Stan L. / Limits to maximal performance. In: Annual Review of Physiology. 1993 ; Vol. 55. pp. 547-569.
@article{7e28405dbc254260a8ba4c6a15fe49c0,
title = "Limits to maximal performance",
abstract = "Body size fundamentally affects maximal locomotor performance in mammals. Comparisons of performances of different-sized animals yield different results if made using relative, rather than absolute scales. Absolute speed may be a reasonable way to evaluate the locomotor performance of an animal that must escape predators in real time. However, comparisons of metabolic power in animals of different size can only be made meaningfully on a mass-specific basis. Numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and storage of elastic energy during locomotion change with body size, which results in allometric relationships that make the energetic cost of locomotion (α M(b)-0.3) more expensive for small mammals than for large mammals. Small mammals have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis (α M(b)0.15) and higher specific aerobic capacities (α M(b)-0.13) than large mammals. However, the energetic cost of transport increases more than aerobic power as mammals get smaller. The higher ratio of cost to available power in small mammals may explain why they run more slowly than large mammals, as a rule. Maximum aerobic capacity is allometrically related to body size. Limits to V̇(O2max) can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, as in goats, or by the O2 transport system, as in humans and horses. No single step in the O2 transport system can limit the flux of O2 by itself; however, in an average non-athletic species of mammal, any of the steps in the system might appear to be the weakest link. In highly aerobic athletic species, and possibly elite athletic individuals of other species (e.g. humans), the malleable elements of the O2 transport system may develop to the point that their O2 transport capacities approach that of the least malleable element in the system, the lung. V̇(O2max) is very high in such individuals, and appears to be limited by simultaneous failure of all components of the O2 transport system.",
keywords = "aerobic capacity, allometry, energetics, exercise, running",
author = "Jones, {James H.} and Lindstedt, {Stan L}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "547--569",
journal = "Annual Review of Physiology",
issn = "0066-4278",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limits to maximal performance

AU - Jones, James H.

AU - Lindstedt, Stan L

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Body size fundamentally affects maximal locomotor performance in mammals. Comparisons of performances of different-sized animals yield different results if made using relative, rather than absolute scales. Absolute speed may be a reasonable way to evaluate the locomotor performance of an animal that must escape predators in real time. However, comparisons of metabolic power in animals of different size can only be made meaningfully on a mass-specific basis. Numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and storage of elastic energy during locomotion change with body size, which results in allometric relationships that make the energetic cost of locomotion (α M(b)-0.3) more expensive for small mammals than for large mammals. Small mammals have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis (α M(b)0.15) and higher specific aerobic capacities (α M(b)-0.13) than large mammals. However, the energetic cost of transport increases more than aerobic power as mammals get smaller. The higher ratio of cost to available power in small mammals may explain why they run more slowly than large mammals, as a rule. Maximum aerobic capacity is allometrically related to body size. Limits to V̇(O2max) can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, as in goats, or by the O2 transport system, as in humans and horses. No single step in the O2 transport system can limit the flux of O2 by itself; however, in an average non-athletic species of mammal, any of the steps in the system might appear to be the weakest link. In highly aerobic athletic species, and possibly elite athletic individuals of other species (e.g. humans), the malleable elements of the O2 transport system may develop to the point that their O2 transport capacities approach that of the least malleable element in the system, the lung. V̇(O2max) is very high in such individuals, and appears to be limited by simultaneous failure of all components of the O2 transport system.

AB - Body size fundamentally affects maximal locomotor performance in mammals. Comparisons of performances of different-sized animals yield different results if made using relative, rather than absolute scales. Absolute speed may be a reasonable way to evaluate the locomotor performance of an animal that must escape predators in real time. However, comparisons of metabolic power in animals of different size can only be made meaningfully on a mass-specific basis. Numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and storage of elastic energy during locomotion change with body size, which results in allometric relationships that make the energetic cost of locomotion (α M(b)-0.3) more expensive for small mammals than for large mammals. Small mammals have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis (α M(b)0.15) and higher specific aerobic capacities (α M(b)-0.13) than large mammals. However, the energetic cost of transport increases more than aerobic power as mammals get smaller. The higher ratio of cost to available power in small mammals may explain why they run more slowly than large mammals, as a rule. Maximum aerobic capacity is allometrically related to body size. Limits to V̇(O2max) can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, as in goats, or by the O2 transport system, as in humans and horses. No single step in the O2 transport system can limit the flux of O2 by itself; however, in an average non-athletic species of mammal, any of the steps in the system might appear to be the weakest link. In highly aerobic athletic species, and possibly elite athletic individuals of other species (e.g. humans), the malleable elements of the O2 transport system may develop to the point that their O2 transport capacities approach that of the least malleable element in the system, the lung. V̇(O2max) is very high in such individuals, and appears to be limited by simultaneous failure of all components of the O2 transport system.

KW - aerobic capacity

KW - allometry

KW - energetics

KW - exercise

KW - running

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027415390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027415390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8466184

AN - SCOPUS:0027415390

VL - 55

SP - 547

EP - 569

JO - Annual Review of Physiology

JF - Annual Review of Physiology

SN - 0066-4278

ER -