Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem

Anuj Sharma, Edward J Smaglik, Sirisha Kothuri, Oliver Smith, Peter Koonce, Tingting Huang

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To improve the safety of people walking at particular signalized intersections, traffic signal engineers may implement leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) to provide pedestrians with a walk signal for a few seconds before the parallel vehicular green indication. Previous beforeandafter studies and simple economic analyses have indicated that LPIs are lowcost tools that can reduce vehicle–pedestrian conflicts and crashes at some signalized intersections. Despite this evidence, municipalities have little guidance for when to implement LPIs. A marginal benefit–cost framework is developed with quantitative metrics and extends the concept of traffic conflicts and marginal safety–delay tradeoffs to analyze the appropriateness of implementing an LPI at specific signalized intersections. The method provides guidance to help quantify the probability of a conflict occurring and direction on whether to implement an LPI at a given location from macroscopiclevel inputs, including number of turning movements, crash data, and geometry. A case study with sample data indicated that an LPI was costeffective for the scenario presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTraffic Signal Systems, Volume 2
PublisherNational Research Council
Pages96-104
Number of pages9
Volume2620
ISBN (Electronic)9780309441759
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Publication series

NameTransportation Research Record
Volume2620
ISSN (Print)0361-1981

Fingerprint

Traffic signals
Engineers
Economics
Geometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Sharma, A., Smaglik, E. J., Kothuri, S., Smith, O., Koonce, P., & Huang, T. (2017). Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem. In Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2 (Vol. 2620, pp. 96-104). (Transportation Research Record; Vol. 2620). National Research Council. https://doi.org/10.3141/2620-09

Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem. / Sharma, Anuj; Smaglik, Edward J; Kothuri, Sirisha; Smith, Oliver; Koonce, Peter; Huang, Tingting.

Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2. Vol. 2620 National Research Council, 2017. p. 96-104 (Transportation Research Record; Vol. 2620).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Sharma, A, Smaglik, EJ, Kothuri, S, Smith, O, Koonce, P & Huang, T 2017, Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem. in Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2. vol. 2620, Transportation Research Record, vol. 2620, National Research Council, pp. 96-104. https://doi.org/10.3141/2620-09
Sharma A, Smaglik EJ, Kothuri S, Smith O, Koonce P, Huang T. Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem. In Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2. Vol. 2620. National Research Council. 2017. p. 96-104. (Transportation Research Record). https://doi.org/10.3141/2620-09
Sharma, Anuj ; Smaglik, Edward J ; Kothuri, Sirisha ; Smith, Oliver ; Koonce, Peter ; Huang, Tingting. / Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem. Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2. Vol. 2620 National Research Council, 2017. pp. 96-104 (Transportation Research Record).
@inbook{129b79f9374d4559b2866efac845fa52,
title = "Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem",
abstract = "To improve the safety of people walking at particular signalized intersections, traffic signal engineers may implement leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) to provide pedestrians with a walk signal for a few seconds before the parallel vehicular green indication. Previous beforeandafter studies and simple economic analyses have indicated that LPIs are lowcost tools that can reduce vehicle–pedestrian conflicts and crashes at some signalized intersections. Despite this evidence, municipalities have little guidance for when to implement LPIs. A marginal benefit–cost framework is developed with quantitative metrics and extends the concept of traffic conflicts and marginal safety–delay tradeoffs to analyze the appropriateness of implementing an LPI at specific signalized intersections. The method provides guidance to help quantify the probability of a conflict occurring and direction on whether to implement an LPI at a given location from macroscopiclevel inputs, including number of turning movements, crash data, and geometry. A case study with sample data indicated that an LPI was costeffective for the scenario presented.",
author = "Anuj Sharma and Smaglik, {Edward J} and Sirisha Kothuri and Oliver Smith and Peter Koonce and Tingting Huang",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3141/2620-09",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2620",
series = "Transportation Research Record",
publisher = "National Research Council",
pages = "96--104",
booktitle = "Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2",
address = "Canada",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Leading pedestrian intervals treating the decision to implement as a marginal benefit–Cost problem

AU - Sharma, Anuj

AU - Smaglik, Edward J

AU - Kothuri, Sirisha

AU - Smith, Oliver

AU - Koonce, Peter

AU - Huang, Tingting

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - To improve the safety of people walking at particular signalized intersections, traffic signal engineers may implement leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) to provide pedestrians with a walk signal for a few seconds before the parallel vehicular green indication. Previous beforeandafter studies and simple economic analyses have indicated that LPIs are lowcost tools that can reduce vehicle–pedestrian conflicts and crashes at some signalized intersections. Despite this evidence, municipalities have little guidance for when to implement LPIs. A marginal benefit–cost framework is developed with quantitative metrics and extends the concept of traffic conflicts and marginal safety–delay tradeoffs to analyze the appropriateness of implementing an LPI at specific signalized intersections. The method provides guidance to help quantify the probability of a conflict occurring and direction on whether to implement an LPI at a given location from macroscopiclevel inputs, including number of turning movements, crash data, and geometry. A case study with sample data indicated that an LPI was costeffective for the scenario presented.

AB - To improve the safety of people walking at particular signalized intersections, traffic signal engineers may implement leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) to provide pedestrians with a walk signal for a few seconds before the parallel vehicular green indication. Previous beforeandafter studies and simple economic analyses have indicated that LPIs are lowcost tools that can reduce vehicle–pedestrian conflicts and crashes at some signalized intersections. Despite this evidence, municipalities have little guidance for when to implement LPIs. A marginal benefit–cost framework is developed with quantitative metrics and extends the concept of traffic conflicts and marginal safety–delay tradeoffs to analyze the appropriateness of implementing an LPI at specific signalized intersections. The method provides guidance to help quantify the probability of a conflict occurring and direction on whether to implement an LPI at a given location from macroscopiclevel inputs, including number of turning movements, crash data, and geometry. A case study with sample data indicated that an LPI was costeffective for the scenario presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033786453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033786453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3141/2620-09

DO - 10.3141/2620-09

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85033786453

VL - 2620

T3 - Transportation Research Record

SP - 96

EP - 104

BT - Traffic Signal Systems, Volume 2

PB - National Research Council

ER -