Language-specific grit: exploring psychometric properties, predictive validity, and differences across contexts

Ekaterina Sudina, Jason Brown, Brien Datzman, Yukiko Oki, Katherine Song, Robert Cavanaugh, Bala Thiruchelvam, Luke Plonsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

‘Grit’ has been identified as an important predictor of success in a number of academic and non-academic domains (Duckworth, A. L., C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly. 2007. “Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 1087–1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087). The present study responds to calls to examine language-specific (L2) grit. We investigated the factor structure of the L2-Grit Scale (Teimouri, Y., L. Plonsky, and F. Tabandeh. in press. “L2 Grit: Passion and Perseverance for Second-Language Learning.” Language Teaching Research, 1–26. doi:10.1177/1362168820921895) and examined the predictive validity of grit and three other individual differences in relation to English proficiency among second and foreign language learners from different countries. Factor analysis revealed a two-dimensional structure of the L2-Grit Scale. However, the correlation between the factors was stronger in the EFL than in the ESL sample. Moreover, the L2 grit subscales had differential predictive validity: Perseverance of Effort was a significant positive predictor of proficiency in the EFL context, while Consistency of Interest was a significant negative predictor in the ESL context. This study represents one of the first inquiries into L2 grit and how it relates to the learning context in particular.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInnovation in Language Learning and Teaching
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

Keywords

  • EFL
  • ESL
  • L2 grit
  • language proficiency
  • learning context

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Language-specific grit: exploring psychometric properties, predictive validity, and differences across contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this