Land use designation and vegetation community structure in the Adirondack uplands (New York, USA)

T. Woodcock, C. Evans, C. Laxson, R. Ticker, James A Allen, J. Mihuc, E. Allen, T. Mihuc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Question: Does forest vegetation community structure reflect legislative land use designations? Location: Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Methods: The Adirondack Park, located in northern New York State, is a mixture of public and private lands, with state-owned Forest Preserve lands comprising ca. 42% of the 2.4 million ha, on which timber harvesting and many other forms of anthropogenic disturbance are prohibited. A survey of vegetation communities was conducted in eighteen upland catchments with differing land use history (managed and Forest Preserve), including overstory, understory, and dead wood (snags and downed woody debris) using randomly placed plots. Results: Mean overstory density and basal area were not significantly different between land uses, although mean overstory tree size was greater in Preserve catchments. Sapling densities were greater in managed catchments, while mean herb/shrub coverage was not affected by land use. Densities of 25% of common species were affected by land use, determined by GIS coverages constructed using an Inverse Distance Weighted estimation procedure. Discriminant Analysis of per-plot plant community data correctly classified 89% of both managed and Preserve plots. Conclusion: The success of the Discriminant Analysis in classifying land uses based on vegetation communities indicates its potential utility of this method in comparing forest vegetation to a reference condition in this and other areas. The analysis suggests that at least 85 years is required for Adirondack upland catchments to recover following harvesting. Uncertainty in classification was related to heterogenous management and disturbance patterns within catchments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-520
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Vegetation Science
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

community structure
land use
catchment
vegetation
overstory
discriminant analysis
disturbance
dead wood
timber harvesting
snag
woody debris
private land
sapling
basal area
understory
herb
plant community
shrub
GIS
preserve

Keywords

  • Adirondack Park
  • Forest recovery
  • New York Forest Preserve
  • Reference condition
  • Timber harvesting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology

Cite this

Land use designation and vegetation community structure in the Adirondack uplands (New York, USA). / Woodcock, T.; Evans, C.; Laxson, C.; Ticker, R.; Allen, James A; Mihuc, J.; Allen, E.; Mihuc, T.

In: Applied Vegetation Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2008, p. 509-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woodcock, T, Evans, C, Laxson, C, Ticker, R, Allen, JA, Mihuc, J, Allen, E & Mihuc, T 2008, 'Land use designation and vegetation community structure in the Adirondack uplands (New York, USA)', Applied Vegetation Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 509-520. https://doi.org/10.3170/2008-7-18563
Woodcock, T. ; Evans, C. ; Laxson, C. ; Ticker, R. ; Allen, James A ; Mihuc, J. ; Allen, E. ; Mihuc, T. / Land use designation and vegetation community structure in the Adirondack uplands (New York, USA). In: Applied Vegetation Science. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 509-520.
@article{c6327a8e12b94220bd5f66cb3be59392,
title = "Land use designation and vegetation community structure in the Adirondack uplands (New York, USA)",
abstract = "Question: Does forest vegetation community structure reflect legislative land use designations? Location: Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Methods: The Adirondack Park, located in northern New York State, is a mixture of public and private lands, with state-owned Forest Preserve lands comprising ca. 42{\%} of the 2.4 million ha, on which timber harvesting and many other forms of anthropogenic disturbance are prohibited. A survey of vegetation communities was conducted in eighteen upland catchments with differing land use history (managed and Forest Preserve), including overstory, understory, and dead wood (snags and downed woody debris) using randomly placed plots. Results: Mean overstory density and basal area were not significantly different between land uses, although mean overstory tree size was greater in Preserve catchments. Sapling densities were greater in managed catchments, while mean herb/shrub coverage was not affected by land use. Densities of 25{\%} of common species were affected by land use, determined by GIS coverages constructed using an Inverse Distance Weighted estimation procedure. Discriminant Analysis of per-plot plant community data correctly classified 89{\%} of both managed and Preserve plots. Conclusion: The success of the Discriminant Analysis in classifying land uses based on vegetation communities indicates its potential utility of this method in comparing forest vegetation to a reference condition in this and other areas. The analysis suggests that at least 85 years is required for Adirondack upland catchments to recover following harvesting. Uncertainty in classification was related to heterogenous management and disturbance patterns within catchments.",
keywords = "Adirondack Park, Forest recovery, New York Forest Preserve, Reference condition, Timber harvesting",
author = "T. Woodcock and C. Evans and C. Laxson and R. Ticker and Allen, {James A} and J. Mihuc and E. Allen and T. Mihuc",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.3170/2008-7-18563",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "509--520",
journal = "Applied Vegetation Science",
issn = "1402-2001",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land use designation and vegetation community structure in the Adirondack uplands (New York, USA)

AU - Woodcock, T.

AU - Evans, C.

AU - Laxson, C.

AU - Ticker, R.

AU - Allen, James A

AU - Mihuc, J.

AU - Allen, E.

AU - Mihuc, T.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Question: Does forest vegetation community structure reflect legislative land use designations? Location: Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Methods: The Adirondack Park, located in northern New York State, is a mixture of public and private lands, with state-owned Forest Preserve lands comprising ca. 42% of the 2.4 million ha, on which timber harvesting and many other forms of anthropogenic disturbance are prohibited. A survey of vegetation communities was conducted in eighteen upland catchments with differing land use history (managed and Forest Preserve), including overstory, understory, and dead wood (snags and downed woody debris) using randomly placed plots. Results: Mean overstory density and basal area were not significantly different between land uses, although mean overstory tree size was greater in Preserve catchments. Sapling densities were greater in managed catchments, while mean herb/shrub coverage was not affected by land use. Densities of 25% of common species were affected by land use, determined by GIS coverages constructed using an Inverse Distance Weighted estimation procedure. Discriminant Analysis of per-plot plant community data correctly classified 89% of both managed and Preserve plots. Conclusion: The success of the Discriminant Analysis in classifying land uses based on vegetation communities indicates its potential utility of this method in comparing forest vegetation to a reference condition in this and other areas. The analysis suggests that at least 85 years is required for Adirondack upland catchments to recover following harvesting. Uncertainty in classification was related to heterogenous management and disturbance patterns within catchments.

AB - Question: Does forest vegetation community structure reflect legislative land use designations? Location: Adirondack Park, New York, USA. Methods: The Adirondack Park, located in northern New York State, is a mixture of public and private lands, with state-owned Forest Preserve lands comprising ca. 42% of the 2.4 million ha, on which timber harvesting and many other forms of anthropogenic disturbance are prohibited. A survey of vegetation communities was conducted in eighteen upland catchments with differing land use history (managed and Forest Preserve), including overstory, understory, and dead wood (snags and downed woody debris) using randomly placed plots. Results: Mean overstory density and basal area were not significantly different between land uses, although mean overstory tree size was greater in Preserve catchments. Sapling densities were greater in managed catchments, while mean herb/shrub coverage was not affected by land use. Densities of 25% of common species were affected by land use, determined by GIS coverages constructed using an Inverse Distance Weighted estimation procedure. Discriminant Analysis of per-plot plant community data correctly classified 89% of both managed and Preserve plots. Conclusion: The success of the Discriminant Analysis in classifying land uses based on vegetation communities indicates its potential utility of this method in comparing forest vegetation to a reference condition in this and other areas. The analysis suggests that at least 85 years is required for Adirondack upland catchments to recover following harvesting. Uncertainty in classification was related to heterogenous management and disturbance patterns within catchments.

KW - Adirondack Park

KW - Forest recovery

KW - New York Forest Preserve

KW - Reference condition

KW - Timber harvesting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249126951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65249126951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3170/2008-7-18563

DO - 10.3170/2008-7-18563

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 509

EP - 520

JO - Applied Vegetation Science

JF - Applied Vegetation Science

SN - 1402-2001

IS - 4

ER -