Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity

Hannah R. Kolus, Deborah N Huntzinger, Christopher R Schwalm, Joshua B. Fisher, Nicholas McKay, Yuanyuan Fang, Anna M. Michalak, Kevin Schaefer, Yaxing Wei, Benjamin Poulter, Jiafu Mao, Nicholas C. Parazoo, Xiaoying Shi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to accurately predict ecosystem drought response and recovery is necessary to produce reliable forecasts of land carbon uptake and future climate. Using a suite of models from the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), we assessed modeled net primary productivity (NPP) response to, and recovery from, drought events against a benchmark derived from tree ring observations between 1948 and 2008 across forested regions of the US and Europe. We find short lag times (0–6 months) between climate anomalies and modeled NPP response. Although models accurately simulate the direction of drought legacy effects (i.e. NPP decreases), projected effects are approximately four times shorter and four times weaker than observations suggest. This discrepancy between observed and simulated vegetation recovery from drought reveals a potential critical model deficiency. Since productivity is a crucial component of the land carbon balance, models that underestimate drought recovery time could overestimate predictions of future land carbon sink strength and, consequently, underestimate forecasts of atmospheric CO 2 .

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2758
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Droughts
Carbon
Climate
Carbon Sequestration
Benchmarking
Carbon Monoxide
Ecosystem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity. / Kolus, Hannah R.; Huntzinger, Deborah N; Schwalm, Christopher R; Fisher, Joshua B.; McKay, Nicholas; Fang, Yuanyuan; Michalak, Anna M.; Schaefer, Kevin; Wei, Yaxing; Poulter, Benjamin; Mao, Jiafu; Parazoo, Nicholas C.; Shi, Xiaoying.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2758, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kolus, HR, Huntzinger, DN, Schwalm, CR, Fisher, JB, McKay, N, Fang, Y, Michalak, AM, Schaefer, K, Wei, Y, Poulter, B, Mao, J, Parazoo, NC & Shi, X 2019, 'Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity', Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, 2758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39373-1
Kolus, Hannah R. ; Huntzinger, Deborah N ; Schwalm, Christopher R ; Fisher, Joshua B. ; McKay, Nicholas ; Fang, Yuanyuan ; Michalak, Anna M. ; Schaefer, Kevin ; Wei, Yaxing ; Poulter, Benjamin ; Mao, Jiafu ; Parazoo, Nicholas C. ; Shi, Xiaoying. / Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity. In: Scientific Reports. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{0da348d8e5d349f8bbd9c3eeb86ec51a,
title = "Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity",
abstract = "The ability to accurately predict ecosystem drought response and recovery is necessary to produce reliable forecasts of land carbon uptake and future climate. Using a suite of models from the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), we assessed modeled net primary productivity (NPP) response to, and recovery from, drought events against a benchmark derived from tree ring observations between 1948 and 2008 across forested regions of the US and Europe. We find short lag times (0–6 months) between climate anomalies and modeled NPP response. Although models accurately simulate the direction of drought legacy effects (i.e. NPP decreases), projected effects are approximately four times shorter and four times weaker than observations suggest. This discrepancy between observed and simulated vegetation recovery from drought reveals a potential critical model deficiency. Since productivity is a crucial component of the land carbon balance, models that underestimate drought recovery time could overestimate predictions of future land carbon sink strength and, consequently, underestimate forecasts of atmospheric CO 2 .",
author = "Kolus, {Hannah R.} and Huntzinger, {Deborah N} and Schwalm, {Christopher R} and Fisher, {Joshua B.} and Nicholas McKay and Yuanyuan Fang and Michalak, {Anna M.} and Kevin Schaefer and Yaxing Wei and Benjamin Poulter and Jiafu Mao and Parazoo, {Nicholas C.} and Xiaoying Shi",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-019-39373-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land carbon models underestimate the severity and duration of drought’s impact on plant productivity

AU - Kolus, Hannah R.

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah N

AU - Schwalm, Christopher R

AU - Fisher, Joshua B.

AU - McKay, Nicholas

AU - Fang, Yuanyuan

AU - Michalak, Anna M.

AU - Schaefer, Kevin

AU - Wei, Yaxing

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Mao, Jiafu

AU - Parazoo, Nicholas C.

AU - Shi, Xiaoying

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The ability to accurately predict ecosystem drought response and recovery is necessary to produce reliable forecasts of land carbon uptake and future climate. Using a suite of models from the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), we assessed modeled net primary productivity (NPP) response to, and recovery from, drought events against a benchmark derived from tree ring observations between 1948 and 2008 across forested regions of the US and Europe. We find short lag times (0–6 months) between climate anomalies and modeled NPP response. Although models accurately simulate the direction of drought legacy effects (i.e. NPP decreases), projected effects are approximately four times shorter and four times weaker than observations suggest. This discrepancy between observed and simulated vegetation recovery from drought reveals a potential critical model deficiency. Since productivity is a crucial component of the land carbon balance, models that underestimate drought recovery time could overestimate predictions of future land carbon sink strength and, consequently, underestimate forecasts of atmospheric CO 2 .

AB - The ability to accurately predict ecosystem drought response and recovery is necessary to produce reliable forecasts of land carbon uptake and future climate. Using a suite of models from the Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project (MsTMIP), we assessed modeled net primary productivity (NPP) response to, and recovery from, drought events against a benchmark derived from tree ring observations between 1948 and 2008 across forested regions of the US and Europe. We find short lag times (0–6 months) between climate anomalies and modeled NPP response. Although models accurately simulate the direction of drought legacy effects (i.e. NPP decreases), projected effects are approximately four times shorter and four times weaker than observations suggest. This discrepancy between observed and simulated vegetation recovery from drought reveals a potential critical model deficiency. Since productivity is a crucial component of the land carbon balance, models that underestimate drought recovery time could overestimate predictions of future land carbon sink strength and, consequently, underestimate forecasts of atmospheric CO 2 .

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062148954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062148954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-39373-1

DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-39373-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 30808971

AN - SCOPUS:85062148954

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 2758

ER -