Klein Vs Mehrtens

Restoring the reputation of a great modern

J. Bair, P. Błaszczyk, P. Heinig, M. Katz, J. P. Schafermeyer, David M Sherry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Historian Herbert Mehrtens sought to portray the history of turn-of-the-century mathematics as a struggle of modern vs countermodern, led respectively by David Hilbert and Felix Klein. Some of Mehrtens' conclusions have been picked up by both historians (Jeremy Gray) and mathematicians (Frank Quinn). We argue that Klein and Hilbert, both at Göttingen, were not adversaries but rather modernist allies in a bid to broaden the scope of mathematics beyond a narrow focus on arithmetized analysis as practiced by the Berlin school. Klein's Göttingen lecture and other texts shed light on Klein's modernism. Hilbert's views on intuition are closer to Klein's views than Mehrtens is willing to allow. Klein and Hilbert were equally interested in the axiomatisation of physics. Among Klein's credits is helping launch the career of Abraham Fraenkel, and advancing the careers of Sophus Lie, Emmy Noether, and Ernst Zermelo, all four surely of impeccable modernist credentials. Mehrtens' unsourced claim that Hilbert was interested in production rather than meaning appears to stem from Mehrtens' marxist leanings. Mehrtens' claim that [the future SS-Brigadeführer] \Theodor Vahlen . . . cited Klein's racist distinctions within mathematics, and sharpened them into open antisemitism" fabricates a spurious continuity between the two figures mentioned and is thus an odious misrepresentation of Klein's position.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-219
Number of pages31
JournalMatematychni Studii
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hilbert
Noether
Axiomatization
Figure
Physics
Reputation

Keywords

  • Arithmetized analysis
  • Axiomatisation of geometry
  • Axiomatisation of physics
  • David Hilbert
  • Felix Klein
  • Formalism
  • Intuition
  • Karl Weierstrass
  • Mathematical realism
  • Modernism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

Bair, J., Błaszczyk, P., Heinig, P., Katz, M., Schafermeyer, J. P., & Sherry, D. M. (2017). Klein Vs Mehrtens: Restoring the reputation of a great modern. Matematychni Studii, 48(2), 189-219. https://doi.org/10.15330/ms.48.2.189-219

Klein Vs Mehrtens : Restoring the reputation of a great modern. / Bair, J.; Błaszczyk, P.; Heinig, P.; Katz, M.; Schafermeyer, J. P.; Sherry, David M.

In: Matematychni Studii, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 189-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bair, J, Błaszczyk, P, Heinig, P, Katz, M, Schafermeyer, JP & Sherry, DM 2017, 'Klein Vs Mehrtens: Restoring the reputation of a great modern', Matematychni Studii, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 189-219. https://doi.org/10.15330/ms.48.2.189-219
Bair, J. ; Błaszczyk, P. ; Heinig, P. ; Katz, M. ; Schafermeyer, J. P. ; Sherry, David M. / Klein Vs Mehrtens : Restoring the reputation of a great modern. In: Matematychni Studii. 2017 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 189-219.
@article{ba363bb8455949cd85e4220d12f0afba,
title = "Klein Vs Mehrtens: Restoring the reputation of a great modern",
abstract = "Historian Herbert Mehrtens sought to portray the history of turn-of-the-century mathematics as a struggle of modern vs countermodern, led respectively by David Hilbert and Felix Klein. Some of Mehrtens' conclusions have been picked up by both historians (Jeremy Gray) and mathematicians (Frank Quinn). We argue that Klein and Hilbert, both at G{\"o}ttingen, were not adversaries but rather modernist allies in a bid to broaden the scope of mathematics beyond a narrow focus on arithmetized analysis as practiced by the Berlin school. Klein's G{\"o}ttingen lecture and other texts shed light on Klein's modernism. Hilbert's views on intuition are closer to Klein's views than Mehrtens is willing to allow. Klein and Hilbert were equally interested in the axiomatisation of physics. Among Klein's credits is helping launch the career of Abraham Fraenkel, and advancing the careers of Sophus Lie, Emmy Noether, and Ernst Zermelo, all four surely of impeccable modernist credentials. Mehrtens' unsourced claim that Hilbert was interested in production rather than meaning appears to stem from Mehrtens' marxist leanings. Mehrtens' claim that [the future SS-Brigadef{\"u}hrer] \Theodor Vahlen . . . cited Klein's racist distinctions within mathematics, and sharpened them into open antisemitism{"} fabricates a spurious continuity between the two figures mentioned and is thus an odious misrepresentation of Klein's position.",
keywords = "Arithmetized analysis, Axiomatisation of geometry, Axiomatisation of physics, David Hilbert, Felix Klein, Formalism, Intuition, Karl Weierstrass, Mathematical realism, Modernism",
author = "J. Bair and P. Błaszczyk and P. Heinig and M. Katz and Schafermeyer, {J. P.} and Sherry, {David M}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15330/ms.48.2.189-219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "189--219",
journal = "Matematychni Studii",
issn = "1027-4634",
publisher = "VNTL Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Klein Vs Mehrtens

T2 - Restoring the reputation of a great modern

AU - Bair, J.

AU - Błaszczyk, P.

AU - Heinig, P.

AU - Katz, M.

AU - Schafermeyer, J. P.

AU - Sherry, David M

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Historian Herbert Mehrtens sought to portray the history of turn-of-the-century mathematics as a struggle of modern vs countermodern, led respectively by David Hilbert and Felix Klein. Some of Mehrtens' conclusions have been picked up by both historians (Jeremy Gray) and mathematicians (Frank Quinn). We argue that Klein and Hilbert, both at Göttingen, were not adversaries but rather modernist allies in a bid to broaden the scope of mathematics beyond a narrow focus on arithmetized analysis as practiced by the Berlin school. Klein's Göttingen lecture and other texts shed light on Klein's modernism. Hilbert's views on intuition are closer to Klein's views than Mehrtens is willing to allow. Klein and Hilbert were equally interested in the axiomatisation of physics. Among Klein's credits is helping launch the career of Abraham Fraenkel, and advancing the careers of Sophus Lie, Emmy Noether, and Ernst Zermelo, all four surely of impeccable modernist credentials. Mehrtens' unsourced claim that Hilbert was interested in production rather than meaning appears to stem from Mehrtens' marxist leanings. Mehrtens' claim that [the future SS-Brigadeführer] \Theodor Vahlen . . . cited Klein's racist distinctions within mathematics, and sharpened them into open antisemitism" fabricates a spurious continuity between the two figures mentioned and is thus an odious misrepresentation of Klein's position.

AB - Historian Herbert Mehrtens sought to portray the history of turn-of-the-century mathematics as a struggle of modern vs countermodern, led respectively by David Hilbert and Felix Klein. Some of Mehrtens' conclusions have been picked up by both historians (Jeremy Gray) and mathematicians (Frank Quinn). We argue that Klein and Hilbert, both at Göttingen, were not adversaries but rather modernist allies in a bid to broaden the scope of mathematics beyond a narrow focus on arithmetized analysis as practiced by the Berlin school. Klein's Göttingen lecture and other texts shed light on Klein's modernism. Hilbert's views on intuition are closer to Klein's views than Mehrtens is willing to allow. Klein and Hilbert were equally interested in the axiomatisation of physics. Among Klein's credits is helping launch the career of Abraham Fraenkel, and advancing the careers of Sophus Lie, Emmy Noether, and Ernst Zermelo, all four surely of impeccable modernist credentials. Mehrtens' unsourced claim that Hilbert was interested in production rather than meaning appears to stem from Mehrtens' marxist leanings. Mehrtens' claim that [the future SS-Brigadeführer] \Theodor Vahlen . . . cited Klein's racist distinctions within mathematics, and sharpened them into open antisemitism" fabricates a spurious continuity between the two figures mentioned and is thus an odious misrepresentation of Klein's position.

KW - Arithmetized analysis

KW - Axiomatisation of geometry

KW - Axiomatisation of physics

KW - David Hilbert

KW - Felix Klein

KW - Formalism

KW - Intuition

KW - Karl Weierstrass

KW - Mathematical realism

KW - Modernism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047523145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047523145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15330/ms.48.2.189-219

DO - 10.15330/ms.48.2.189-219

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 189

EP - 219

JO - Matematychni Studii

JF - Matematychni Studii

SN - 1027-4634

IS - 2

ER -