Jumping sans legs: Does elastic energy storage by the vertebral column power terrestrial jumps in bony fishes?

Miriam A. Ashley-Ross, Benjamin M. Perlman, Alice C Gibb, John H. Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite having no obvious anatomical modifications to facilitate movement over land, numerous small fishes from divergent teleost lineages make brief, voluntary terrestrial forays to escape poor aquatic conditions or to pursue terrestrial prey. Once stranded, these fishes produce a coordinated and effective "tail-flip" jumping behavior, wherein lateral flexion of the axial body into a C-shape, followed by contralateral flexion of the body axis, propels the fish into a ballistic flight-path that covers a distance of multiple body lengths. We ask: how do anatomical structures that evolved in one habitat generate effective movement in a novel habitat? Within this context, we hypothesized that the mechanical properties of the axial skeleton play a critical role in producing effective overland movement, and that tail-flip jumping species demonstrate enhanced elastic energy storage through increased body flexural stiffness or increased body curvature, relative to non-jumping species. To test this hypothesis, we derived a model to predict elastic recoil work from the morphology of the vertebral (neural and hemal) spines. From ground reaction force (GRF) measurements and high-speed video, we calculated elastic recoil work, flexural stiffness, and apparent material stiffness of the body for Micropterus salmoides (a non-jumper) and Kryptolebias marmoratus (adept tail-flip jumper). The model predicted no difference between the two species in work stored by the vertebral spines, and GRF data showed that they produce the same magnitude of mass-specific elastic recoil work. Surprisingly, non-jumper M. salmoides has a stiffer body than tail-flip jumper K. marmoratus. Many tail-flip jumping species possess enlarged, fused hypural bones that support the caudal peduncle, which suggests that the localized structures, rather than the entire axial skeleton, may explain differences in terrestrial performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-18
Number of pages12
JournalZoology
Volume117
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

jumping
spine (bones)
legs
tail
energy
Micropterus salmoides
skeleton
fish
peduncle
habitats
body length
mechanical properties
flight
bones
Osteichthyes
testing
Kryptolebias marmoratus

Keywords

  • Axial skeleton
  • Elastic recoil
  • Flexural stiffness
  • Terrestrial locomotion
  • Vertebral spines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Jumping sans legs : Does elastic energy storage by the vertebral column power terrestrial jumps in bony fishes? / Ashley-Ross, Miriam A.; Perlman, Benjamin M.; Gibb, Alice C; Long, John H.

In: Zoology, Vol. 117, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 7-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashley-Ross, Miriam A. ; Perlman, Benjamin M. ; Gibb, Alice C ; Long, John H. / Jumping sans legs : Does elastic energy storage by the vertebral column power terrestrial jumps in bony fishes?. In: Zoology. 2014 ; Vol. 117, No. 1. pp. 7-18.
@article{21c12638f96843aaaed223f02b0d96e1,
title = "Jumping sans legs: Does elastic energy storage by the vertebral column power terrestrial jumps in bony fishes?",
abstract = "Despite having no obvious anatomical modifications to facilitate movement over land, numerous small fishes from divergent teleost lineages make brief, voluntary terrestrial forays to escape poor aquatic conditions or to pursue terrestrial prey. Once stranded, these fishes produce a coordinated and effective {"}tail-flip{"} jumping behavior, wherein lateral flexion of the axial body into a C-shape, followed by contralateral flexion of the body axis, propels the fish into a ballistic flight-path that covers a distance of multiple body lengths. We ask: how do anatomical structures that evolved in one habitat generate effective movement in a novel habitat? Within this context, we hypothesized that the mechanical properties of the axial skeleton play a critical role in producing effective overland movement, and that tail-flip jumping species demonstrate enhanced elastic energy storage through increased body flexural stiffness or increased body curvature, relative to non-jumping species. To test this hypothesis, we derived a model to predict elastic recoil work from the morphology of the vertebral (neural and hemal) spines. From ground reaction force (GRF) measurements and high-speed video, we calculated elastic recoil work, flexural stiffness, and apparent material stiffness of the body for Micropterus salmoides (a non-jumper) and Kryptolebias marmoratus (adept tail-flip jumper). The model predicted no difference between the two species in work stored by the vertebral spines, and GRF data showed that they produce the same magnitude of mass-specific elastic recoil work. Surprisingly, non-jumper M. salmoides has a stiffer body than tail-flip jumper K. marmoratus. Many tail-flip jumping species possess enlarged, fused hypural bones that support the caudal peduncle, which suggests that the localized structures, rather than the entire axial skeleton, may explain differences in terrestrial performance.",
keywords = "Axial skeleton, Elastic recoil, Flexural stiffness, Terrestrial locomotion, Vertebral spines",
author = "Ashley-Ross, {Miriam A.} and Perlman, {Benjamin M.} and Gibb, {Alice C} and Long, {John H.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "7--18",
journal = "Zoology",
issn = "0944-2006",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jumping sans legs

T2 - Does elastic energy storage by the vertebral column power terrestrial jumps in bony fishes?

AU - Ashley-Ross, Miriam A.

AU - Perlman, Benjamin M.

AU - Gibb, Alice C

AU - Long, John H.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Despite having no obvious anatomical modifications to facilitate movement over land, numerous small fishes from divergent teleost lineages make brief, voluntary terrestrial forays to escape poor aquatic conditions or to pursue terrestrial prey. Once stranded, these fishes produce a coordinated and effective "tail-flip" jumping behavior, wherein lateral flexion of the axial body into a C-shape, followed by contralateral flexion of the body axis, propels the fish into a ballistic flight-path that covers a distance of multiple body lengths. We ask: how do anatomical structures that evolved in one habitat generate effective movement in a novel habitat? Within this context, we hypothesized that the mechanical properties of the axial skeleton play a critical role in producing effective overland movement, and that tail-flip jumping species demonstrate enhanced elastic energy storage through increased body flexural stiffness or increased body curvature, relative to non-jumping species. To test this hypothesis, we derived a model to predict elastic recoil work from the morphology of the vertebral (neural and hemal) spines. From ground reaction force (GRF) measurements and high-speed video, we calculated elastic recoil work, flexural stiffness, and apparent material stiffness of the body for Micropterus salmoides (a non-jumper) and Kryptolebias marmoratus (adept tail-flip jumper). The model predicted no difference between the two species in work stored by the vertebral spines, and GRF data showed that they produce the same magnitude of mass-specific elastic recoil work. Surprisingly, non-jumper M. salmoides has a stiffer body than tail-flip jumper K. marmoratus. Many tail-flip jumping species possess enlarged, fused hypural bones that support the caudal peduncle, which suggests that the localized structures, rather than the entire axial skeleton, may explain differences in terrestrial performance.

AB - Despite having no obvious anatomical modifications to facilitate movement over land, numerous small fishes from divergent teleost lineages make brief, voluntary terrestrial forays to escape poor aquatic conditions or to pursue terrestrial prey. Once stranded, these fishes produce a coordinated and effective "tail-flip" jumping behavior, wherein lateral flexion of the axial body into a C-shape, followed by contralateral flexion of the body axis, propels the fish into a ballistic flight-path that covers a distance of multiple body lengths. We ask: how do anatomical structures that evolved in one habitat generate effective movement in a novel habitat? Within this context, we hypothesized that the mechanical properties of the axial skeleton play a critical role in producing effective overland movement, and that tail-flip jumping species demonstrate enhanced elastic energy storage through increased body flexural stiffness or increased body curvature, relative to non-jumping species. To test this hypothesis, we derived a model to predict elastic recoil work from the morphology of the vertebral (neural and hemal) spines. From ground reaction force (GRF) measurements and high-speed video, we calculated elastic recoil work, flexural stiffness, and apparent material stiffness of the body for Micropterus salmoides (a non-jumper) and Kryptolebias marmoratus (adept tail-flip jumper). The model predicted no difference between the two species in work stored by the vertebral spines, and GRF data showed that they produce the same magnitude of mass-specific elastic recoil work. Surprisingly, non-jumper M. salmoides has a stiffer body than tail-flip jumper K. marmoratus. Many tail-flip jumping species possess enlarged, fused hypural bones that support the caudal peduncle, which suggests that the localized structures, rather than the entire axial skeleton, may explain differences in terrestrial performance.

KW - Axial skeleton

KW - Elastic recoil

KW - Flexural stiffness

KW - Terrestrial locomotion

KW - Vertebral spines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893753753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893753753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.zool.2013.10.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 24388492

AN - SCOPUS:84893753753

VL - 117

SP - 7

EP - 18

JO - Zoology

JF - Zoology

SN - 0944-2006

IS - 1

ER -