Is fire “for the birds”? How two rare species influence fire management across the US

Scott L. Stephens, Leda N. Kobziar, Brandon M. Collins, Raymond Davis, Peter Z Fule, William Gaines, Joseph Ganey, James M. Guldin, Paul F. Hessburg, Kevin Hiers, Serra Hoagland, John J. Keane, Ronald E. Masters, Ann E. McKellar, Warren Montague, Malcolm North, Thomas A. Spies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The US Endangered Species Act has enabled species conservation but has differentially impacted fire management and rare bird conservation in the southern and western US. In the South, prescribed fire and restoration-based forest thinning are commonly used to conserve the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW), whereas in the West, land managers continue to suppress fire across the diverse habitats of the northern, Californian, and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis subspecies; SO). Although the habitat needs of the RCW and SO are not identical, substantial portions of both species’ ranges have historically been exposed to relatively frequent, low- to moderate-intensity fires. Active management with fire and thinning has benefited the RCW but proves challenging in the western US. We suggest the western US could benefit from the adoption of a similar innovative approach through policy, public–private partnerships, and complementarity of endangered species management with multiple objectives. These changes would likely balance long-term goals of SO conservation and enhance forest resilience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

fire management
rare species
bird
endangered species
birds
Picoides borealis
forest thinning
Strix occidentalis
thinning
fire intensity
woodpeckers
prescribed burning
habitats
thinning (plants)
Endangered Species Act
species conservation
complementarity
managers
habitat
subspecies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Is fire “for the birds”? How two rare species influence fire management across the US. / Stephens, Scott L.; Kobziar, Leda N.; Collins, Brandon M.; Davis, Raymond; Fule, Peter Z; Gaines, William; Ganey, Joseph; Guldin, James M.; Hessburg, Paul F.; Hiers, Kevin; Hoagland, Serra; Keane, John J.; Masters, Ronald E.; McKellar, Ann E.; Montague, Warren; North, Malcolm; Spies, Thomas A.

In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Stephens, SL, Kobziar, LN, Collins, BM, Davis, R, Fule, PZ, Gaines, W, Ganey, J, Guldin, JM, Hessburg, PF, Hiers, K, Hoagland, S, Keane, JJ, Masters, RE, McKellar, AE, Montague, W, North, M & Spies, TA 2019, 'Is fire “for the birds”? How two rare species influence fire management across the US', Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2076
Stephens, Scott L. ; Kobziar, Leda N. ; Collins, Brandon M. ; Davis, Raymond ; Fule, Peter Z ; Gaines, William ; Ganey, Joseph ; Guldin, James M. ; Hessburg, Paul F. ; Hiers, Kevin ; Hoagland, Serra ; Keane, John J. ; Masters, Ronald E. ; McKellar, Ann E. ; Montague, Warren ; North, Malcolm ; Spies, Thomas A. / Is fire “for the birds”? How two rare species influence fire management across the US. In: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2019.
@article{098c4a23e00a45d5a685fd8e06a6ee9e,
title = "Is fire “for the birds”? How two rare species influence fire management across the US",
abstract = "The US Endangered Species Act has enabled species conservation but has differentially impacted fire management and rare bird conservation in the southern and western US. In the South, prescribed fire and restoration-based forest thinning are commonly used to conserve the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW), whereas in the West, land managers continue to suppress fire across the diverse habitats of the northern, Californian, and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis subspecies; SO). Although the habitat needs of the RCW and SO are not identical, substantial portions of both species’ ranges have historically been exposed to relatively frequent, low- to moderate-intensity fires. Active management with fire and thinning has benefited the RCW but proves challenging in the western US. We suggest the western US could benefit from the adoption of a similar innovative approach through policy, public–private partnerships, and complementarity of endangered species management with multiple objectives. These changes would likely balance long-term goals of SO conservation and enhance forest resilience.",
author = "Stephens, {Scott L.} and Kobziar, {Leda N.} and Collins, {Brandon M.} and Raymond Davis and Fule, {Peter Z} and William Gaines and Joseph Ganey and Guldin, {James M.} and Hessburg, {Paul F.} and Kevin Hiers and Serra Hoagland and Keane, {John J.} and Masters, {Ronald E.} and McKellar, {Ann E.} and Warren Montague and Malcolm North and Spies, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/fee.2076",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment",
issn = "1540-9295",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is fire “for the birds”? How two rare species influence fire management across the US

AU - Stephens, Scott L.

AU - Kobziar, Leda N.

AU - Collins, Brandon M.

AU - Davis, Raymond

AU - Fule, Peter Z

AU - Gaines, William

AU - Ganey, Joseph

AU - Guldin, James M.

AU - Hessburg, Paul F.

AU - Hiers, Kevin

AU - Hoagland, Serra

AU - Keane, John J.

AU - Masters, Ronald E.

AU - McKellar, Ann E.

AU - Montague, Warren

AU - North, Malcolm

AU - Spies, Thomas A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The US Endangered Species Act has enabled species conservation but has differentially impacted fire management and rare bird conservation in the southern and western US. In the South, prescribed fire and restoration-based forest thinning are commonly used to conserve the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW), whereas in the West, land managers continue to suppress fire across the diverse habitats of the northern, Californian, and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis subspecies; SO). Although the habitat needs of the RCW and SO are not identical, substantial portions of both species’ ranges have historically been exposed to relatively frequent, low- to moderate-intensity fires. Active management with fire and thinning has benefited the RCW but proves challenging in the western US. We suggest the western US could benefit from the adoption of a similar innovative approach through policy, public–private partnerships, and complementarity of endangered species management with multiple objectives. These changes would likely balance long-term goals of SO conservation and enhance forest resilience.

AB - The US Endangered Species Act has enabled species conservation but has differentially impacted fire management and rare bird conservation in the southern and western US. In the South, prescribed fire and restoration-based forest thinning are commonly used to conserve the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis; RCW), whereas in the West, land managers continue to suppress fire across the diverse habitats of the northern, Californian, and Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis subspecies; SO). Although the habitat needs of the RCW and SO are not identical, substantial portions of both species’ ranges have historically been exposed to relatively frequent, low- to moderate-intensity fires. Active management with fire and thinning has benefited the RCW but proves challenging in the western US. We suggest the western US could benefit from the adoption of a similar innovative approach through policy, public–private partnerships, and complementarity of endangered species management with multiple objectives. These changes would likely balance long-term goals of SO conservation and enhance forest resilience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068536157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068536157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/fee.2076

DO - 10.1002/fee.2076

M3 - Review article

JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

SN - 1540-9295

ER -